Skip to main content

Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and GC/MS-based phytochemical analysis of two traditional Lichen species Trypethellium virens and Phaeographis dendritica



Lichens are complex plants living in symbiotic relationship between fungi and algae. They are used for human and animal nutrition and are used in folk medicine in many countries over a considerable period of time. In the present study, various solvent extracts of Trypethelslium virens and Phaeographis dendritica were tested for their antioxidant and antimicrobial activity.


The phytochemical analysis by GC/MS revealed phenolics (1.273%), terpene (0.963%), hydrocarbons (2.081%), benzofurans (2.081%), quinone (1.273%), alkanes (0.963%), and aliphatic aldehydes (0.963%) as the predominant compounds in Trypethellium virens SPTV02, whereas secondary alcohol (1.184%), alkaloids (1.184%), and fatty acids (4.466) were the major constituents in Phaeographis dendritica. The antioxidant property of methanolic extract of T. virens and P. dendritica revealed the presence of total phenolic and terpenoids. The methanolic extracts of both the lichens exhibited encouraging DPPH antiradical activity, with the IC50 of 62.4 ± 0.76 µg/ml for T. virens and 68.48 ± 0.45 µg/ml for P. dendritica. Similarly, ferric reducing power assay result exhibited higher reducing activity. Further, the lichen extracts (methanolic) indicated promising antimicrobial activities against pathogens showing MIC from 62.5 to 500 µg/ml.


The study results concludes that both the lichens could be used as new natural source of antioxidants and antimicrobial agents which can be exploited for pharmaceutical applications.


Lichens are unique symbiotic cryptogamic flora alliances between a mycobiont, a photobiont, and/or a cyanobiont, which resemble non-flowering plants. Besides this, bacteria can repopulate lichens and form a third partner [1]. There is a wide diversity of lichen species globally that can sustain themselves in a broad array of extreme environmental conditions because of their unique impedance capacity, making them pioneer lifeforms. The intrinsic resistance of lichen is primarily due to the formation of a diverse spectrum of secondary metabolites. Lichens have about 1050 different chemical substances including aliphatic acids, depsides and depsidones, diterpenes, dibenzofurans, naphoquinones, anthraquinones, pulvinic acids, usnic acids, and xanthones [2]. These lichen metabolites are well-known for their therapeutic potential since ancient times and employed in traditional therapies for treating external burns, wounds, asthma, colds, tuberculosis, gastritis, and other ailments in humans and animals. Lichen metabolites have been characterized for their numerous biological features such as fungicidal, cytotoxic, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant [3]. These effects have been recognized and since ancient times. Recently, much attention has focused on lichens as useful sources of natural antioxidants and antimicrobial agents [4]. The synthetic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), previously widely used, are now found toxic. Therefore, many researchers have focused on natural antioxidants. However, antioxidant activities of lichens and their secondary metabolites are poorly known, and only few recent works provide some useful information about this subject. The biological aspect of lichen metabolites is not yet fully confirmed, although they do often have a defensive function [5] but few studies on the bioactivities of lichens have been conducted. Consequently, exploration in this area should be extended, with further efforts focused on evaluating the in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of lichen extracts. Thus, the study is carried out to detect the secondary metabolites of Trypethellium virens and Phaeographis dendritica and to determine the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and phytochemical constituents of different solvent extracts of these lichens, which are distributed predominantly on the territory of MSCB University with an intention to isolate some novel compounds for pharmaceutical applications. Thus, the studied lichen species (Trypethellium virens and Phaeographis dendritica) have been characterized which revealed the presence of phenolics, terpenes, hydrocarbons, benzofurans, quinone, alkanes, aliphatic aldehydes, secondary alcohol, alkaloids, and fatty acids. In the presence of those bioactive metabolites, both the lichens demonstrated antioxidant activity by scavenging DPPH radicals and reducing ferric ions and significant antibacterial and antifungal potency against human and plant pathogens.


