Skip to main content
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Download PDF

In silico analysis of promoter regions to identify regulatory elements in TetR family transcriptional regulatory genes of Mycobacterium colombiense CECT 3035

Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology volume 20, Article number: 53 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mycobacterium colombiense is an acid-fast, non-motile, rod-shaped mycobacterium confirmed to cause respiratory disease and disseminated infection in immune-compromised patients, and lymphadenopathy in immune-competent children. It has virulence mechanisms that allow them to adapt, survive, replicate, and produce diseases in the host. To tackle the diseases caused by M. colombiense, understanding of the regulation mechanisms of its genes is important. This paper, therefore, analyzes transcription start sites, promoter regions, motifs, transcription factors, and CpG islands in TetR family transcriptional regulatory (TFTR) genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 using neural network promoter prediction, MEME, TOMTOM algorithms, and evolutionary analysis with the help of MEGA-X.

Results

The analysis of 22 protein coding TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 showed that 86.36% and 13.64% of the gene sequences had one and two TSSs, respectively. Using MEME, we identified five motifs (MTF1, MTF2, MTF3, MTF4, and MTF5) and MTF1 was revealed as the common promoter motif for 100% TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 which may serve as binding site for transcription factors that shared a minimum homology of 95.45%. MTF1 was compared to the registered prokaryotic motifs and found to match with 15 of them. MTF1 serves as the binding site mainly for AraC, LexA, and Bacterial histone-like protein families. Other protein families such as MATP, RR, σ-70 factor, TetR, LytTR, LuxR, and NAP also appear to be the binding candidates for MTF1. These families are known to have functions in virulence mechanisms, metabolism, quorum sensing, cell division, and antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, it was found that TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 have many CpG islands with several fragments in their CpG islands. Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis showed close relationship among the genes.

Conclusion

We believe these findings will provide a better understanding of the regulation of TFTR genes in M. colombiense CECT 3035 involved in vital processes such as cell division, pathogenesis, and drug resistance and are likely to provide insights for drug development important to tackle the diseases caused by this mycobacterium. We believe this is the first report of in silico analyses of the transcriptional regulation of M. colombiense TFTR genes.

Background

Mycobacterium colombiense is an acid-fast, non-motile, rod-shaped mycobacterium that belongs to the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) [1]. MAC contains clinically important non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and is the second largest medical complex in the Mycobacterium genus after the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex [2]. MAC comprises species that include M. colombiense, M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. chimaera, M. marseillense, M. timonense, M. boucherdurhonense, M. vulneris, M. arosiense, four subspecies of M. avium, and “MAC-other” species [3]. NTM are believed to be natural inhabitants of the environment, found as saprophytes, commensals, and symbionts in the ecosystem. Since their clinical relevance was unknown, these bacteria have been neglected for many years as they have always been recognized as just environmental contaminants or colonizers [4]. Although, they are not considered as a public health problem, their importance is increasing due to their frequent association with immune-suppression, especially in HIV/AIDS patients, which is highly fatal [5].

NTM are generally acquired from the environment via ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact [6]. They are opportunistic pathogens that cause lymphadenitis, lung infections, skin, and soft tissue infections mostly affecting patients with preexisting pulmonary disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or tuberculosis (TB), or those with systemic impairment of immunity (i.e., patients with HIV infection, leukemia, and those using immunosuppressive drugs) [1, 7]. There are more than 150 non-tuberculous mycobacterial species listed in public databases and about a third of them have been implicated in diseases of humans [4]. NTM has been observed for 100 years, but the trend of increasing prevalence of NTM is of great concern for clinicians as well as microbiologists. In some areas, NTM-associated disease is more abundant than previously believed and is a quietly unfolding disease epidemic, even overtaking TB prevalence which results in an increase in the medical costs [8]. NTM are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the progressive lung diseases [9] where they are also important pathogens because of their high level of antitubercular drug resistance [10].

Among NTM, M. colombiense has been confirmed to cause respiratory disease and disseminated infection in immune-compromised HIV patients, as well as lymphadenopathy in immune-competent children. Nevertheless, very little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie M. colombiense gene expression regulation that play a great role in infection and pathogenesis [11]. Mycobateria are known to display differential drug susceptibility and strong drug resistance to several antibiotics by various mechanisms [12]. Understanding the regulatory pathways involved in drug resistance would aid the drug development process against this pathogen and possibly NTM [13]. TetR family transcription regulators (TFTRs) play a significant role in conferring antibiotic resistance and also control expression of biosynthesis of antibiotics, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, quorum sensing, cytokinesis, morphogenesis, osmotic stress, and various metabolic pathways [14, 15]. A recent report indicated that TFTRs represent the most abundant class of regulators in mycobacteria [16]. However, there are no reports about the regulatory analysis of TFTRs of M. colombiense CECT 3035 in silico predictions of transcriptome data could provide key information on the molecular details of regulatory mechanisms including promoter sequences, type of sigma factors associated to the RNA polymerase (RNAP) involved in the initiation of transcription, as well as other regulatory elements [17]. The objective of this study was therefore, to analyze transcription start site (TSS), promoter regions, transcription factors (TF), and cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) islands in TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 to gain insights into the regulation of gene expression. We also discuss about the role of drug resistance and possible directions for drug development.

