Skip to main content

Bioinformatics study of phytase from Aspergillus niger for use as feed additive in livestock feed

Abstract

Background

Phytase supplementation in rations can reduce their phytic acid composition in order to enhance their nutritional value. Aspergillus niger is a fungus that can encode phytase. This study aims to determine the characteristics of its DNA sequences and amino acid composition that encode the phytase enzyme, as well as to determine the primer designs.

Method

This study used gene sequence data and protein-encoding phytase from Aspergillus niger that was collected manually from NCBI and PDB. The data was analyzed using SPDBV and then be aligned using the ClustalW Multiple Alignment features. The phylogenetic tree was built by Mega11 software. Primers were designed from selected candidate sequences that were analyzed. The designed primers were then simulated for PCR using FastPCR and SnapGene software.

Results

There are 18 Aspergillus niger phytases in NCBI which is 14.87% of the total Aspergillus. There are 14 Aspergillus niger phytases that have identity above 95%. Aspergillus niger 110. M94550.1 is the closest strain to the PDB template. Candidate sources of phytase genes are Aspergillus niger 110.M94550.1, 48.2.BCMY01000003.1, and 92.JQ654450.1. The primer design has 2 possibilities of self-annealing and high melting temperature on the reverse primer. PCR simulation shows that the primer design can attach completely but still has the possibility of mispriming.

Conclusion

This study suggests promising results for the future development of phytase enzyme production from Aspergillus niger as a feed additive using genetic engineering to enhance the quality of livestock feed in Indonesia.

Background

Feed is the primary energy source for livestock to carry and support the maintenance and productivity [1]. Indonesia used feed from agricultural products and its by-products, which have high phytic acid concentration [2]. Phytic acid (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate) is a form of phosphorus storage in the feed crops such as grains, cereals and legumes [3]. Phytic acid is an antinutrient, especially for monogastric [4]. Phytic acid can bind other minerals such as Fe, Mg, Zn, Ca, and nutrition such as protein [4, 5]. Therefore, it might inhibit the absorption of the protein and minerals in the feed [3, 6]. Phytase supplementation is important for feed quality and therefore feed efficiency [7]. Phytase enzymes are still limited in Indonesia. In Indonesia, the technology, people, and material resources are still inadequate to produce their own phytase. However, Indonesia has the potential to produce phytase using native gene sources [8].

Phytase (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases) is an enzyme that catalyzes the release of phosphate from phytic acid [3, 8]. Phytase is widely used to overcome the problem of phytic acid and can be used as a feed additive for monogastric. Previous studies showed that phytase can improve nutrient absorption, especially P and Ca, reduce dependence on the use of mineral source feed additives, and reduce the environmental impact of monogastric due to the excretion of phytic acid in the feces [3, 7]. Phytase initiates stepwise removal of phosphate by decreasing their phosphorus excretion from phytate [3]. A. niger, A. oryzae, F. venenatum, S. cereviciae, P. pastoris, K. lactis, P. griseoroseum, and E. coli have been identified as host strain of phytases from fungal and bacteria isolates [9].

One of the methods to produce phytase is by genetic engineering using fungi. Aspergillus niger has been extensively reported in various literature as a fungus that can encode phytase (phyA and phyB) [8]. Based on its catalytic activity, A. niger phytase belongs to the histidine acid phosphatase (HAP) group [4, 10], which has activity under acidic conditions and is widely used as a hydrolyzer of phytic acid in animal feed [3]. The Aspergillus family has an active site motif -RHGXRXP- for catalysis and attachment and an -HD- motif for substrate attachment and product release [11]. The phytase production by fungi has been achieved through the use of solid-state and submerged fermentation methods [8, 12]. The first generation of commercial phytase was a fungal phytase from Aspergillus niger introduced in 1991 and marketed under the name Natuphos [13].

Bioinformatics study is an initial step of genetic and protein engineering [14]. This study allows some genetic engineering to be simulated by certain software and produce various kinds of data for genetic engineering [15, 16]. These data include the sequence and structure of genes and proteins, the level of kinship (phylogenetics), and the active site of the protein (enzyme). Therefore, this study aims to determine the characteristics of its DNA sequences and amino acid composition that encode the phytase enzyme, as well as the primer designs for it. Primer design can be used in further genetic engineering processes such as the isolation of target genes from the genome of the microbial gene source and identification of the presence of genes encoding target enzymes to show the potential of fungi in producing enzymes.