Study site

Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University (MSCBU) located in 21.9303° N 86.7636° E in Mayurbhanj district of Odisha State, India, closure to the Similipal Biosphere Reserve with dry deciduous vegetation types and typical eco-friendly area with significant floras. Frequent field visits were performed, and field documentation was carried out using a random sampling technique. Only distinctive samples were put together from the host and wrapped in white paper bags, packed in polythene bags, and brought to the research laboratory. The altitude was noted with a hand-held GPS (Garmin Etrex 10 × GPS), the temperature and humidity were measured by a hygrometer (HTC) seasonally, and microhabitat data was recorded for each transect (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study area: Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University

Identification of lichens

Thirteen number of lichens samples growing on tree barks were collected, separated, and identified based on their morphology using lichen identification manual [6]. Based on the predominant and diversity indexes, several lichen species were explored on campus and deposited at Department of Biotechnology (MSCB University) from which Trypethellium virens (Lücking, Nelsen, & Aptroot 2016) and Phaeographis dendritica (Ach., Müll. Arg. 1882) (Fig. 2A, B) were used for experimental purpose due to their dominance in the territory.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Microscopic photograph of Lichen species A Phaeographis dendritica and B Trypethelium virens

DNA isolation from lichens

Lichen thallus (10 mg) was taken in a micro-vial and added three or four 2.5-mm sterile glass beads to the sample and placed in liquid nitrogen; disrupted the sample with a Mini-Beadbeater-24 for 30 s. The sample was shaken vigorously approximately 20 times vertically with KCl extraction buffer (300 µL), added chloroform (300 µL), and kept inverted. The sample was centrifuged (12,000 g) for 1 min at room temperature. The upper liquid layer was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and added 180 µL of chilled isopropanol up to 60% total volume. Gently combined, centrifuged (12,000 g) for 1 min at room temperature, then discarded the supernatant. The resulting pellet was washed with 300 µL chilled ethanol (70%). The pellet was dried at 55o C in oven for 5 min. and 100 µL of TE buffer was added. The purified DNA may be stored at 4 °C [7].

PCR and sequencing

For the sequences generated by our research group, partial genomic DNA was isolated from mycelium (upper cortex region). Amplification of ribosomal DNA (rDNA), including the intervening internal transcribed spacer regions, 5.8S rDNA (ITS1–5.8S–ITS2), and 28 s larger sub-unit rDNA (PLN1-28 s-PLN2) was performed using the forward primers ITS1 5′-AAGTCGTAACAAGGTCTCCGTA-3′ (GC 45.5%, Tm 55.3ºC, ΔG − 39.3 kcal/mol) and the reverse primer ITS2 5′-TTAAGTTCAGCGGGTATTCCTA-3′ (GC 40.9%, Tm 53.2ºC, ΔG − 40.68 kcal/mol) for P. dendritica strain SPB041 and PLN1 as forward primer 5′-TATACAATAAGCGGACCTTTTT-3′ (GC 31.8% Tm 49.8ºC ΔG − 39.8 kcal/mol) and reverse primer 5′ AAAAATGGCCCACTAGTAACGC-3′ (GC 45.5% Tm 58.2ºC ΔG − 43.35 kcal/mol) for T. virens SPTV02 following the protocol of [8]. PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel (120 V for 25 min) to validate the presence and size of amplicons, followed by purification via Exonuclease I and recombinant Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase, and sequenced bidirectionally on a Capillary Electrophoresis Genetic Analyzer (ABI 3730). Forward and reverse proofreads were edited and assembled in MEGA and Sequencher v. 5 then deposited in GenBank (OP819895 and OP879718). PCR products for ITS generally range in size from 400 to 1200 nucleotides for most lichen-forming fungi that are examined.

Preparation of the lichen extracts

Lichen samples are dried and made into powder form, from which 10 g was extracted on Soxhlet apparatus (Barosil) at 45 °C for 24 h using organic solvents (methanol, acetone, benzene, diethyl ether). After 6 to 8 heat cyclic extraction, the solvent was evaporated using a hot air oven at 42–45 °C to obtain dry extract up to 2 g each.

DPPH radical scavenging

The radical scavenging activity of two test lichens was evaluated by DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazil) assay [9]. DPPH solution of 1 ml (0.1 mM) was added to 3 ml of different concentration (100–500 μg/ml) of lichen extract, and the mixture was kept for 30 min (incubation) at room temperature and the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm using UV–visible spectrophotometer (Systronics-119). The DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated by the equation: activity (%) = [(control Abs (A0) – sample Abs (A1))/control Abs (A0)] × 100, where A0 is the absorbance of the negative control (2 ml of methanol solution of DPPH radical + 1 ml of 5% DMSO) and A1 is the absorbance of reaction mixture or standards, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were used as standards. Ascorbic acid was used as positive control.