Materials and methods

Identification of transcription start site and promoter region

Twenty two encoding genome sequences of TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 starting with prokaryotic start codons (ATG, GTG, and TTG) were identified from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. First, the sequences with start codons were identified and used to determine their TSS. To find TSS, 1 kb sequences upstream of prokaryotic start codon were excised from each gene sequence. In most of the TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035, since the TSS regions are confined beyond 1 kb upstream of a start codon, an additional 1 kb, 2 kb, or more sequences from prokaryotic start codons were excised from each gene sequence. Promoter regions for the anticipated gene in M. colombiense were defined as 1 kb length upstream of each TSSs. For this purpose, the sequences were prepared in the Fasta format and entered into neural network promoter prediction (NNPP version 2.2) tool. NNPP tool was set with minimum standard predictive score (between 0 and 1) cutoff value of 0.8 for prokaryotes [18]. In order to have more accurate prediction value, the highest value of prediction score was considered for regions containing more than one TSS on NNPP output.

Identification of motifs and transcription factors

To identify motifs and transcription factors, 22 sequence encoding genes of M. colombiense were downloaded from GenBank of NCBI database in their Fasta format. After the collection of genes, the whole gene promoters were identified for each gene using NNPP algorithm to find possible transcription promoters in prokaryotic organisms. All identified M. colombiense promoter sequences were analyzed using Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME version 5.3.3) search tool/web server hosted by the National Biomedical Computation Resource to look for motifs and transcription factors that regulate the expression of genes [19]. In addition to motif and transcription factor discovery, MEME is also important in carrying out motif scanning, motif enrichment, motif comparison, and gene regulation [20]. From the optional inputs in MEME, Classic mode (for motif discovery), DNA (for sequence alphabet), zero or one occurrence per sequence (for site distribution) were kept as a default, while five (for the number of motifs MEME should find) were set prior to start searching. Since zero occurrence per sequence or one occurrence per sequence models are sufficient for most motif finding [21], zero or one occurrence per sequence was applied for motif distribution. MEME outputs the result as MEME HTML (High Pretext Markup Programming Language), MEME XML, MEME text output, MAST HTML, MAST XML, and MAST text. We used MEME HTML to discover motifs and motif locations. The discovered motifs were displayed as a request and the motif locations were displayed in the form of block diagrams.

Following MEME results, one of the discovered motifs with the smallest e value was forwarded to other web-based program (TOMTOM) that compares one or more motifs against a database of known motifs for further investigation. The output of TOMTOM includes LOGOS representing the alignment of two motifs, the p value and q value (a measure of false discovery rate) of the match and links back to the parent motif database for more detailed information about the target motif. TOMTOM shows the query motif closely resembles the binding motif (transcription factor) in the set of M. colombiense CECT 3035 gene promoter regions [22].

Identification of CpG islands

To find the CpG islands in TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035, both promoter regions and body regions were used. Accordingly, two algorithms were used. The first algorithm was Takai and Jones’ stringent algorithm—CpG island finder (Database of CpG Islands–http://dbcat.cgm.ntu.edu.tw/). This algorithm was used since it outperforms the others in excluding the short interspersed elements and can identify CpGs that are more likely associated with the 5′ regions of genes [23]. The second was CLC searching genomics Workbench ver. 3.6.5 (http://clcbio.com, CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark). It was used for searching CpG islands using the restriction enzyme MspI cutting sites (fragment sizes between 40 and 220 bp).

Phylogenetic tree

Phylogenetic tree was constructed using molecular evolutionary genetics analysis X (MEGA-X version 10.2.6) using neighbor-joining method [24] with the use of aligned protein sequences from TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035. The tree was drawn to scale with branch lengths showing the evolutionary distances those infer phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the maximum composite likelihood method [25] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [26]. Bootstrap tests were also performed to estimate the phylogeny of the sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 1000 positions in the final dataset.

Results

Transcription start sites identification

From the 22 encoding genome sequences of TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035, 17 (77.27%), 4 (18.18%), and 1 (4.55%) genes start with ATG, GTG, and TTG, respectively. TSS of all the 22 genes were identified using NNPP. Accordingly, the highest prediction score was considered to determine the promoter regions for genes containing more than one transcription start sites. The results show that most genes (19 genes, 86.36%) contain single TSS and only 3 genes (13.64%) contain two TSSs using predictive score at the cutoff value of 0.8. Looking at their distance from the start codon, the farthest gene was found 11,105 bp away from the start codon at 92% predictive score and the closest gene was found 24 bp away from the start codon at 83% predictive score (Table 1).