Methods

The 3D structure of phytase

The 3D structure of phytase was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) in (.pdb) format. The data obtained is information about the target enzyme, in this case, phytase from A. niger. The collected data was then combined with relevant literature for further study. The data was then analyzed using Swiss Protein Data Bank Viewer (SPDBV) software to determine the active sites and to observe the phytase enzyme protein structure in detail [14]. The obtained phytase protein sequences were then used as a template on sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis.

Sequence data collection

The data of Aspergillus was collected manually from the gene bank of the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [14, 17]. Then the data is numbered based on the order in which the data was found. This helps us while analyzing DNA and protein sequences. The data used in this bioinformatics study is the coding region data (CDS) of DNA sequences and amino acids from A. niger. The sequence data was obtained and stored in the form of FASTA (.fas).

Sequence alignment

Sequence alignment was performed using BioEdit software. A. niger DNA and protein sequence data will then be aligned using the ClustalW Multiple Alignment features [18]. The alignment data is then stored in the form of Genbank files (.gb) and FASTA (.fas).

The phylogenetic tree

The phylogenetic tree was designed using the Mega11 software. The CDS sequence data that has been aligned and entered into the software will be processed using the construct/test maximum likelihood tree feature. The substitution method used in making this phylogenetic is the kimura parameter model 2 [19]. The kimura parameter model 2 was used for the substitution method in constructing this phylogenetic tree. The resulting tree will be analyzed to determine the degree of kinship between sequences. A high level of kinship and homology will be considered when selecting candidate sequences.

Primer design

Primer design was made with the help of primer 3 + software using predetermined candidate sequences. Primer designs are made using complementary reverse start and end codons from the specified candidate CDS data. So, the A. niger phytase enzyme can be completely encoded. There are several criteria in making primers in this study, including the base pairs (bp) length between 18 and 30 bp and GC content between 45 and 60% [20]. The most optimal primers were then revalidated using oligocalculator software from http://biotools.nubic.northwestern.edu/OligoCalc.html. The software was set to identify hairpin and self-dimerization with a minimum of 3 bp.

Primer simulation

The designed primers were then simulated for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using FastPCR and SnapGene software [20, 21]. In silico simulation by FastPCR software is used to indicate the melting temperature, annealing temperature, and amplicon size that will be produced. FastPCR set by 0 mismatches to indicate the primers can anneal perfectly. SnapGene software is used to see the possibility of how primers anneal by showing the picture of PCR.

Results

3D structure

Based on PDB observations, we obtained the protein structure of phytase enzymes derived from A. niger 3k4q and 3k4p consisting of 444 amino acids. The protein secondary structure and peptide molecular structure accompanied by myo-Inositol hexasulfate (IHS) projection on the structure of A. niger 3k4q (Fig. 1). The active site is located in the gap between the large α-helix/β-sheet domain and the small α-helix domain (Fig. 1A). A close-up view of phytase (Fig. 1C) clarifies the location of the active site in the overall protein. Sulfate groups bind to Y28, R58, H59, R62, R142, K278, H338, and D339 residue (Fig. 1B). Therefore, there is no direct interaction between the enzyme and the inositol ring.

Fig. 1
figure 1

3D structure observation using SPDBV. A Secondary structure β-sheet shown by purple, α-helix by light blue, and loops by white (green on C). B The creatine phosphokinase (CPK) format consists of red for oxygen, blue for nitrogen, orange for phosphate, green for hydrogen bonds, and white to show amino acid molecular bonds

Data collection

Based on Aspergillus phytase data contained in NCBI (data not shown). Aspergillus phytase consists of 121 data. There is 18 (14.87% total) of phytase data from 17 A. niger (Table 1). Some A. niger data were whole genome shotgun sequences and CDS with a range of 1404–2071 bp and 467–522aa originating from China and India while most of the data were not mentioned.