Ferric-reducing activity

The ferric-reducing antioxidant power of the studied lichen species was calculated using the method of [10]. Different concentrations of two lichen extracts (100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 μg/ml) were mixed with 2.5 ml of PO4 buffer (pH 6.6, 0.2 M) and potassium ferricyanide (1%) and upheld at 50 °C for 25 min. It was then blended with 10% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged (3000 rpm) for 20 min. Afterwards, the resultant supernatant was meticulously mixed with 2.5 ml of distilled water and 0.5 ml of FeCl3 (0.1%), and absorbance measured at 700 nm. The assay used butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) as a positive control.

Determination of total phenolic contents (TPC)

The total phenolic content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [11]. Lichen extract (100 μl) was treated with 2 ml of sodium carbonate (2%). After a 10-min gap, 500 μl of Folin’s reagent was added, and the reaction mixture was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 20 min and the absorbance was taken at 650 nm (Spectrometer- Systronics-119). The finding was plotted as GAE/g dry extract.

Estimation of total flavonoid content (TFC)

The total flavonoid content was determined according to the method of [12]. One milliliter of the lichen extract was mixed with 500 μl of sodium nitrite and aluminium chloride (10%, 300 μl). After 10 min, 1 ml of sodium hydroxide (1 M) was mixed and the volume was made up to 5 ml with distilled water and the mixture was incubated for 30 min and the absorbance was recited at 510 nm. The result was expressed as quercetin equivalent, i.e., μg QE/g dry extract.

Estimation of total Tannin

The total tannin was determined by modified method of [10]. The standard (tannic acid) solution of five different concentrations (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 µg/mL) and the lichen extract of 200 µg/mL of 0.1 mL/100 µl were taken in different test tubes. Then, 7 mL of distilled water, 0.5 mL of Folin Phenol reagent, and 1 mL of 35% sodium carbonate solution were added, and the final volume was adjusted up to 10 mL with distilled water. The mixture was shaken well, kept at room temperature for 30 min, and absorbance was taken at 725 nm on UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Jenway-119). The total tannin content of the extract was expressed as tannic acid equivalent (TAE).

Estimation of total terpenoid

Quantitative estimation of the terpenoid content was carried out following the method of [13]. Lichen extract 1 ml (1:1 mg/ml) was mixed with chloroform (1 ml) and conc. H2SO4 (1 ml), carefully shaken, and the absorbance was taken at 538 nm. The standard curve was plotted using Linalool equivalent (mg LE/g DW) per gram dry weight of the sample taking Linalool as the standard for reference.

Antimicrobial assays of lichens

Pathogens used for antimicrobial activity

Antimicrobial activity performed by using eight pathogenic microbes (four human pathogenic bacteria and fungi) is collected as microbial type culture collection (MTCC), these are Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC-96), Escherichia coli (MTCC-443), Vibrio cholerae (MTCC-3906), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC-441), Aspergillus niger (MTCC-1344), Candida albicans (MTCC-183), Botrytis cinerea (MTCC-2104), and Penicillium verrucosum (MTCC-1558).

Antibacterial activity by agar well diffusion method

The anti-bacterial activity was assayed on Mueller–Hinton agar medium (MHA) by agar well diffusion [14]. Twenty milliliters of sterilized MHA was poured into sterile petri plates, and after solidification, 20 μl of pathogens (106 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml) were swabbed on the corresponding plates. In the inoculated plates, 6-mm diameter agar wells were bored using a sterile cork borer and 50 μl of lichen extract was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 1 μg/μl concentration and were loaded into the respective wells and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After the period of incubation, the inhibition zone formed around the wells was measured and expressed in millimeter (mm) and ampicillin (0.1 μg/μl) was used as positive control and experiments were performed in triplicate.

Antifungal activity by agar well diffusion method

The antifungal activity was also assayed by agar well diffusion [14] on potato dextrose agar medium (PDA). The 20 ml of sterilized PDA was poured into sterile petriplates; after solidifying, 20 μl of test fungus (106 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml) were consistently swabbed on the media plates. Agar wells of 6-mm diameter were bored using a sterile cork borer in the inoculated plates, and 50 μl of lichen extracts dissolved in DMSO (1 μg/μl) concentration were loaded into the wells and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for 48–72 h (depends upon bacterial generation period and bacterial strain). After the incubation, the inhibitory zone shaped around the wells was measured and expressed in millimetres (mm). Clotrimazole (0.1 μg/μl) was used as a positive control, and experiments were conducted in triplicates.

Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)

This antimicrobial assay was carried out by using standard 96-well plates with Mueller Hinton broth media (MHB) for bacteria and potato dextrose broth media (PDB) for fungus to determine MIC. Lichen extracts at systematic concentrations (1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, and 15.62 µg/mL) were prepared using two-fold serial dilution with MHB and a pathogen as controls. About 50 μg of the test bacterial and fungal inoculums were added at a concentration of 106 CFU/mL [15]. The biofilms were analyzed after 24 h (for bacteria) and 48 h (for fungus) with a microplate reader (Biorad, iMark-11457), respectively. The value of minimal inhibition (MIC) was considered as the lowest concentration of the extract in the broth media that visible growth parameters indicate the inhibition of microbes [16].

Gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis (GC–MS)

For GC–MS analysis, an extract preparation is performed using Soxhlet apparatus with methanol as solvent because methanol indicated better results as compared to other solvents (acetone, benzene, and diethyl ether). Liquid extract was collected, filtered by using Whatman’s No. 1 filter paper, afterwards dried at 45 °C for 48 h in a hot air oven, and collected as a dry extract for the characterization of biomolecules. GC–MS analyses were performed on an Elite-wax Capillary-column chromatography (60.0 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm). The autosampler was used to inject 1.5 μl of the sample with a 10:1 split ratio. Initial temperature 60 °C for 1 min. Temperature programming to 200 °C, holding for 3 min further programmed to 10–300 °C, held for 10 min. Temperature regulation of the injection port was up to 280 °C, helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Solvent delay for 7 min has a transferred temperature of 160 °C, and the source temperature was 150 °C. The percentage of the extract composition was computed from the GC peak areas. A qualitative analysis that allowed for the detection was performed using PubChem, ChemSpider, Spectra Base, and the NIST standard spectral library.

Statistical analysis

A one-way analysis of variance has been used for statistically significant correlation, followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. The P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.



Lichens were put together from the plant bark (Fig. 3A, B), the altitude was noted with a hand-held Garmin Etrex 10 × GPS, the relative temperature was 30 to 42 °C, and the humidity was 42 to 55% seasonally. The morphological identification was carried out and described (Tables 1 and 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Field photography of Lichens in natural habitat A Phaeographis dendritica and B Trypethellium virens

Table 1 Morphological identification of Lichens
Table 2 Morphological characteristics of lichens

Molecular identification of Lichens

BLAST results and data validation

A comparison of nucleotide sequences was performed using the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database ( The base pair alignment of 28S rRNA was performed using Cluster W of MEGA 11 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis) software [17], and the aligned sequences were downloaded from the GenBank data base. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method [18] Saitou and Nei (1987) through MEGA 11 software and tested. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 600 replicates is taken to signify the evolutionary history of the taxa (for both species). This analysis involved 12 nucleotide (P. dendritica) and 16 nucleotide (T. virens) sequences (Fig. 4). All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There was a total of 541 positions (T. virens) and 1238 positions (P. dendritica) in the final dataset (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Phylogenetic relationship of P. dendritica across neighbor-joining method

Fig. 5
figure 5

Phylogenetic relationship of T. virens across neighbor-joining method

Antioxidant activities of lichens

DPPH scavenging activity

The DPPH radical scavenging activity was evaluated in T. virens (Fig. 6) and P. dendritica (Fig. 7) across acetone, methanol, benzene, and diethyl ether extract, which flashed different scavenging capabilities. Among other solvents, methanolic extract had maximum radical scavenging activity, having an IC50 (half minimal concentration) of T. virens (62.4 ± 0.76 µg/ml) and P. dendritica (68.48 ± 0.45 µg/ml), both species have strong radical scavenging potential, but T. virens with a minimal IC 50 value deployed relatively higher DPPH antiradical property.

