Skip to main content
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cover Image
Download PDF

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ER membrane protein complex subunit 4 (EMC4) plays a crucial role in eIF2B-mediated translation regulation and survival under stress conditions

Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology volume 18, Article number: 15 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) initiates and regulates translation initiation in eukaryotes. eIF2B gene mutations cause leukoencephalopathy called vanishing white matter disease (VWM) in humans and slow growth (Slg−) and general control derepression (Gcd−) phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Results

To suppress eIF2B mutations, S. cerevisiae genomic DNA library was constructed in high-copy vector (YEp24) and transformed into eIF2B mutant S. cerevisiae strains. The library was screened for wild-type genes rescuing S. cerevisiae (Slg−) and (Gcd−) phenotypes. A genomic clone, Suppressor-I (Sup-I), rescued S. cerevisiae Slg− and Gcd− phenotypes (gcd7-201 gcn2∆). The YEp24/Sup-I construct contained truncated TAN1, full length EMC4, full length YGL230C, and truncated SAP4 genes. Full length EMC4 (chaperone protein) gene was sub-cloned into pEG (KG) yeast expression vector and overexpressed in gcd7-201 gcn2∆ strain which suppressed the Slg− and Gcd− phenotype. A GST-Emc4 fusion protein of 47 kDa was detected by western blotting using α-GST antibodies. Suppression was specific to gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutation in eIF2Bβ and Gcd1-502 gcn2∆ in eIF2Bγ subunit. Emc4p overexpression also protected the wild type and mutant (gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2∆) strains from H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that Emc4p is involved in eIF2B-mediated translational regulation under stress and could provide an amenable tool to understand the eIF2B-mediated defects.

Background

Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) a heterodecameric complex of five non-identical protein subunits (α–ε) initiates/regulates translation [1]. α, β, and δ subunits of eF2B constitute regulatory sub complex, while the γ and ε subunits form catalytic sub complex [2]. eIF2B initiates translation by catalyzing the GDP-GTP exchange on its substrate, eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). Under stress, eIF2B tightly binds to the phosphorylated eIF2 [2,3,4] which reduces eIF2B activity, and a transcription-activating factor GCN4 in S. cerevisiae and ATF4 in humans are translated [5, 6] inducing various stress response genes [7]. Mutations in eIF2B subunits cause a neurodegenerative disease, called VWM (leukoencephalopathy with vanishing white matter) [8,9,10]. In VWM patients, eIF2B GEF activities are generally lower than normal [11] and is insensitive to eIF2 (loss of eIF2B-eIF2 interaction) [12,13,14]. Low eIF2B activity induces GCN4/ATF4 even in absence of eIF2 phosphorylation [15,16,17,18,19] and induces stress-like conditions. Neurological disorder further provokes additional stress and white matter deterioration.

Regulatory subunits of eIF2B are important for eI2B-eIF2 interaction under normal and stress conditions. Archeal eIF2B interacts with eukaryotic eIF2α and eIF2Bα indicating the importance of regulatory subunits [20]. eIF2Bβ subunit binds eIF2 which is important for eIF2-eIF2B interaction and translation regulation [21]. During integrated stress response, mutations in eIF2Bβ subunit suppress translation and cause delay in the recovery [22]. Identifying extragenic suppressors, modulators (proteins/chemicals) of mutated eIF2B regulatory subunits, may be useful in curing VWM disease. The chemical modulators, activating either GCN4 or suppressing eIF2B mutations, have been previously identified [23]. The goal of our study was to identify the S. cerevisiae protein that interacts with mutated eIF2B subunit and suppresses the mutation.

eIF2B mutant S. cerevisiae strains with deletion of protein kinase Gcn2p (phosphorylates eIF2α) gene give general control derepression phenotype (Gcd− phenotype) and slow growth (Slg−) phenotype. In Gcd− phenotype, GCN4 is activated even in absence of eIF2α phosphorylation. The qualitative measurement of eIF2B activity and GCN4 activation in gcn2 Δ strains can be measured in vivo on 3-amino triazole (3-AT) plates. 3-Amino triazole (3-AT) is a histidine analog and causes amino acid (histidine) starvation in S. cerevisiae-activating Gcn2p kinase and Gcn4p expression. If there are mutations in eIF2B subunit genes in gcn2∆ strains, the GEF activity of eIF2B is reduced. This reduction in eIF2B GEF activity helps in the growth of S. cerevisiae strains on medium containing 3-AT. This assay is used for indirect expression of Gcn4p.

In the present study, overexpression of a wild-type S. cerevisiae chaperone protein ER transmembrane complex 4 (Emc4p) rescued both the Slg− and Gcd− phenotypes of S. cerevisiae strains containing mutations either in β (gcd7-201) or γ (gcd1-502) subunits. Here we observed that Emc4p overexpression confers resistant to the H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress, in mutant or wild-type cells. We proposed a model that Emc4p by its chaperone activity folds and stabilize the destabilized and unfolded eIF2Bβ and eIF2Bγ subunits. However, it is unclear why Emc4p cannot suppress the mutations in other subunits of eIF2B. But this clearly suggests that interaction of both the subunits eIF2Bβ and eIF2γ with each other is critical for eIF2B activity, and mutations in any of these subunits can cause VWM disease.