Table 1 Sequence characteristics based on A. niger 3k4p

Sequence alignment

In addition, multiple sequence alignments were performed to find a conserved motif in the DNA sequences. A total of 18 phytases were aligned with A. niger 3k4p as a base template (Fig. 2). A. niger phytase is well conserved as indicated by the dot mark. Characteristics sequence based on A. niger 3k4p also shows in (Table 1). There are 14 organisms with an identity to each other of 95% (Fig. 2). Phytase A. niger 3k4p has the closest kinship with phytase 110. AAA32705.1 and shows 95% identical. Phytase 113.AAA16897.1 and 107.AAA02934.1 had an identity with each other of 98.8% and were the most distantly related A. niger phytase followed by 48.1.GAQ37582.1 and 49.GAQ46510.1. Both have identities with templates below 22%. Based on the alignment of 14 A. niger phytase, the mutations were found in the phytase sequence (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Diagram of the amino acid (top) and gene (bottom) alignment. The red box shows the active site motif in the sequence

Table 2 Mutated sequence fragment from A. niger phytase

Phylogenetic tree analysis

The phylogenetic analysis showed the classification that aims to estimate the evolutionary relationship of an organism [22]. We found that both the DNA and amino acid sequence of A. niger phytase are divided into 4 groups as shown in (Fig. 3). A. niger 110.M94550.1 was the closest source to the template.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree based on amino acids (top) and genes (bottom)

Primer design

We selected three candidates based on kindship and homology of sequences. There are A. niger 110.M94550.1, 48.2.BCMY01000003.1, and 92.JQ654450.1 (Table 3). The complementary reverse start and end codons of the three primer designs are quite identical to each other. All secondary structures showed good results with only 2 and 3 possibilities of self-annealing and no hairpin possibility occurred (Table 4).

Table 3 Primer design results with Primer3 + (P3) and oligocalculator (Olc)
Table 4 Results of the analysis of primary secondary structures

Primer simulation

The PCR simulation using FastPCR shows that all three primers have a maximum amplicon size and high annealing temperature (Table 5). PCR simulation using Snapgene shows all primer designs still have the possibility of mispriming. This is indicated by the disconnected arrow (Fig. 4).

Table 5 Results of PCR simulation using FastPCR
Fig. 4
figure 4

PCR simulation of Snapgene phytase A. niger 4.8.2.BCMY01000003.1 (A), 92.JQ654450.1 (B), and 110.M94550.1 (C). Forward primer (orange), reverse primer (green)

Discussion

Enzymes are proteins that act as biocatalysts for a reaction. İt is a macromolecule composed of amino acids and is synthesized by nucleotides by encoding nitrogenous bases into amino acids. Phytase 3k4p has a complex structure and good stability shown by the dominance of the α-helix amino acid structure. The dominance of the α-helix structure indicates that the protein is non-polar/hydrophobic and results in good stability. A previous study reported that the α-helix domain plays a role in stabilizing amino acid residues in A. niger phytase [11]. The α-helix structure is a secondary structure that can improve thermal stability with a critical role in energy dissipation [23, 24]. However, the active site is stiffer than bacterial HAPs, because the α-helix on the C-terminus of the RHGXRXP-containing loop is shorter than bacterial HAPs [25]. Active site flexibility is considered a requirement for lowering the free energy barrier, improving active site accessibility, and accelerating catalytic efficiency [26].

The active site of phytase A. niger contains five disulfide bonds. Most of them are located on loops near the surface of the phytase protein [10]. Residues contact IHS via hydrogen bonds with all sulfate groups except 6-sulfate. IHS is an inhibitor used to analogize phytic acid or IHP. The IHS is isosteric and isoelectronic with myo-inositol hexaphosphate (IHP) [11]. The phytic acid in feed is attracted by hydrogen bonds and then interacts and reacts directly with amino acid residues through phosphate groups, thus forming a covalent phospho-histidine intermediate bond [25]. This process is then followed by hydrolysis and release of histidine residues.

Our present study found that Aspergillus can encode two phytases. This can be attributed to the fact that A. niger is a eukaryotic fungus. A. niger 48.1 is still in the form of phytase precursor and 48.2 is already in the form of phytase. This is possible because the first phytase carries a signal peptide that will determine the location of the expression of phytase, which is outside the cell [27]. So that the new phytase will be active after this signal peptide is released when it finishes delivering phytase to its place of expression. The second phytase will be expressed inside the cell.

Analysis of the amino acid sequences of gene and amino acid aims to identify the conserved motif of phytase from A. niger. The identity has a good result as shown before, with conserved histidine as a part of a catalytic site [4]. High identity showed a highly similar product as the template based on the presence of a conserved motif, indicating that the sequence is a part of histidine acid phosphates (HAP) [8]. Alanine replaces the glycine motif on phytase 49.GAQ46510.1 and did not present a conserved signature motif in the amino acid sequences indicating that the phytase may not be from these isolates of histidine phosphatase. This makes the active site molecule slightly stiffer but, more stable. In addition, alanine is more hydrophobic (as indicated by the greater hydropathy value) and larger relative molecule mass than glycine [28].