Fig. 6
figure 6

DPPH radical scavenging activity of T. virens in various solvent extractions

Fig. 7
figure 7

DPPH radical scavenging activity of P. dendritica in various solvent extractions

Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP)

The ferric ion reduction activity of tested lichen species (T. virens and P. dendritica) was prated in (Figs. 8 and 9), methalonic extracts of both species displayed higher reducing activities (T. virens (0.344 ± 0.011 nm) and P. dendritica (0.193 ± 0.003 nm)), and benzene extracts had comparably lowermost activities (T. virens (0.192 ± 0.012 nm) and P. dendritica (0.129 ± 0.03 nm)), while acetone and diethyl ether pursuit reasonably moderate reducing activity.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Ferric reducing activity of T. virens

Fig. 9
figure 9

Ferric reducing activity of P. dendritica

Total phenolic content (TPC)

Quantitative phenol estimation of both lichens has displayed as gallic acid calibration/equivalent (mg/g GAE of total dry extract). The higher amount of phenolics chronicled in the methalonic extract of both species, i.e., T. virens (0.63 ± 0.007 mg/g GAE) and P. dendritica (0.46 ± 0.0024 mg/g GAE). However, the extract of diethyl ether and benzene quantify moderate amount and acetone extract shows relatively lower amount of phenolics (Table 3).

Table 3 Quantitative phenolic estimation in T. virens and P. dendritica across organic extracts (acetone, methanol, diethyl ether, and benzene)

Total flavonoid content (TFC)

Estimation of total flavonoid depends on phenolics because flavonoids are classified under phenolics, but total flavonoid content was collaborated with Rutin equivalent (RE). In both tested species, methanol extraction propounded relatively better content of flavonoids in comparison to other solvents. But in a methalonic extract of T. virens, the maximum amount of flavonoid was recorded (0.064 ± 0.04 mg/g RE) (Table 4).

Table 4 Quantitative flavonoid estimation in T. virens and P. dendritica across (acetone, methanol, diethyl ether, and benzene)

Total tannin content

The tannins are the complex phenolics, while total tannin of the test samples was calculated using the standard calibration curve of tannic acid (y = 0.0002x + 0.2029, R2 = 0.9925). Methanol and acetone extract of T. virens and P. dendritica (Table 5) propounded relatively higher content of tannin in comparison to diethyl ether and benzene extract. However, methalonic extract of T. virens content relatively highest (0.44 ± 0.003 mg/g TAE) tannin content.

Table 5 Quantitative estimations of total tannin

Total terpenoid content

Total terpenoid, mentioned as isoprenoids, includes diterpenoids and triterpenoids, and the total terpenoid expressed is related to linalool equivalent (LE). Maximum terpenoid content is noted in methalonic extracts of lichens and least recorded in benzene extracts; however, methalonic extracts of T. virens have a higher content of terpenoid (0.252 ± 0.0012 mg/ml LE) and benzene extracts of P. dendritica (0.072 ± 0.003 mg/ml LE) exhibit a lower content of terpenoid content (Table 6).

Table 6 Quantitative estimations of total terpenoid

Antimicrobial activities of lichens

Zone of inhibition in agar well diffusion method

The result obtained from the antimicrobial activity lichen extracts against human pathogens (bacteria and fungus) by measuring the zone of inhibition. The zone of inhibition was depending upon solvents, concentration of the sample, and the tested pathogens. The notable antibacterial activity was viewed in methanol extract of T. virens (19 ± 0.2), and the zone of inhibition was also suggestively higher against gram-negative bacteria (S. aureus) (Fig. 10A–D). Among the organic solvents, the methalonic extract of P. dendritica (16 ± 0.1) showed better inhibition activity against C. albicans, subsequently benzene extract of T. virens (9 ± 0.2) showed relatively lower inhibition against B. subtilis. However, diethyl ether extract of T. virens shown moderate inhibition against S. aureus (15 ± 0.1) and E. coli (12 ± 0.2). Hereafter, diethyl ether extract of P. dendritica displayed relatively better inhibition against C. albicans (15 ± 0.2); however, diethyl ether extract of T. virens shows minimal inhibition against A. niger (10 ± 0.1) and P. verrucosum (10 ± 0.2) (Fig. 11A–D).