Methods

All the chemicals and reagents were of molecular biology grade procured from Thermo scientific, Himedia Labs, India; MP Biomedicals, USA; Fermentas Inc. USA; and Bio-Rad. USA.

S. cerevisiae strains and plasmids

S. cerevisiae strains employed in this study (Table S1) were cultured on YPD agar or liquid medium. S. cerevisiae transformants were selected on synthetic complete (SC) medium lacking uracil and supplemented with glucose/galactose/raffinose. S. cerevisiae strains were incubated at 30 °C. E. coli strain DH5α was used for S. cerevisiae genomic DNA library construction and plasmid isolation.

YEp24 (high copy shuttle vector) and pEG(KG) (yeast expression vector) were used for cloning and expression of S. cerevisiae genes respectively. Nutrient broth (NB, Himedia Labs, Mumbai) with 100 μg/ml ampicillin was used to culture the E. coli strain DH5α harboring YEp24 or pEG(KG) at 37 °C. Plasmid DNA of YEp24 and pEG(KG) were isolated and used in transformations of yeast strains [24, 25].

Construction of S. cerevisiae genomic DNA library and transformation into eIF2B mutant S. cerevisiae strains

Genomic DNA from S. cerevisiae strain H4 (Table S1) was isolated and partially digested with Sau3AI enzyme [24]. Fifty nanograms of partially digested and gel purified (gel purification kit Thermo-scientific) genomic DNA was ligated with 20 μg of YEp24 vector at BamHI site using T4 DNA ligase [26]. After ligation at 16 °C for 16 h, E. coli strain DH5α was transformed with the ligation mix by heat shock method [24]. The transformation mix was plated on NA medium containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml). Transformations were selected against ampicillin resistance on NA medium containing ampicillin and were pooled into three groups named as pool-I, pool-II, and pool-III.

Plasmid DNA isolation from three pools indicating ~ 13,575 cfu (colony-forming units) of transformants of DH5α was done [24]. Plasmids isolated from all three pools or vector (YEp24) alone were transformed into S. cerevisiae eIF2B mutant strains (Figure S1). The wild-type strains were transformed with YEp24 vector alone using LiAc method [25]. The nomenclature used for various S. cerevisiae strains used in this study is given in (Table S2). Transformation mix was plated on synthetic complete (SC) medium containing 2% glucose lacking uracil. SC mixture lacking uracil was used as a dropout supplement to select transformants containing uracil-based plasmid. eIF2B mutant S. cerevisiae transformants with normal colony size were compared to that of vector-transformed eIF2B mutant strains and wild-type strains by streaking and spot assay on synthetic complete (SC) medium containing 2% glucose lacking uracil [27].

Screening of suppressor protein

eIF2Bβ (gcd7-201 gcn2∆) transformants showing Slg+ phenotype as that of isogenic wild type were selected and analyzed for Gcd+ phenotype by spot assay on SC-medium supplemented with 30 mM 3-AT (3-amino triazole). Transformants showing Slg+ and Gcd+ phenotype were further screened by spot assay of 10-fold serially diluted culture and by streaking.

Plasmid DNA from the potential gcd7-201 gcn2∆ transformants (Slg+, Gcd+) were isolated [28], and gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant S. cerevisiae strain were transformed with the rescued plasmid. Simultaneously, the rescued plasmid was sequenced on both the strands at Eurofins Bangalore, (http://www.eurofins.in/) by using YEp24 vector specific primers (S7).

Functional characterization of suppressor protein

EMC4 gene from rescued plasmid was amplified using gene-specific primers (Table S3) followed by sub-cloning into pEG(KG) yeast expression vector (containing a GAL1 promoter and a protease cleavable N-terminal GST tag) at XbaI/SalI restriction sites. Gal promoter is repressed by raffinose and induced by galactose.

DH5α was transformed with recombinant plasmids (100 ng) by heat shock method [24]. Rescued plasmid DNA from transformants was sequenced at Eurofins Bangalore, (http://www.eurofins.in/). An error free nucleotide sequence of EMC4 DNA was obtained. pEG(KG)/EMC4 plasmids were transformed into gcd7-201 gcn2∆ strain by LiAc method in order to confirm the Slg+ and Gcd+ phenotype. The transformation mix was plated on SC medium supplemented with uracil and 2% galactose. gcd7-201 gcn2∆ and GCD7 gcn2∆ transformed with pEG(KG) vector alone were used as control.

Plasmid DNA isolation from the recombinant clones was done as described [28] and was transformed again in gcd7-201 gcn2∆. Spot assay of pEG(KG)/EMC4 transformants was performed in order to confirm the Slg+ and Gcd+ phenotype. GST-EMC4-based suppression was also confirmed by eviction of pEG(KG) a uracil-based plasmid containing GST-EMC4 on 5-fluoroorotic acid (FOA) containing medium. 5-Flouroorotic acid (5-FOA) is converted to a toxic product (5-floorouracil) by URA3 gene product. Thus, S. cerevisiae cells containing URA3 marker cannot grow on medium containing 5-FOA but are able to grow on medium lacking uracil. Thus, FOA is used to select for the loss of vectors carrying the wild-type URA marker [29]. Colonies from FOA plate were picked and streaked on SC medium without uracil and supplemented with 2% galactose. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2 days and were observed for growth phenotype.