The present study found phytases have similarities in the mutations. These similarities are then taken into consideration in determining the candidate source of A. niger phytase. A. niger is a HAP enzyme with characteristic motif –RHGXRXP– and –HD– [11, 25]. Therefore, deliberate mutation can only be performed on amino acid X (unknown/other) which based on the result is shown by alanine and tyrosine. Both amino acids can be converted into uncharged or aromatic non-polar amino acids such as valine and phenylalanine [4, 28].

Phylogenetics based on A. niger phytase gene sequences showed these results were not much different from those shown by phylogenetic trees made based on amino acids. This is the sequence representative within a clade constitute reference [29]. Therefore, the candidate phytase gene source of A. niger 110.M94550.1 was obtained, which is the most identical gene source to A. niger 3k4p, as well as 48.2.BCMY01000003.1 and 92.JQ654450.1 that are the best representative of the gene source group that has certain characteristic mutations.

The three primer designs are quite identical with a low secondary structure. This also lowers mispriming due to complementation between primers or between forward and reverse primers such as self-annealing, hairpin, and nonspecific amplification [30]. The limitation of the primer design is the annealing temperature on primers was the same as the extension temperature. Annealing temperature ranges from 45 to 60 °C and 72 °C for extension temperature [31]. The high annealing temperature certainly causes the attachment to be not optimal because the primer is difficult to anneal [32]. Based on PCR simulation using Snapgene, all the designs still have mispriming possibilities. This can be caused by the presence of repetition of the same base in the sequence. Base repetition can also cause breathing of the primer [32]. These factors can reduce primer specificity and allow mispriming. However, the maximum amplicon result on FastPCR tells us that all the designs were able to fully bind to the template and produce products. This indicates that these designs yielded good results. The use of longer primers is one of the things that can be done to reduce the possibility of mispriming [30, 32]. We suggest these primers only be used to identify the source of the phytase gene. The primer usability to produce phytase should be directly tested first. Despite the limitation of the result, this study is an initial and important step to produce phytase using genetic and protein engineering in its implementation.

To summarize, as a result of the bioinformatics study it was found that the A. niger phytase has a stable protein structure. There are 14 A. niger phytases that have identities above 95%. A. niger 110. M94550.1 is the closest strain to the PDB template. Most of the A. niger phytase sequences are well conserved. The phytase gene source candidates obtained were A. niger 110.M94550.1, which was the only phytase that did not have mutations against the PDB template, and A. niger 48.2.BCMY01000003.1 and 92.JQ654450.1 was the best representative of the gene source group that had certain characteristics. Primer design in this study produced the best primer set with a forward primer length of 19 bp and a reverse primer with a length of 24 bp with 1404 bp amplicons. The produced primer designs were able to fully bind to the template and, however, still show some possibility of mispriming so it can only be used to identify the source of the phytase gene.

Conclusions

Phytase A. niger has a good characteristic with stable protein and high identity. However, the resulting primer design still shows the possibility of mispriming. This indicates the high potential for further development, especially the production of phytase enzymes from A. niger as a feed additive using genetic engineering in an effort to develop the quality of animal feed in Indonesia. Therefore, this study needs to be studied further so that the potential can be explored and utilized optimally.

Availability of data and materials

The phytase sequence of the A. niger template is available in the Protein Data Bank (ID: 3k4p and 3k4q). The complete DNA sequence and the corresponding annotation of A. niger is available in the NCBI Genbank (accession number BCMY01000003.1; BCMY01000021.1; AB022700.1; JQ654450.1; JQ654449 0.1; AY426977.1; AY745739.1; L02421.1; JQ241266.1; EF197825.1; L20567.1; AY513749.1; M94550.1; JN196454.1; AF218813.1; L02420.1; EU786167.1) The complete amino acid sequence and the corresponding annotation of A. niger is available in the NCBI Genbank (accession number GAQ37582.1; GAQ37712.1; GAQ46510.1; BAA74433.1; AFJ79736 0.1; AFJ79735.1; AAR08366.1; AAU93518.1; AAA16898.1; AFE56108.1; ABM92786.1; AAA02934.1; AAS00648.1; AAA32705.1; AET71192.1; AAF25481.1; AAA16897.1; ACE79229.1).