Fig. 10
figure 10

A Antibacterial activity of lichen against pathogenic bacteria. B Antibacterial activity of control (Ampicillin) against pathogenic bacteria. C Antibacterial activity of T. virens against pathogenic bacteria. D Antibacterial activity of P. dendritica against pathogenic bacteria

Fig. 11
figure 11

A Antifungal activity of lichen against pathogenic fungi. B Antifungal activity of control (Clotrimazole) against fungal pathogens. C Antifungal activity of different solvent extracts of T. virens. D Antifungal activity of different solvent extracts of P. dendritica

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)

The antimicrobial activity of both lichen species against the test pathogens was determined by the values of the MIC and shown in Table 7. Both selected lichens have antimicrobial potency against the pathogenic microbes. The MIC values were dependent on the solvents (which are used for extraction), their concentration, and the tested microbes. The range of MIC against the tested microorganisms was within the range of 62.5 to 500 µg/ml. P. dendritica liberated notable antimicrobial activity, and the MIC value was significantly lower against gram-negative bacteria than gram-positive bacteria. Among the fungal pathogens, C. albicans and P. verrucosum conferred significant MIC values.

Table 7 Antimicrobial activity (MIC) against pathogenic microbes across different solvent extraction

GC–MS analysis and compound characterization

GC–MS screening is carried out in methalonic extracts of lichens, which detect various primary and secondary viable metabolites (Figs. 12 and 13). Some metabolites are detected through gas chromatographic techniques, and some are detected through mass spectrometry. The GC–MS screening of T. virens displayed recorded amounts of metabolite types such as phenolics, terpene lactones, alcohol, hydrocarbons, benzofurans, fatty acids, fluorinated aliphatic substances, organofluorine compounds, pyrans, alkanes, fatty alcohols, terpins, and aliphatic aldehydes (Table 8). However, P. dendritica illustrated secondary alcohol, sugar alcohol, alkaloids, and large number of fatty acids (Table 9).

Fig. 12
figure 12

GC-MS chromatograms of methanol extract of T. virens

Fig. 13
figure 13

GC-MS chromatograms of methanol extract of P. dendritica

Table 8 Compound characterization through GC–MS analysis of T. virens
Table 9 Characterization of metabolite screening through GC–MS analysis in P. dendritica


The production and regulation of secondary metabolites in Lichenized fungi is complex with multivariant ecological stimulants [19] that may directly influence polyketide synthase transcription or may influence one another indirectly, initiating complex signal transduction cascades. This multifaceted system makes it difficult to separate the effects of environmental parameters, developmental stages, and other factors from one another. Stocker-Worgotter (2001) [20] proved that baeomysesic and squamatic acids were not produced by Thamnolia spp. until they were exposed to high light conditions at relatively low temperatures (15 °C). These conditions reflect the conditions in the natural habitat of Thamnolia spp. Larson, 1979 [21] reported that Thamnolia spp. typically grow in polar or alpine habitats exposed to cooler temperatures, high light conditions, and dehydrating winds, that affect water evaporation from thallus. These observations suggest that environmental parameters may trigger the production of certain compounds in some species and not the age of the Lichens. Numerous studies have shown a correlation between light levels and the production of usnic acid or other compounds within Lichen thalli [22]. The amount of atranorin in the cortex of Parmotrema hypotropum was shown to correlate positively with the amount of yearly light reaching the thallus. These studies concludes that chemical constituents within Lichen thallus varies more prominently because of habitat diversity, ecological conditions, and host specificity rather than age of the lichen.