Western blot analysis

The whole cell extract of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ harboring either pEG(KG) or pEG(KG)/EMC4 was prepared by glass bead lysis method using Fast Prep (MP Biomedicals). gcd7-201 gcn2∆ harboring either pEG(KG) or pEG(KG)/EMC4 were incubated in SC-medium (5 ml) supplemented with 2% raffinose (w/v) at 30 °C for 18 h. Ten milliliters of SC medium supplemented with 2% raffinose (w/v) was inoculated with 1% of overnight grown primary culture followed by incubation at 30 °C. At an absorbance of A 600 of ~ 0.5, an aliquot was collected as the uninduced control, and the remaining culture was induced by 2% galactose (w/v). Both induced and uninduced cultures were incubated for an additional 3 h at 30 °C.

After incubation, cells were harvested by centrifugation (6000 rpm for 10 min). Protein extraction of both induced and uninduced culture was carried using 20% tri-chloroacetic acid (TCA), and 20 μg of extracted proteins were resolved on SDS–PAGE followed by the transfer to the nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Immobilon P 0.45 μm) by electroblotting. The blot was incubated at 4 °C for 1 h in blocking solution containing 5% non-fat dried milk. After incubation, membrane was further incubated with anti-GST antibodies (1:5000, Abcam) overnight at 4 °C. Immunoreactive proteins were detected by using anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000, Abcam) for 1 h. Blots were washed by using PBST (phosphate buffer saline containing TritonX-100) buffer. Finally, the blots were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence kit (ECL, Bio-Rad, Inc. USA).

Expression of Emc4p in eIF2Bγ, eIF2Bδ, eIF2ε, and GCN2 mutant S. cerevisiae strains

Suppression analysis by Emc4p in other eIF2B mutants was done. eIF2Bγ (H70), eIF2Bδ (H750), eIF2Bε (H1792), and GCN2 (H591) mutants (Table S1) were transformed with pEG(KG) or pEG(KG)/Emc4. All the transformants were plated on SC-medium lacking uracil supplemented with 2% galactose, and the plates were incubated for 2 days at 30 °C. The transformants were selected and analyzed for Slg+ and Gcd+ phenotype by streaking and spot assay on SC-medium lacking uracil and containing 2% galactose or SC-medium lacking uracil and containing 2% galactose and 30 mM 3-AT respectively. Plates were incubated for 2 days at 30 °C. eIF2Bγ (H70) a Ts− mutant was also checked for suppression of temperature sensitive (Ts+) phenotype by Emc4p at 37 °C.

Effect of Emc4 protein overexpression on H2O2-, ethanol-, and caffeine-mediated cell death of eIF2B mutant and wild type S. cerevisiae strains

Three different sets of experiments (quantitative assay, spot assay, and halo assay) were performed. Wild-type GCD7 GCN2, GCD7 gcn2∆, and mutant gcd7-201 gcn2∆ strains of S. cerevisiae containing pEG(KG) or pEG(KG)/Emc4 were incubated for 16 h at 30 °C with shaking in the SC-medium supplemented with either 2% galactose or raffinose (lacking uracil). SC-medium also contained 4 mM H2O2 [30], 10% ethanol [31], 20 mM caffeine [32], 1.6% DMSO [23], 35 mM Dithiothreitol (DTT) [33], and 1 M NaCl [34] separately. After 16 h of growth, cell density was measured at A 600 nm using a UV visible spectrophotometer. Spot and halo assays were performed as given by [35, 36].

Ten-fold serially diluted cultures were spotted to check Slg and Gcd phenotypes on SC-medium supplemented with either 2% galactose or raffinose (lacking uracil). The medium was also supplemented 30 mM 3-AT for Gcd- phenotype, 4 mM H2O2, 10% ethanol, 20 mM caffeine, 1.6% DMSO, 35 mM Dithiothreitol (DTT), and 1 M NaCl. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2 days and observed for pattern of yeast cell growth.

For halo assay, filter disks containing 4 mM H2O2, 10% ethanol, 20 mM caffeine, 1.6% DMSO, 35 mM Dithiothreitol (DTT), and 1 M NaCl were placed on SC agar medium supplemented with either 2% galactose or raffinose (lacking uracil) with uniformly spread culture of S. cerevisiae mutant and wild-type strains containing pEG(KG) or pEG(KG)/Emc4. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2 days and observed for zone of inhibition. The S.cerevisiae strains GCD7 GCN2, GCD7 gcn2∆, and gcd7-201 gcn2∆ (Supplementary Table 1) were streaked on YPD plates with or without H2O2, ethanol, caffeine, DMSO, Dithiothreitol (DTT), and NaCl.

Results

Screening of genomic DNA library clones for rescuing slow growth phenotype of S. cerevisiae eIF2B mutant strains

Approximately, 30 transformants (gcd7-201 gcn2∆ transformants) were observed, showing colony size equivalent to that of isogenic wild-type GCD7 gcn2∆ transformed with vector alone were screened further for Gcd+ phenotype. Out of 30 transformants, only the transformant named as Sup-I restored the growth of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ as well as Gcd− phenotype. The growth of Sup-I clone was very similar to that of isogenic wild-type GCD7 gcn2∆ transformed with empty vector (Figure S1 a and b).