Table 1 Identified TSSs, predictive score value, and their distances from start codon
Full size table

Common motifs and transcription factors

After the identification of TSS, promoter regions were identified for each gene and loaded to MEME. Accordingly, significant motifs in the input sequence set was searched using MEME through web server and the E value which is the probability of finding well conserved pattern in random sequences. MEME output revealed five motifs (MTF1, MTF2, MTF3, MTF4, and MTF5). MTF1 was found to be the common motif for 100% with the lowest E value (1.1e-013) and a motif width of 29 bp which serve as binding sites for transcription factors sharing a minimum of (95.45%) (Table 2). MTF1 was found to serve as binding sites for transcription factors in the expression and regulation of the genes. Of the total 108 motifs, slightly higher distributions were found in positive strands (56) than negative strands (52) of TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035. The location and distribution of the motifs were found between − 994 and − 9 bp of the transcription start sites (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Identified common motifs in gene promoter regions and number of binding sites
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Positions of motifs relative to TSSs. The nucleotide positions are specified at the bottom of the graph from + 1 (beginning of TSSs) to the upstream 1 kb (− 1 kb) bp

Full size image

To analyze the information content, sequence logos for the common promoter motif (MTF1) was generated by MEME (Fig. 2). This resulted in different characters of motif alignment columns, where the height of the letter represents how frequently that nucleotide is expected to be observed at the defined position.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sequence logos for the identified common promoter motif, MTF1 of M. colombiense CECT 3035 genes. The analysis was carried out using the MEME Suite

Full size image

Furthermore, MTF1 was compared to the registered motifs in publicly available databases so as to check if there are similarities to known regulatory motifs using TOMTOM web application. In a similar manner, TOMTOM provides LOGOS that represent the alignment of two motifs and a numeric score for the match between two motifs. The output from TOMTOM also links back to the parent motif database for detailed information on the biological functions of the matched motif. The results show that MTF1 matched with 15 out of 84 known motifs found in Prokaryotic DNA databases. Looking at the ratio, MTF1 matched with 4 AraC families, 2 LexA families, 2 Bacterial histone-like protein families, and one family of each SLC45 (MATP) family, RR family, σ-70 factor family, TetR family, LytTR family, LuxR family, and NAP family. The matched motifs and their biological roles are shown in Table 3. Based on the functions, we categorized the TFs into different groups. The majority of the matched TFs (7/15) are found to be involved in pathogenesis by the generation of different virulence factors and antibiotic resistance. We grouped other TFs by functions related to Information storage and replication (2/15), metabolism (3/15), and stress survival (3/15).

Table 3 Transcription factor families binding to MTF1 motif of the promoter regions from prokaryotic database and their roles
Full size table

Determination of CpG islands

To further explore the regulatory elements that are involved in TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035, CpG islands were investigated in its promoter and gene body regions using CpG island finder (http://dbcat.cgm.ntu.edu.tw/) and CLC searching genomics Workbench ver. 3.6.5 (http://clcbio.com, CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Accordingly, only 4 (MCOL_RS08145, MCOL_RS05990, MCOL_RS17010, and MCOL_RS04305) of 22 genes of TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 lack CpG islands in their promoter regions with GC content greater than 50% in all genes as parameter set of Obs/Exp greater than 0.65. Similarly, only 1 (MCOL_RS22650) of the 22 genes lack CpG islands in their body regions while all the remaining genes contain one possible CpG island with GC content greater than 61.1%.

On the other hand, digestion of TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 using CLC genomics workbench ver 3.6.1 with MspI restriction enzyme showed a single CpG island in one gene, and all the remaining 21 genes have multiple CpG islands in their promoter regions (Table 4).

Table 4 Determination of MspI sites and fragment sizes for promoter regions
Full size table

Likewise, digestion of the body regions of TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 by MspI restriction enzyme showed 1 gene lacking CpG islands, 5 genes with single CpG islands, 4 genes with two CpG islands, and all the remaining 12 genes with multiple CpG islands (Table 5).