Abbreviations

A. niger:

Aspergillus niger

HAP:

Histidine acid phosphatase

PDB:

Protein data bank

NCBI:

National Center of Biotechnology Information

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

CDS:

Coding data sequence

SPDBV:

Swiss Protein Data Bank Viewer

Bp:

Base pair

aa:

Amino acid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

IHS:

Myo-inositol hexasulfate

IHP:

Myo-inositol hexaphosphate

CPK:

Creatine phosphokinase

Olc:

Oligocalculator

P3 + :

Primer 3 + 

Tm:

Melting temperature

TA:

Annealing temperature

SA:

Self-annealing

SC:

Self complementary

C:

Complementary

References

  1. Fatima I, Safdar N, Akhtar W, Munir A, Saqib S, Ayaz A, Bahadur S, Alrefaei AF, Ullah F, Zaman, (2023) Evaluation of potential inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase, pancreatic lipase, and cancer cell lines using raw leaves extracts of three fabaceae species. Heliyon 9:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yuan HB, Tang RC, Yu CB (2021) Flame Retardant functionalization of microcrystalline cellulose by phosphorylation reaction with phytic acid. Int J Mol Sci 22(17):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar V, Sinha AK, Kajbaf K (2019) Phytic acid and phytase enzyme. In: Johnson J, Wallace TC (eds) Whole Grains and Their Bioactives: Composition and Health, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Hoboken, pp 467–483

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Elkhateeb YAM, Fadel M (2021) Bioinformatic studies, experimental validation of phytase production and optimization of fermentation condition for enhancing phytatse enzyme production by different microorganisms under solid-state fermentation. Open Microbiol J 16:1–11. https://doi.org/10.2174/18742858-v16-e2202160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duliński R, Zdaniewicz M, Pater A, Poniewska D, Żyła K (2020) The impact of phytases on the release of bioactive inositols, the profile of inositol phosphates, and the release of selected minerals in the technology of buckwheat beer production. Biomolecules 10(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi J, Kim SH (2017) A genome Tree of Life for the fungi kingdom. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:9391–9396. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711939114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Houshyar M, Saki AA, Alikhani MY, Bedford MR, Soleimani M, Kamareheiy F (2023) Approaches to determine the efficiency of novel 3-phytase from Klebsiella pneumoniae and commercial phytase in broilers from 1 to 14 d of age. Poult Sci 102(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mkumbe BS, Sajidan PA, Susilowati A, Greiner R (2022) Production, characterization, and molecular phylogenetic analysis of phytase from Aspergillus niger isolates of an indonesia origin. Hayati J Biosci 29(4):468–477. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.29.4.468-478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corrêa TLR, de Araújo EF (2020) Fungal phytases: from genes to applications. Braz J Microbiol 51:1009–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-020-00289-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cangussu ASR, Almeida DA, Aguiar RWS, Barbosa LCB, Cangussu EWS, Brandi IV, Portella ACF, Santos GF, Sobrinho EM, Lima WJN (2017) Characterization of the Catalytic Structure of Plant Phytase, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-Like Phytase, and Histidine Acid Phytases and Their Biotechnological Applications. J mycol 2018:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8240698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oakley AJ (2010) The structure of Aspergillus niger phytase phyA in complex with a phytate mimetic. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 397:45–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neira-Vielma AA, Aguilar CN, Ilyina A, Contreras-Esquivel JC, Carbeiro-de-Cunha M, Michelena-Alvarez G, Martinez-Hernandez JL (2018) Purification and biochemical characterization of an Aspergillus niger phytase produced by solid-state fermentation using triticale residues as substrate. Biotechnol Rep 17:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Niño-Gómez DC, Rivera-Hoyos CM, Morales-Álvarez ED, Reyes-Montaño EA, Vargas-Alejo NE, Ramírez-Casallas IN, Türkmen KE, Sáenz-Suárez H, Sáenz-Moreno JA, Poutou-Piñales RA, González-Santos J, Arévalo-Galvis A (2017) (In silico) characterization of 3-phytase A and 3-phytase B from Aspergillus niger. Enzyme Res 2017:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9746191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mustopa AZ, Meilina L, Irawan S, Ekawati N, Fathurahman AT, Triratna L, Kusumawati A, Prastyowati A, Nurfatwa M, Hertati A, Harmoko R (2022) Construction, expression, and in vitro assembly of virus-like particles of L1 protein of human papillomavirus type 52 in Escherichia coli BL21 DE3. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 20(19):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00281-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaman W, Ye J, Ahmad M, Saqib S, Shinwari ZK, Chen Z (2022) Phylogenetic Exploration of Traditional Chinese Medical Plants: A Case Study on Lamiaceae. Pak J Bot 54(3):1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2022-3(19)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadiqi S, Hamza M, Ali F, Alam S, Shakeela Q, Ahmed S, Ayaz A, Ali S, Saqib S, Ullah F, Zaman W (2022) Molecular Characterization of Bacterial Isolates from Soil Samples and Evaluation of their Antibacterial Potential against MDRS. Molecules 27(19):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farias N, Almeida I, Meneses C (2018) New bacterial phytase through metagenomic prospection. Molecules 23(2):448. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parekh P, Tang Z, Turner PC, Moyer RW, Tan W (2010) Aptamers recognizing glycosylated hemagglutinin expressed on the surface of vaccinia virus-infected cells. Anal Chem 82(20):8642–8649. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101801j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gross E, van Iersel L, Janssen R, Jones M, Long C, Murakami Y (2021) Distinguishing level-1 phylogenetic networks on the basis of data generated by Markov processes. J Math Biol 83(32):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-021-01653-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamel AA (2003) Bioinformatic tools and guideline for PCR primer design. Afr J Biotechnol 2(5):1–5. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2003.000-1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simkhah M, Dehghan EMJ, Zeinoddini M, Pourmahdi N (2019) Simple and rapid detection of Burkholderia and Variolla using multiplex-PCR. Res Mol Med 7(3):39–46. https://doi.org/10.32598/rmm.7.3.39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brinkman FSL, Leipe DD (2001) Phylogenetic analysis. In: Baxevanis AD, Oulette BFF (eds) Bioinformatics a Practical Guide to The Analysis of Genes and Proteins, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Toronto, pp 323–357