Plasmid DNA was rescued from Sup-I clone (Figure S1 c) and transformed into gcd7-201 gcn2∆ strain (Figure S1 d). The growth phenotypes (Slg+ and Gcd+) of transformants were checked further by streaking mutant transformants (gcd7-201 gcn2∆) along with isogenic wild-type strain (Figure S1 d). Results revealed that gcd7-201 gcn2∆ transformants were of uniform size and showed Slg+ and Gcd+ phenotype (S1 d and e). This data clearly suggests that a genomic clone (Sup-I) suppressed the Slg− and Gcd− phenotype of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant strain.

The Sup-I clone was sequenced using YEp24 specific primers (Table S7). The Sup-I genomic construct revealed the presence of only two complete ORFs including EMC4 ~ 573 bp and YGL230C ~ 444 bp genes encoding for chaperone and putative protein respectively, whereas TAN1 (YGL232W) and SAP4 genes were truncated. This data suggests that Sup-I harbors full length EMC4 that rescued slow growth and Gcd− phenotype of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure1

S. cerevisiae gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant strain confers Slg+ and Gcd+ phenotype when transformed with high copy (hc) pEG(KG)/EMC4 plasmid. GCD7 gcn2∆, gcd7-201 gcn2∆ harboring hc/EMC4, or empty hc vector pEG(KG) were streaked in parallel on SC medium lacking uracil, but either containing (a) raffinose or (b) galactose. Uracil-based plasmid hc/EMC4 was evicted on SC medium containing (c) FOA, and were further streaked on (d) SC-Ura medium. (e) Spotting of GCD7 gcn2∆, gcd7-201 gcn2∆ harboring hc/EMC4, or empty hc vector pEG(KG) was done on SC medium containing 2% galactose and lacking uracil or SC medium containing 2% galactose, 30 mM 3-AT, and lacking uracil. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. (f) Western analysis of GST-Emc4p expression in gcd7-201 gcn2∆ strain with anti-GST antibody. The whole cell protein extracts (20 μg) were prepared from uninduced and 2% galactose-induced cultures of the strain harboring hc/EMC4. Samples were then separated on 10% SDS gel followed by Western blotting using anti-GST for GST-Emc4 and anti-Gcd6 antibodies (Loading control). UI, uninduced; I, induced

Full size image

Sub-cloning of potential suppressor gene into yeast expression vector, pEG(KG)

EMC4 gene was amplified using gene-specific primers (Table S3) containing XbaI restriction site in the forward primer and SalI in the reverse primer followed by cloning in pEG(KG) vector at respective restriction sites. As expected, PCR product of ~ 0.55 kb was observed on agarose gel (Figure S2 b). EMC4 gene is present on chromosome VII of S. cerevisiae genome (http://www.yeastgenome.org/) (S2 a). pEG(KG) vector of 9.3 kb containing GST tag under GAL1 promoter was used for sub-cloning of EMC4 gene (Figure S2 c). EMC4 gene sequence was verified by sequencing, and error free and complete sequence of 573 bp was obtained.

GST-Emc4 expression rescued the Slg+ and Gcd+ phenotype of gcd7-201 gcn2∆

The gcd7-201 gcn2∆ was transformed with vector pEG(KG) alone or with GST-EMC4 expression construct, and the transformants were streaked on SC medium without uracil but supplemented with either raffinose (Fig. 1a) or galactose (Fig. 1b). As expected, gcd7-201 gcn2∆ transformed with vector alone or EMC4 construct showed slow growth phenotype on SC medium containing raffinose. Interestingly, GST-Emc4 rescued the growth of gcd7-201 gcn2∆, when streaked on SC medium containing galactose (Fig. 1b).

To further analyze the results, GST-EMC4, a uracil-based plasmid, was evicted on FOA-containing medium and showed original slow growth phenotype gcd7-201 gcn2∆ (Fig. 1c) but cannot grow on SC medium without uracil supplementation (Fig. 1d). This data clearly suggests that overexpression of Emc4 rescued the Slg+ of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant.

Further, GST-Emc4 was analyzed for rescuing Gcd+ phenotype of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant strain (Fig. 1e). As expected, gcd7-201 gcn2∆ transformed with vector alone showed slow growth phenotype in SC medium without uracil supplementation as well as Gcd− phenotype on medium containing 3-AT. Gcd+ phenotype of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ was also rescued when GST-Emc4 was expressed. The suppression of Slg− and Gcd− phenotype by overexpression of GST-Emc4 suggests that Emc4 is involved directly or indirectly in eIF2B-mediated translation regulation.

The expression of GST-Emc4 was verified by western blotting. Whole cell extracts (WCE) of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant expressing GST-Emc4 or GST alone were observed using anti-GST antibodies. Interestingly, a band of 26 kDa of GST protein was detected in extracts expressing GST alone, while a band of ~ 47 kDa protein was detected in WCE of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant transformed with GST-Emc4 construct. α-GCD6 antibodies were used as internal loading control (Fig. 1f).