Table 5 MspI cutting sites and fragment sizes for gene body regions
Full size table

Analysis of phylogenetic tree

In recent years, the purpose of phylogenetic trees was expanded to include understanding the relationships among the sequences without regard to the host species, inferring the functions of genes that have not been studied experimentally and elucidating mechanisms that lead to microbial outbreaks [27]. Here, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method and minimum-evolution method of MEGA-X as shown in Fig. 3. Even though homologous evolutionary ancestor supported with 100% bootstrap was shown in the following phylogenetic tree, different closely related clusters and sister groups were observed.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree of M. colombiense CECT 3035 genes using neighbor-joining method

Full size image

Discussion

The DNA sequences around TSSs are important for gene regulation in bacteria. Pinpointing of these TSS permits the identification of potential binding sites for transcriptional regulators those may inhibit or promote translation [28]. In this study, 86.36% and 13.64% genes were found to have a single and two TSSs, respectively. For those genes with two TSSs, TSS with a higher value was considered. This result is in agreement with Boutard et al. [29] where most genes were expressed from a single TSS. Identification of transcription start sites enables identification of promoter regions [30]. Hence, using the identified TSSs of each gene the promoter region was identified for every gene. The promoter element defines the DNA site directing the RNA polymerase for transcription initiation, and it is a crucial element to understand gene expression in bacteria [31]. Accurate prediction of promoters is fundamental for interpreting gene expression patterns, and for constructing and understanding genetic regulatory networks [32]. After the discovery of promoter regions for each gene, we used each promoter sequence to identify motifs and transcription factors using MEME. From the five identified motifs, motif 1 (MTF1) was found as the most common regulatory motif for the TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 to regulate expression of genes (Table 2). The motif width of MTF1 was found to be 29 bp which is in agreement with a recent report which found a motif length of 27 bp represented DNA binding site for a TetR-dependent regulation of a drug efflux pump in Mycobacterium abscessus [33]. In addition, results of MEME also indicated the particular location and distributions of motifs to largely occur between − 974 bp and − 9 bp from transcription start site. This confirms the location of motif to be upstream, neighborhood of the TSS in corresponding with other transcription factors [34].

Additionally, the comparison of query motif (MTF1) with registered motifs in publicly available database of M. colombiense CECT 3035 genes using TOMTOM web application showed that MTF1 matched with 15 out of 84 known motifs found in prokaryotic DNA databases (Table 3). MTF1 matched with 4 AraC families, involved in pathogenesis by the production of virulence factors, dormancy survival and drug resistance by the formation of biofilms, cell-to-cell communication, and arginine metabolism; 2 LexA families, involved in survival by inducing SOS response upon DNA damage and salt stress management; 2 bacterial histone-like protein families, involved in metabolism of aromatic compounds and downregulation of genes for entering into stationary phase; and one family of each SLC45 (MATP) family, involved in replication; RR family, involved in cell cycle programs of chromosome replication and genetic transcription; σ-70 factor family, for virulence and mobilization of metals by siderophores; TetR family, for cell growth by pyrimidine catabolism; LytTR family, for virulence by control of alginate production and type IV pilus function; LuxR family, for pathogenesis by production of endotoxin A; and NAP family, controls the virulence of M. tuberculosis by regulating expression of EspA. These findings match with the functions of TFTR that play a significant role in conferring antibiotic resistance and also control the expression of biosynthesis of antibiotics, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, quorum sensing, cytokinesis, morphogenesis, osmotic stress, and various metabolic pathways [14, 15]. Formation of biofilms is an important strategy in bacteria for survival, pathogenesis, and antibiotic resistance [3, 35]. The presence of glycophospholipids on the outermost portions of the cell envelope enables formation of biofilms on the hyrdrophobic surfaces. Biofilms allow communication and exchange of materials between the closely associated cells and has been linked to confer antibiotic resistance [13, 35, 36]. Antibiotic resistance by biofilms is a complex process which has various modes of action such as the formation of barrier where the exopolysaccharide component greatly reduces permeability to antibiotics, detoxification mechanism which produces enzymes to disrupt or alter the structure of antibiotics that render them inactive, drug efflux pumps that reduces the intracellular concentration of antibiotics by transporting antibiotics outside of the cell, and drug sequestration where specific proteins prevent binding of antibiotics to the targets [35, 37, 