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J, Zhang D, Xiao J, Wu X (2022) Effects of Enzymatic Modification and Cross-Linking with Sodium Phytate on the Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Cyperus esculentus Starch. Foods 11(17):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tavakol M, Vaughan TJ (2020) The structural role of osteocalcin in bone biomechanics and its alteration in Type-2 Diabetes. Sci Rep 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73141-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen C, Cheng K, Ko T, Guo R (2015) Current progresses in phytase research: three-dimensional structure and protein engineering. CHEMBIOENG REV 2(2):76–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201400026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kokkinidis M, Glykos NM, Fadouloglou VE (2012) Protein Flexibility and Enzymatic Catalysis. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 87:181–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398312-1.00007-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Armenteros JJA, Tsirigos K, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2019) SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol 37(4):420–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z

  28. Nelson LD, Cox MM (2017) Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins. In, Nelson LD and Cox MM (eds) Lehninger: Principles of Biochemistry Seventh Edition, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, pp 197–215

  29. Saqib S, Zaman W, Ayaz A, Habib S, Bahadur S, Hussain S, Muhammad S, Ullah F (2020) Postharvest disease inhibition in fruit by synthesis and characterization of chitosan iron oxide nanoparticles. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 28:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yin Z, Ramshani Z, Waggoner JJ, Pinsky BA, Senapati S, Chang HC (2020) A non-optical multiplexed PCR diagnostic platform for serotype-specific detection of dengue virus. Sens Actuators B Chem 310:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.127854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar A, Kaur J (2014) Primer based approach for PCR amplification of high GC content gene: Mycobacterium gene as a model. Mol Biol Int 2014:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/937308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sasmito DEK, Kurniawan R, Muhimmah I (2014) Karakteristik primer pada polymerase chain reaction (PCR) untuk sekuensing DNA: Mini review. Paper presented at Seminar Nasional Informatika Medis (SNIMed), University of Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 6 December 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), 16911, Cibinong, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia for providing financial support to carry out this research.

Funding

This research has been supported by the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), 16911, Cibinong, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. This research received no grant from any funding agency/sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HM, YW, NH, AH, ASHA, LT, and NM conceived and planned the research. HM, LT, and NM carried out the data collection and observation. HM, NM, LT, YW, NH, AH, and ASHA contributed to the interpretation of the results. HM took the lead in writing the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Novi Mayasari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Department of Nutrition and Feed Technology, 45363, Jatinangor, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia (Approval no: 0321030200).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maulana, H., Widyastuti, Y., Herlina, N. et al. Bioinformatics study of phytase from Aspergillus niger for use as feed additive in livestock feed. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 21, 142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00600-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00600-y

Keywords