Strain specific suppression of eIF2B mutations by Emc4p

Originally, Emc4p was isolated as suppressor of gcd7-201 mutation of eIF2Bβ. The effect of overexpression of Emc4p on other eIF2B mutations including, gcd6-1 gcn2∆, gcd1-502 gcn2-101, gcd12-503 gcn2-101, and GCN2 mutant gcn2::LEU2 (Table S2) was also tested. Interestingly, the Emc4p overexpression rescued temperature sensitive (Ts−) phenotype of gcd1-502 at 37 °C (Fig. 2a), but not that of other eIF2B mutants (data not shown). Emc4p overexpression also rescued Slg− and Gcd− phenotype of gcd1-502 gcn2-101 (Fig. 2b). These results suggested that Emc4p causes strain-specific suppression of eIF2B mutants.

Fig. 2
figure2

Effect of Emc4p expression on eIF2B mutants. gcd1-502 gcn2∆ mutant strain rescued Ts+, Slg+, and Gcd+ phenotype when transformed with hc/EMC4. (a) gcd1-502 gcn2∆ transformants showing Slg+ phenotype at 37 °C were streaked along with gcd1-502 gcn2∆ transformed with hc vector, pEG (KG). (b) Serial dilutions of the transformants showing Slg+ phenotype were spotted on SC-Ura and SC medium containing 30 mM-3AT. gcd1-502 gcn2∆ transformed with hc vector, pEG(KG), was spotted as a control. Plates were incubated for 2 days at 30 °C

Full size image

GST-Emc4 expression enhances stress tolerance in S. cerevisiae

GST-Emc4 overexpression protects wild type and mutant S. cerevisiae strains (gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2) against 4 mM H2O2, 10% ethanol, and 30 mM caffeine-mediated stress. gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2 streaked on YPD agar plates showed Slg− phenotype under H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress (Figure S3 a-c). The S. cerevisiae gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2 transformed with vector alone showed reduced growth (2-fold) under 4 mM H2O2, 10% ethanol, and 30 mM caffeine stress in presence of either raffinose or galactose. In contrast, gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2 transformed with pEG(KG)/EMC4 showed normal growth phenotype even under H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress in presence of 2% galactose (Figure S3 a-c ). Emc4p overexpression protects S. cerevisiae to H2O2-, ethanol-, and caffeine-induced cell death. In contrast, no significant protective effect was observed against DMSO, NaCl, and DTT (data not shown).

In spot assays, the S. cerevisiae cells gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2 overexpressing GST-Emc4 rescued the growth following exposure to H2O2, caffeine, and ethanol in presence of 2% galactose compared to control cells (Fig. 3a–c).

Fig. 3
figure3

Halo assay to test the effect of H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine on the growth of eIF2B mutants. Hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, and caffeine halo assays were performed with gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2. S. cerevisiae strains harboring either the empty hc vector, pEG (KG), or the hc/EMC4 gene expressing plasmid were spread on SC medium, containing filter disks soaked in (a) H2O2 (4 mM), (b) ethanol (10%), and (c) caffeine (30 mM) in the presence of either raffinose or galactose. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2–3 days

Full size image

The halo assay reveals that the zone of no growth surrounding the hydrogen peroxide, caffeine, and alcohol containing filter was significantly reduced in gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2 strains overexpressing GST-Emc4 in presence of 2% galactose as compared to control cells (Fig. 4a–c). This study strongly suggests that overexpression of Emc4p is capable of preventing cell death caused by high concentrations of H2O2, alcohol, and caffeine. Moreover, overexpression of Emc4p repairs gcd7-201 gcn2∆-based defect in translation initiation.

Fig. 4
figure4

Spot assay to test the effect of H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine on the growth of eIF2B mutants. Hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, and caffeine spot assays were performed with gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2. Ten-fold serially diluted transformants harboring empty hc, vector pEG (KG), or hc/EMC4 were spotted on SC-Ura or SC-Ura/3-AT agar plates supplemented with (a) H2O2 (4 mM), (b) ethanol (10%), and (c) caffeine (30 mM) in the presence of either raffinose or galactose. Cultures were incubated for 2 days at 30 °C

Full size image

Based upon the results, we proposed a schematic model (Figure S4) describing the effect of overexpression of Emc4p on eIF2B mutations. During amino acid starvation, H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress in S. cerevisiae (wild type), Gcn4p is derepressed. eIF2B mutations are known to derepress the Gcn4p independent of Gcn2p [53]. According to the present model, Emc4p (chaperone protein) overexpression might stabilize the unstable eIF2B complex by properly folding the misfolded subunits of eIF2B complex due to its chaperone activity, which results into stable eIF2-eIF2B interaction and initiates eIF2B GEF activity. This model also describes the role of Emc4p in stress response, where Emc4p overexpression mediates expression of stress response genes under amino acid starvation, H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress.

Discussion

Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) is involved in translation initiation/regulation in eukaryotes. Mutations in eIF2B genes lead to deregulation of translation initiation and regulation, causing vanishing white matter disease (VWM). The goal of this study was to identify the extragenic suppressors of S. cerevisiae eIF2B mutations corresponding to human eIF2B mutations and to study the role of suppressor protein in eIF2B-mediated regulatory pathways under different stress conditions. S. cerevisiae genomic DNA library was constructed and transformed into the eIF2B mutant strains for identification of extragenic suppressors of eIF2B mutations.