38]. The potentially increased horizontal gene transfer between the closely interacting bacterial cells in the biofilms may also contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance [37, 38]. Effective anitmicrobials can be designed based on this knowledge against bacterial biofilms [39]. Quorum sensing (QS) is an important cell-cell communication process that play significant roles in regulation of a variety of biological processes such as virulence gene expression, biofilm formation, drug efflux pumps, and plasmid transfer [37, 40]. In QS regulatory systems, microorganisms produce and release a diffusible autoinducer or QS signal to the surrounding environment, which accumulates along with bacterial growth and induces target gene transcriptional expression upon interaction with the respective signal receptor. In this study, we found MTF1 binds to two TFs, VqsM and LasR, from P. aeruginosa that have been reported to play a role in virulence and QS modulation that positively regulates the QS systems [40, 41]. QS signals could offer an important possible direction for the development of antimicrobials by the design of antagonists based on enzymes that can abolish the QS signals or QS inhibitors that can interfere with the signaling process. Based on the type of signals used by the microbes, i.e., conserved or unique signals, the choice of the design of broad-specificity or narrow-specificity antimicrobials could possibly be facilitated [37, 42]. Iron is an essential element required for microbial growth and virulence. Siderophore molecules (also called mycobactins) are sophisticated iron-acquisition systems to overcome iron deficiency imposed by the host defensive mechanism. These small molecules are secreted into the extracellular space, tightly bind available iron, and then are reinternalized with their bound iron through specific cell surface receptors [43]. Antimicrobial susceptibility with respect to iron metabolism in MAC has been shown to be dependent on mycobactins. Under iron-restricted conditions, the susceptibility to antibiotics such as ethambutol, isoniazid, and d-cycloserine that target cell wall synthesis increased [44]. In this study, MTF1 was found to match with the TF, PvdS from P. aeruginosa involved in the biosynthesis or the uptake of siderophores [45] and may be a potential target for the development of antimicrobials. The other matched TFs for virulence by various mechanisms include AlgR, EspR (regulates gene expression of EspA) and HrpX [2, 46, 47]. Interestingly, EspR has been found to be conserved in M. tuberculosis and M. colombiense [2]. One of the most important aspect of survival of living organisms is metabolism that determines growth or dormancy, several biosynthetic processes including DNA replication and division of cells. Several TFs were found to match with the binding motif MTF1 revealed in this study. RutR, belonging to TetR family, is involved in the regulation of degradation and synthesis of pyrimidines, degradation of purines, glutamine supply, and pH homeostasis by mechanisms that both stimulates and inhibits gene expression at different promoters [48]. ArgR has been found to play a major role in the control of certain biosynthetic and catabolic arginine genes [49]. Integration host factor (IHF) is known to be involved in a large number of cellular functions; however, it plays a major regulatory role during transition from exponential to stationary phase by controlling various cell surface-related functions and downregulating genes encoding ribosomal proteins, the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase, and components of ATP synthase. IHF also controls xylR, which is the master transcriptional factor of the TOL pathway for biodegradation of m-xylene [50]. Mycobacterial infections are known to be difficult to treat due to this switchover from growth to stationary phases. Cell division is a vital process for survival and propagation for living organisms. In this study, we have found two transcription factors MatP (Escherichia coli) and CtrA (Caulobacter crescentus) involved in cell division process taking part in mechanisms such as linking chromosome to the divisome along with ZapA and ZapB, initiation of DNA replication, morphogenesis, DNA methylation, and cell wall metabolism among other functions [51, 52]. In recent years, bacterial cell division has been recognized as a promising new direction for the discovery of antibiotics. Filamenting temperature-sensitive mutant Z (FtsZ) protein has emerged as a promising target for drug discovery. FtsZ is an essential and central protein that has the ability to organize into dynamic polymers at the cell membrane to form a “divisome.” Most cell division inhibitors act via FtsZ, either by interfering with GTPase activity or the assembly/disassembly of the Z-ring, as well as by destabilizing the structure of FtsZ [53]. LexA family transcription factor is involved in transcriptional repressor [54]. Therefore, targeting SOS response might play a central role in promoting survival and the evolution of resistance under antibiotic stress [55]. Identification and understanding of the transcriptional regulatory process by TFs revealed in this study could provide important insights into the development of antimicrobials against M. colombiense CECT 3035 and possibly other NTMs and open gates for further research.