Emc4p was observed to suppress the growth defect of S. cerevisiae, caused by gcd7-201 gcn2∆ and gcd1-502 gcn2-101 mutations. gcd7-201 is a missense eIF2BβV341D mutation corresponding to human eIF2BβV316D causing improper folding of eIF2Bβ subunit, as a result eIF2Bδ is excluded from unstable eIF2BβV341D complexes, and eventually, rate of protein synthesis is also reduced [18]. Similar results have been reported in previous studies showing that β subunit Gcd7p provides a platform for interaction with Gcd2p helping proper eIF2B complex formation [14]. gcd1-502 is also a missense mutation of eIF2γ (L480Q). This mutation affects the γ subunit of eIF2B and lowers its GDP dissociation factor (GDF) activity and translation [13].

Endoplasmic reticulum membrane complex subunit 4 (EMC4) is a member of endoplasmic reticulum transmembrane complex (EMC complex) and is characterized as a chaperone protein (null mutants are known to induce the unfolded protein response) [5, 6]. This protein also plays an important role in biosynthesis of ionotropic acetylcholine receptors and its inactivation reduces the total number of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) present on plasma membrane of muscle and neuronal cells [33]. Thus, Emc4p is important for the development of muscle and neuronal cells. Slight change in the levels of Emc4p can cause brain-related disorders like vanishing white matter disease. But no relevance of Emc4p and VWM has been reported till now. Studies in mammalian systems have reported the high levels of EMC4 protein in the brain and specially during developmental stages of the organism (http://www.proteinatlas.org). Emc4p is also involved in stress response as described in a study which shows that overexpression of YGL230C inhibits the hydrogen peroxide-mediated oxidative stress and cell death in S. cerevisiae [30]. EMC4 is also involved in tethering of endoplasmic reticulum with mitochondria, important step for phospholipid metabolism. Lipids being important components of neuronal cells require more lipids, and defect in lipid metabolism in nerve cells can cause neurodegenerative disease [37]. These studies support our data that Emc4p is an important protein, regulating translation in some or other way in brain cells.

Emc4p is also involved in hydrogen peroxide-mediated oxidative stress response in S. cerevisiae [30]. Considering this fact, gcd7-201 gcn2∆, GCD7 gcn2∆, and GCD7 GCN2 strains of S. cerevisiae overexpressing Emc4p were also tested for resistance to other translation-inhibiting compounds (H2O2, ethanol, caffeine, DMSO, DTT, and NaCl). Surprisingly, Emc4p overexpression rescued both the Slg− and Gcd− phenotype of GCD7 GCN2, GCD7 gcn2∆, and gcd7-201 gcn2∆ S. cerevisiae strains under H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress but no effect was observed for DMSO-, DTT-, and NaCl-mediated stress conditions. Here we demonstrated that the overexpression of Emc4p suppressed the H2O2-, ethanol-, and caffeine-mediated growth inhibition of gcd7-201 gcn2∆ mutant and wild-type strains in Gcn2p independent manner possibly by modulating/targeting the eIF2B for translational regulation. According to the present study, H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine might be used as chemical modulators to study eIF2B-mediated pathways leading to stress responses as described previously [16]. Earlier study has proposed that Tan1p overexpression confers resistance to GCD7 GCN2, gcd7-201 gcn2∆, and GCD7 gcn2∆ growth defect under ethanol, H2O2, and caffeine stress [38].

Our studies are consistent with the previous reports of Gcn2 independent Gcn4 induction and translation regulation. For illustration, role of butanol mediated induction of GCN4 by a Gcn2p-independent manner has already been reported [39]. Oxidative stress (H2O2) causes translation inhibition by Gcn2 or eIF2α phosphorylation independent manner [40]. The molecular mechanisms of these processes are not fully understood.

Although, the mechanism by which Emc4p functions in translation regulation is still unknown, this study provides strong evidence that Emc4p protein in some or other way (possibly by stabilizing the eIF2-eIF2B interaction) is involved in the eIF2B-mediated translation initiation and regulation pathway. More importantly, the role of Emc4p in the brain describes and supports our study and could provide a tool for understanding the mechanism behind vanishing white matter disease.

Conclusions

In this work, we identified Emc4p as an extragenic suppressor of eIF2B mutations (gcd7-201 gcn2∆ and gcd-502 gcn2∆). Our results revealed that Emc4p suppresses the slow growth and general control derepression phenotypes of S. cerevisiae eIF2B mutations, corresponding to human eIF2B mutations. Emc4p does this by its chaperone activity in which it properly folds and stabilizes the mutant subunits (gcd7-201 and gcd1-502). This indicates that interaction of these two subunits is important for eIF2B activity. In addition, Emc4p also suppresses the S. cerevisiae growth defect under H2O2, ethanol, and caffeine stress which clearly indicates the role of Emc4p in eIF2B-mediated translation initiation and regulation most importantly in the brain. Our results help in understanding the mechanism behind VWM disease as our results are supported by previous studies in which the different roles of Emc4p in the brain and in stress response are clearly described.

Availability of data and materials

Data provided as supplementary.

Abbreviations

VWM:

vanishing white matter

eIF2B:

Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B

EMC4:

ER membrane protein complex subunit 4

Slg:

slow growth

Gcd:

general control derepression

3-AT:

3-Amino triazole

SC:

synthetic complete medium

Cfu:

Colony forming units

References

  1. 1.

    Wortham NC, Proud CG (2015) Biochemical effects of mutations in the gene encoding the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2B associated with vanishing white matter disease. BMC Med Genet 16:64 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-015-0204-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pavitt GD, Ramaiah KV, Kimball SR, Hinnebusch AG (1998) eIF2 independently binds two distinct eIF2B subcomplexes that catalyze and regulate guanine–nucleotide exchange. Genes Dev 12:514–526 https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.4.514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Krishnamoorthy T, Pavitt GD, Zhang F, Dever TE, Hinnebusch AG (2001) Tight binding of the phosphorylated α subunit of initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) to the regulatory subunits of guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B is required for inhibition of translation initiation. Mol Cell Biol 21:5018–5030 https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.21.15.5018-5030.2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rowlands AG, Panniers R, Henshaw EC (1988) The catalytic mechanism of guanine nucleotide exchange factor action and competitive inhibition by phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2. J Biol Chem 263:5526–5533

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Harding HP, Novoa I, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Wek R, Schapira M, Ron D (2000) Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 6: 1099-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00108-8.

  6. 6.

    Hinnebusch AG (1997) Translational regulation of yeast GCN4. A window on factors that control initiator-tRNA binding to the ribosome. J Biol Chem 272:21661–21664 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.35.21661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Natarajan K, Meyer MR, Jackson BM, Slade D, Roberts C, Hinnebusch AG, Marton MJ (2001) Transcriptional profiling shows that Gcn4p is a master regulator of gene expression during amino acid starvation in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21:4347–4368 https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.21.13.4347-4368.2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fogli A, Rodriguez D, Eymard-Pierre E, Bouhour F, Labauge P, Meaney BF, Zeesman S, Kaneski CR, Schiffmann R, Boespflug-Tanguy O (2003) Ovarian failure related to eukaryotic initiation factor 2B mutations. Am J Hum Genet 72:1544–1550 https://doi.org/10.1086/375404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schiffmann R, Elroy-Stein O (2006) Childhood ataxia with CNS hypomyelination/vanishing white matter disease-a common leukodystrophy caused by abnormal control of protein synthesis. Mol Genet Metab 88:7–15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2005.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pronk JC, Van Kollenburg B, Scheper GC, Van Der Knaap MS (2006) Vanishing white matter disease: a review with focus on its genetics. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 12(2):123–128 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Horzinski L, Huyghe A, Cardoso MC, Gonthier C, Ouchchane L, Schiffmann R, Blanc P, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Fogli A (2009) Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) GEF activity as a diagnostic tool for EIF2B-related disorders. PLoS One 4(12):e8318 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hannig EM, Williams NP, Wek RC, Hinnebusch AG (1990) The translational activator GCN3 functions downstream from GCN1 and GCN2 in the regulatory pathway that couples GCN4 expression to amino acid availability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 126:549–562

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dever TE, Chen JJ, Barber GN, Cigan AM, Feng L, Donahue TF, London IM, Katze MG, Hinnebusch AG (1993) Mammalian eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha kinases functionally substitute for GCN2 protein kinase in the GCN4 translational control mechanism of yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90:4616–4620 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.10.4616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vazquez de Aldana CR, Hinnebusch AG (1994) Mutations in the GCD7 subunit of yeast guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF-2B overcome the inhibitory effects of phosphorylated eIF-2 on translation initiation. Mol Cell Biol 14:3208–3222 https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.5.3208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pavitt GD, Yang W, Hinnebusch AG (1997) Homologous segments in three subunits of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B mediate translational regulation by phosphorylation of eIF2. Mol Cell Biol 17:1298–1313 https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.17.3.1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fogli A, Boespflug-Tanguy O (2006) The large spectrum of eIF2B-related diseases. Biochem Soc Trans 34(1):22–29 https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0340022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Leegwater PA, Vermeulen G, Könst AA, Naid S, Mulders J, Visser A, Kersbergen P, Mobach D, Fonds D, van Berkel CG, Lemmers RJ (2001) Subunits of the translation initiation factor eIF2B are mutant in leukoencephalopathy with vanishing white matter. Nat Genet 29:383–388 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Richardson JP, Mohammad SS, Pavitt GD (2004) Mutations causing childhood ataxia with central nervous system hypomyelination reduce eukaryotic initiation factor 2B complex formation and activity. Mol Cell Biol 24:2352–2363 https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.24.6.2352-2363.2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    van der Knaap MS, Leegwater PA, Könst AA, Visser A, Naidu S, Oudejan C, Schutgens RB, Pronk JC (2002) Mutations in each of the five subunits of translation initiation factor eIF2B can cause leukoencephalopathy with vanishing white matter. Ann Neurol 51:264–270 https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dev K, Santangelo TJ, Rothenburg S, Neculai D, Dey M, Sicheri F, Dever TE, Reeve JN, Hinnebusch AG (2009) Archaeal aIF2B interacts with eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF2α and eIF2Bα: implications for aIF2B function and eIF2B regulation. J Mol Biol 392:701–722 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dev K, Qiu H, Dong J, Zhang F, Barthlme D, Hinnebusch AG (2010) The beta/Gcd7 subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B (eIF2B), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, is crucial for binding eIF2 in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 30:5218–5233 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00265-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Moon SL, Parker R (2018) EIF2B2 mutations in vanishing white matter disease hypersuppress translation and delay recovery during the integrated stress response. RNA. 24(6):841-852 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.066563.118.