CpG Island is a pattern that plays a crucial role in the analysis of genomes. It consist high-frequency of CpG dinucleotides [56]. CpG islands are DNA methylations regions in promoters known to regulate gene expression through transcriptional silencing of the corresponding gene. DNA methylation at CpG islands is crucial for gene expression and tissue-specific processes [57]. In the present study, an investigation of the CpG islands was performed for both promoter regions and body regions of M. colombiense CECT 3035 genes using CpG island finder and MspI restriction enzyme digestion. Only 5 of 22 genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 genes lack CpG islands in their promoter regions and only 2 of them lack CpG islands in their body regions with GC content greater than 50% and 61.1% in promoter regions and body regions respectively, while all the rest (17 genes, 77.27% promoter gene and 20 genes, 90.91% body regions) contain one possible CpG island. On the other hand, digestion of the promoter regions of M. colombiense CECT 3035 genes with MspI showed 1 gene with single fragment and all the remaining 21 genes with multiple fragments in their promoter regions, whereas CpG islands of 1 genes lacking fragment, 5 genes contain single fragment, CpG islands of 4 genes contain two fragments, and the remaining 12 body region genes were found to contain multiple fragments, respectively. This result is comparable with a recent report with regard to digestion by MspI enzyme (the existence of several fragments (28/29) in promoter regions and several fragments (26/29) in body regions of Herbaspirillum seropedicae genes) [58]. This result implies that the promoter region of M. colombiense CECT 3035 genes have rich CpG islands that can play a crucial role in gene regulation.