  23. 23.

    Motlekar N, de Almeida RA, Pavitt GD, Diamond SL, Napper AD (2009) Discovery of chemical modulators of a conserved translational control pathway by parallel screening in yeast. Assay and drug development technologies 7:479–494 https://doi.org/10.1089/adt.2009.0198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sambrook J, Fritsch E.F, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., Vols. 1, 2 and 3.

  25. 25.

    Elble R (1992) A simple and eficient procedure for transformation of yeasts. BioTechniques 13(1):18–20

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rose MD, Novick P, Thomas JH, Botstein D, Fink GR (1987) A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector. Gene 60 (2-3):237-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(87)90232-0.

  27. 27.

    Gunde T, Barberis A (2005) Yeast growth selection system for detecting activity and inhibition of dimerization-dependent receptor tyrosine kinase. BioTechniques. 39(4):541–549. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hoffman CS, Winston F (1987) A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformaion of Escherichia coli. Gene 57 (2–3): 67-272 . https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4.

  29. 29.

    DJ DJSG, Zhang B, Kraemer B, Pochart P, Fields S, Wickens M (1996) A three-hybrid system to detect RNA-protein interactions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(16):8496–8501 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.16.8496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ring G, Khoury CM, Solar AJ, Yang Z, Mandato CA, Greenwood MT (2008) Transmembrane protein 85 from both human (TMEM85) and yeast (YGL231c) inhibit hydrogen peroxide mediated cell death in yeast. FEBS Lett 582:2637–2642 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.06.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yamauchi Y, Izawa S (2016) Prioritized expression of BTN2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under pronounced translation repression induced by severe ethanol stress. Front Microbiol 7:1319 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wanke V, Cameroni E, Uotila A, Piccolis M, Urban J, Loewith R, De Virgilio C (2008) Caffeine extends yeast lifespan by targeting TORC1. Mol Microbiol 69(1):277–285 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06292.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Richard M, Boulin T, Robert VJ, Richmond JE, Bessereau JL (2013) Biosynthesis of ionotropic acetylcholine receptors requires the evolutionarily conserved ER membrane complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(11):E1055–E1063 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216154110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Melamed D, Pnueli L, Arava Y (2008) Yeast translational response to high salinity: global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels. RNA 14:1337–1351 https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.864908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Flower TR, Chesnokova LS, Froelich CA, Dixon C, Witt SN (2005) Heat shock prevents alpha-synuclein-induced apoptosis in a yeast model of Parkinson’s disease. J Mol Biol 351:1081–1100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yang Z, Khoury C, Jean-Baptiste G, Greenwood MT (2006) Identification of mouse sphingomyelin synthase 1 as a suppressor of Bax-mediated cell death in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 6:751–762 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00052.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lahiri S, Chao JT, Tavassoli S, Wong AKO, Choudhary V, Young BP, Loewen CJR, Prinz WA (2014) A conserved endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC) facilitates phospholipid transfer from the ER to mitochondria. PLoS Biol 12(10):e1001969 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sharma S, Sourirajan A, Dev K (2017) Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TAN1 (tRNA acetyltransferase) in eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) mediated translation control and stress response. 3 Biotech.7(3), 223.

  39. 39.

    Ashe MP, Slaven JW, Susan K, Ibrahimo S, Sachs AB (2001) A novel eIF2B-dependent mechanism of translational control in yeast as a response to fusel alcohols. EMBO J 20:6464–6474 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.22.6464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Knutsen JHJ, Rødland GE, Bøe CA, Håland TW, Sunnerhagen P, Grallert B, Boye E (2015) Stress-induced inhibition of translation independently of eIF2α phosphorylation. J Cell Sci 128:4420–4427 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.176545

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Dr. Alan G. Hinnebusch, NICHD, USA, for providing yeast strains, α-GCD6 antibodies, and plasmids used in this study. Authors are also thankful to Shoolini University, Bajhol, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India, for providing financial and infrastructural support for this study and all the members of Yeast Biology Lab for moral support.

Funding

No funding was received for this study. Shoolini University, Solan, HP, India, provided infrastructural and consumables support for the study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173212, India

    Sonum Sharma, Anuradha Sourirajan & Kamal Dev

  2. Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, USA

    David J. Baumler

  3. Microbial and Plant Genomic Institute, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, USA

    David J. Baumler

  4. Biotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, USA

    David J. Baumler

Authors
  1. Sonum Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anuradha Sourirajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David J. Baumler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kamal Dev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SS performed all the experiments; KD and AS conceived the study and participated in the design of experiments. SS, AS, and KD wrote the manuscript, and DJB edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal Dev.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S., Sourirajan, A., Baumler, D.J. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae ER membrane protein complex subunit 4 (EMC4) plays a crucial role in eIF2B-mediated translation regulation and survival under stress conditions. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 18, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00029-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • S. cerevisiae
  • eIF2B
  • VWM
  • Suppression
  • Identification
  • Emc4p
  • General Control Derepressed (GCD)
  • General Control Nonderepressible (GCN)