The phylogenetic tree generated in this study showed 22 different branches representing different genes. The branching patterns of the tree indicated that a shared evolutionary history existed among the genes with 100% bootstrap. In addition, it is clear that there were different clusters and sister groups those may differ from each other due to base substitutions in the sequences. Hence, knowing these features can contribute significantly to our knowledge on molecular evolution, species phylogeny, and biotechnology [59, 60] which may help in tackling the spread of the bacteria. Furthermore, the close relatedness of the genes is also the characteristics of M. colombiense since study of DNA–DNA relatedness clearly differentiates M. colombiense as separate species within the MAC [61].

Conclusion

M. colombiense is a member of MAC responsible to cause respiratory disease and disseminated infection in immune-compromised patients and lymphadenopathy in immune-competent children. Therefore, understanding of the mechanisms and its components that regulate gene expression is very important in order to tackle the infection of this mycobacterium. TFTRs are known to play diverse regulatory functions including antibiotic resistance, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, quorum sensing, cytokinesis, morphogenesis, osmotic stress, and various metabolic pathways. In this paper, transcription start site, promoter region, binding motifs, and CpG islands of TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 were analyzed. Accordingly, TSSs of 22 genes were identified and five motifs were found to be shared by at least 95.45% genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 promoter input sequences. Among the five motifs, MTF1 was identified as a common promoter motif shared by (100%) TFTR genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 promoters. MTF1 was compared to the known Prokaryotic DNA motif databases and identified to match with 15 out of 84 known motifs. The matched TFs were found to be in good agreement with the regulatory functions of TFTRs and indicated good candidates for the development of antimicrobials including biofilms, quorum signals, siderophores, biosynthesis of cell wall, metabolic states, and cell division and may help to design a combination of therapeutic molecules. These findings are anticipated to provide knowledge for the discovery and development of antimicrobials and possibly next-generation antimicrobials against M. colombiense CECT 3035 and other NTMs as well. Furthermore, analysis of CpG islands showed the existence of a high frequency of CpG islands in both promoter and body regions of genes of M. colombiense CECT 3035 that can have epigenetic regulatory implications while molecular evolutionary genetic analysis showed close relationships among the genes.

Availability of data and materials

Data analyzed in current study were taken from NCBI database of CECT 3035 genes of M. colombiense.

Abbreviations

MAC:

Mycobacterium avium complex

NTM:

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria

RNAP:

RNA polymerase

TFs:

transcription factors

TFTR:

TetR family transcription regulator

CpG:

Cytosine-phosphate-guanine

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

TSS:

Transcription start site

NNPP:

Neural network promoter prediction

MEME:

Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation

MEGA-X:

Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis X

MTF:

Motif

References

  1. Lahiri A, Sanchini A, Semmler T, Schafer H, Lewin A (2014) Identification and comparative analysis of a genomic island in Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis. FEBS Let 588(21):3906–3911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzalez-Perez MN, Murcia MI, Parra-Lopez C, Blom J, Tauch A (2016) Deciphering the virulence factors of the opportunistic pathogen Mycobacterium colombiense. New Microbe New Infect 14:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2016.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maya-Hoyos M, Leguizamon J, Marino-Ramirez L, Soto CY (2015) Sliding motility, biofilm formation, and Glycopeptidolipid production in Mycobacterium colombiense strains. Biomed Res Int 2015:419549. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/419549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gcebe N, Hlokwe TM (2017) Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in south African wildlife: neglected pathogens and potential impediments for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez-Perez M, Marino-Ramirez L, Parra-Lopez CA, Murcia MI, Marquina B, Mata-Espinoza D (2013) Virulence and immune response induced by Mycobacterium avium complex strains in a model of progressive pulmonary tuberculosis and subcutaneous infection in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun 81(11):4001–4012. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00150-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishiuchi Y, Iwamoto T, Maruyama F (2017) Infection sources of a common non-tuberculous mycobacterial pathogen, Mycobacterium avium complex. Front Med 4:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Mahruqi SH, van Ingen J, Al Busaidy S, Boeree MJ, Al Zadjali S, Patel A, Richard Dekhuijzen PN, van Soolingen D (2009) Clinical relevance of nontuberculous mycobacteria, Oman. Emerg Infect Dis 15(2):292–294. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1502.080977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baldwin SL, Larsen SE, Ordway D, Cassell G, Coler RN (2019) The complexities and challenges of preventing and treating nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13(2):e0007083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maurya AK, Nag VL, Kant S, Kushwaha RA, Kumar M, Singh AK, Dhole TN (2015) Prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacteria among extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases in tertiary care centers in northern India. Biomed Res Int 2015:465403. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/465403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma P, Singh D, Sharma K, Verma S, Mahajan S, Kanga A (2018) Are we neglecting nontuberculous mycobacteria just as laboratory contaminants? Time to reevaluate things. J Pathog 2018:8907629. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8907629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez-Perez M, Murcia MI, Landsman D, Jordan IK, Marino-Ramírez L (2011) Genome sequence of the Mycobacterium colombiense type strain, CECT 3035. J Bacteriol 193(20):5866–5867. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.05928-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maurer FP, Pohle P, Kernbach M et al (2019) Differential drug susceptibility patterns of Mycobacterium chimaera and other members of the Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex. Clin Microbiol Infect 25(3):371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.0108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saxena S, Spaink HP, Forn-Cuni G (2021) Drug resistance in nontuberculous mycobacteria: mechanisms and models. Biology 10:96. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10020096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuthbertson L, Nodwell JR (2013) The TetR family of regulators. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77(3):440–475. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00018-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Colclough AL, Scadden J, Blair JMA (2019) TetR-family transcription factors in gram-negative bacteria: conservation, variation and implications for efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. BMC Genomics 20:731. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6075-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Balhana RJ, Singla A, Sikder MH, Withers M, Kendall SL (2015) Global analyses of TetR family transcriptional regulators in mycobacteria indicates conservation across species and diversity in regulated functions. BMC Genomics 16(1):479. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1696-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Soutourina O, Dubois T, Monot M, Shelyakin PV, Saujet L, Boudry P, Gelfand MS, Dupuy B, Martin-Verstraete I (2020) Genome-wide transcription start site mapping and promoter assignments to a sigma factor in the human enteropathogen Clostridioides difficile. Front Microbiol 11(1939):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reese MG, Harris NL, Eeckman FH (1996) Large scale sequencing specific neural networks for promoter and splice site recognition. In: Bio - computing: proceedings of the 1996 Pacific symposium, Singapore http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/promoter.html

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bailey TL, Elkan C (1994) Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 2:28–36 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/377124

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bailey TL, Johnson J, Grant CE, Noble WS (2015) The MEME suite. Nucleic Acids Res 43(W1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng S, Cheng M, Huang K (2018) Efficient computation of motif discovery on Intel many integrated Core (MIC) architecture. BMC Bioinformatics 19(282):102–121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2276-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Bailey TL, Noble WS (2007) Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol 8:R24. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takai D, Jones PA (2002) Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3740–3745. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052410099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:11030–11035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404206101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hall BG (2013) Building phylogenetic trees from molecular data with MEGA. Mol Biol Evol 30(5):1229–1235. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prados J, Linder P, Redder P (2016) TSS-EMOTE, a refined protocol for a more complete and less biased global mapping of transcription start sites in bacterial pathogens. BMC Genomics 17(1):849. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3211-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boutard M, Ettwiller L, Cerisy T, Alberti A, Labadie K, Salanoubat M, Schildkraut I, Tolonean AC (2016) Global repositioning of transcription start sites in a plant-fermenting bacterium. Nat Commun 7(13783):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jorjani H, Zavolan M (2014) TSSer: an automated method to identify transcription start sites in prokaryotic genomes from differential RNA sequencing data. Bioinformatics 30(7):971–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mendoza-Vargas A, Olvera L, Olvera M, Grande R, Vega-Alvarado L, Taboada B et al (2009) Genome-wide identification of transcription start sites, promoters and transcription factor binding sites in E. coli. PLoS One 4(10):e7526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Umarov V, Solovyev R (2017) Prediction of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters using convolutional deep learning neural networks. PLoS One 12:2. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Richard M, Gutiérrez AV, Viljoen AJ, Ghigo E, Blaise M, Kremer L (2018) (2018) mechanistic and structural insights into the unique TetR-dependent regulation of a drug efflux pump in Mycobacterium abscessus. Front Microbiol 9:649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gordon JJ, Towsey MW, Hogan JM, Mathews SA, Timms P (2006) Improved prediction of bacterial transcription start sites. Bioinformatics 22(2):142–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shin MK, Shin SJ (2021) Genetic involvement of Mycobacterium avium complex in the regulation and manipulation of innate immune functions of host cells. Int J Mol Sci 22:3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Falkinham JO III (2018) Challenges of NTM drug development. Front Microbiol 9:1613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang Y, Chen Y, Zhang LH (2020) The roles of microbial cell-cell chemical communication systems in the modulation of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics (Basel) 9(11):779. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Faria S, Joao I, Jordao L (2015) General overview on nontuberculous mycobacteria, biofilms, and human infection. J Pathog 2015:809014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/809014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Simoes M (2011) Antimicrobial strategies effective against infectious bacterial biofilms. Curr Med Chem 18(14):2129–2145. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986711795656216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dong YH, Zhang XF, Xu JL, Tan AT, Zhang LH (2005) VqsM, a novel AraC-type global regulator of quorum-sensing signalling and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 58(2):552–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04851.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang Y, Gao L, Rao X, Wang J, Yu H, Jiang J, Zhou W, Wang J, Xiao Y, Li M, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Shen L, Hua Z (2018) Characterization of lasR-deficient clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 8(1):13344. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30813-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lade H, Paul D, Kweon JH (2014) Quorum quenching mediated approaches for control of membrane biofouling Int. J Biol Sci 10(5):550–565. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.9028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. De Voss JJ, Rutter K, Schroeder BG, Su H, Zhu Y, Barry CE 3rd (2000) The salicylate-derived mycobactin siderophores of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are essential for growth in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(3):1252–1257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.3.1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kopinˇc R, Lapanje A (2012) Antibiotic susceptibility profile of Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis is altered in low-iron conditions. J Antimicrob Chemother 67(12):2903–2907. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Leoni L, Orsi N, Lorenzo V, Visca P (2000) Functional analysis of PvdS, an iron starvation sigma factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 182(6):1481–1491. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.6.1481-1491.2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lizewski SE, Lundberg DS, Schurr MJ (2002) The transcriptional regulator AlgR is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis. Infect Immun 70(11):6083–6093. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.11.6083-6093.2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li Y, Xiao Y, Zou L, Chen G (2012) Identification of HrpX regulon genes in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzicola using a GFP visualization technique. Arch Microbiol 194(4):281–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-011-0758-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nguyen Le Minh P, de Cima S, Bervoets I, Maes D, Rubio V, Charlier D (2015) Ligand binding specificity of RutR, a member of the TetR family of transcription regulators in Escherichia coli. FEBS Open Bio 5:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lu CD, Yang Z, Li W (2004) Transcriptome analysis of the ArgR regulon in Pseudomanas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 186(12):3855–3861. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.12.3855-3861.2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Silva-Rocha R, Chavarría M, Kleijn RJ, Sauer U, de Lorenzo V (2013) The IHF regulon of exponentially growing pseudomonas putida cells. Environ Microbiol 15(1):49–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02750.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mercier R, Petit MA, Schbath S, Karoui ME, Boccard F, Espeli O (2008) The MatP/mats site-specific system organizes the terminus region of the E. coli chromosome into a macrodomain. Cell 135(3):475–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Spencer W, Siam R, Ouimet MC, Bastedo DP, Marczynski GT (2009) CtrA, a global response regulator, uses a distinct second category of weak DNA binding sites for cell cycle transcription control in Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol 191(17):5458–5470. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00355-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Silber N, de Opitz CLM, Mayer C, Sass P (2020) Cell division protein Ftsz: from structure and mechanism to antibiotic target. Future Microbiol 15(9):348. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2019-0348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Adikesavan AK, Katsonis P, Marciano DC, Lua R, Herman C, Lichtarge O (2011) Separation of recombination and SOS response in Escherichia coli RecA suggests LexA interaction sites. PLoS Genet 7(9):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mo CY, Manning SA, Roggiani M, Culyba MJ, Samuels AN, Sriegowski PD, Goulian M, Kohli RM (2016) Systematically altering bacterial SOS activity under stress reveals therapeutic strategies for potentiating antibiotics. mSphere 1(4):e00163–e00116. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00163-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kakumani R, Ahmad O, Devabhaktuni V (2012) Identification of CpG islands in DNA sequences using statistically optimal null filters. EURASTP J Bioinform Syst Biol 2012(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-4153-2012-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lim WJ, Kim KH, Kim JY, Jeong S, Kim N (2019) Identification of DNA-methylated CpG islands associated with gene silencing in the adult body tissues of the Ogye chicken using RNA-Seq and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Front Genet 10:346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Yirgu M, Kebede M (2019) Analysis of the promoter region, motif and CpG islands in AraC family transcriptional regulator ACP92 genes of Herbaspirillum seropedicae. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 10:150–164. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2019.106011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hershberg R, Petrov DA (2008) Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet 42:287–299. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Plotkin JB, Kudla G (2011) Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat Rev Genet 12:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Murcia MI, Tortoli E, Menendez C, Palenque E, Garcia MJ (2006) Mycobacterium colombiense sp. nov., a novel member of the Mycobacterium avium complex and description of MAC-X as a new ITS genetic variant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56(9):2049–2054. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64190-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge School of Applied Natural Science, Adama Science and Technology University.

Funding

School of Applied Natural Science, Adama Science and Technology University financially supported the authors only during the study, not in other activities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Biology, School of Applied Natural Science, Adama Science and Technology University, P.O. Box 1888, Adama, Ethiopia

    Feyissa Hamde, Hunduma Dinka & Mohammed Naimuddin

Authors
  1. Feyissa Hamde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hunduma Dinka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammed Naimuddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors designed and performed the study. FH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. HD initiated the study. HD and MN supervised the research. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feyissa Hamde or Mohammed Naimuddin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamde, F., Dinka, H. & Naimuddin, M. In silico analysis of promoter regions to identify regulatory elements in TetR family transcriptional regulatory genes of Mycobacterium colombiense CECT 3035. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 20, 53 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-022-00331-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-022-00331-6

Keywords