The biopotential approach has proven to be more effective in the direct measurement of phenol compounds than extraction by means of methanol in two lichen species. Furthermore, the total phenolic content ranged from 0.63 ± 0.007 of GAE/g in a methanol extract of T. virens to (0.46 ± 0.0024 of GAE/g) in powdered material from P. dendritica. Therefore, the differences are dependent on the species, the nature of the extract, and the methods of extraction; for example, Chemat et al. (2011) [23] showed that the sonicate extraction method improves the extraction of phenolic compounds, and Aoussar et al. (2016) [24] noted that the different extraction methods have an influence on antioxidant activity. The quantification of phenolics and the measurement of antioxidant capacity uses the spectroscopic approach. This showed that the total content of phenols in powdered material was high in the species studied, and it should be noted that several studies have shown that the values obtained by the quenching process are higher than those obtained by solvent extraction [25]. The total phenolic content of methanol extracts of Flavoparmelia caperata was reported to be 63.50 μg GAE mg by Aoussar et al. (2016) [24] and 90.83 μg by Mitrovic et al. (2011) [26], but in our findings, the content was found to be 0.311 mg/g of GAE/g. Differences in the same lichen species may be due to deviations in geographic and climatic conditions arising from the various methods of extraction [24]. Our findings corroborate other studies indicating that lichens are a rich source of phenolic compounds. Kumar et al. (2014) [27] reported, for illustration, that all the lichen extracts they studied had a significant content of alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds. Several studies have been conducted to assess the phenolic compound and the biological properties, specifically the antioxidant activity of various lichen extracts [27, 28]. The findings of our study confirmed the abundance of phenolic compounds in lichens, which also have strong antioxidant activity in vitro against various oxidative systems such as DPPH, hydroxyl radical scavenging, and FRAP. Lichens have natural products with broad bioresource potential. Several studies have explored the biological activities of crude solvent extracts and purified compounds of lichen species in respect of their potential antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, cytotoxic, insecticidal, anti-inflammatory, enzyme inhibitory, and anticancer importance [29, 30]. In our experimental work, the tested lichen extracts, using methanol, showed strong antioxidant activities and confirm the results previously obtained by Mitrovic et al. (2011) [26], who investigated the methanol extracts of the lichens Parmelia sulcata, Flavoparmelia caperata, Evernia prunastri, Hypogymnia physodes, and Cladonia foliacea. Furthermore, antioxidant proprieties of other lichens demonstrated their high antioxidant effect; for instance, Kumar et al. 2014 [27] showed the antioxidant capacity of 14 different lichen species by measuring various oxidative systems in vitro.

The antimicrobial activity of the methanol extracts of the examined lichens varied depending on the lichen species, extract concentration, and tested organism [31]. In this study, the methanolic extracts of T. virens and P. dendritica had the strongest antimicrobial activity among other organic extract, inhibiting the majority of the bacteria and fungi tested. It is possible that the observed differences in antimicrobial activities are due to the presence of different antimicrobial components in the extracts of different lichen species. Acknowledging the chemical components of lichens is immensely helpful because it will support in the synthesis of potentially new chemical ingredients. In recent decades, there has been a causal relationship between the total content of these compounds and the biological activities recorded in a large number of lichens. The antimicrobial properties of phenols and polyphenols are explained by the presence of phenol hydroxyl groups, whose number is correlated with their toxicity towards microorganisms. The possible mechanisms of their action include inhibition of extracellular microbial enzymes, deprivation of the substrates required for microbial growth, or direct action on microbial metabolism through inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation by sulfhydryl groups and some nonspecific interactions [32, 33]. Likewise, the presence of terpenes is observed in numerous representatives of lichens [33, 34]. According to their lipophilic nature, terpenes are observed to act by disrupting membrane functions of microbial cells, and they also cause an increase in nonspecific cell membrane permeability for the antibiotic molecule. Lichesterol have also been reported to have antibacterial properties; the correlation between membrane lipids and sensitivity to steroidal compounds indicates the mechanism by which steroids specifically associate with membrane lipids and exert their action by causing leakages from liposomes [35]. Many researchers report such phytochemical screening of various lichens [36, 37]. In the present study, we have identified and chemically characterized two crustose lichens, T. virens and P. dendritica, for the first time. The extraction of these metabolites was carried out with hot methanol. Gas chromatography (GC) identifies secondary alcohol, fatty acids, sugar alcohols, phenolics, quinone, aromatic hydrocarbons, benzofurans, carbonyl compounds, volatile fatty acids, pyrans, carboxylic acid, alkanes, aliphatic aldehydes, and long-chain fatty alcohols, whereas mass spectrometry (MS) identifies some polyphenol groups. This study reveals for the first time the different compounds of T. virens and P. dendritica, considered rare international species; moreover, it points out the status of the lichens of India as an auspicious source of bioactive molecules.


The methanol, acetone, benzene, and diethyl ether extracts of two selected lichens (identified first time from MSCB University campus) displayed differential antioxidant and antimicrobial activity in vitro. Bioactive metabolites like terpene lactones, polyphenols, tannins, flavonoids, benzofurans, fluorinated aliphatic substances, organofluorine compounds, pyrans, alkanes, fatty alcohols, terpins, aliphatic aldehydes, secondary alcohols, sugar alcohols, alkaloids, and a large number of fatty acids were the major constituents of these lichens. The present investigation validates the use of lichen extracts as natural antimicrobial and antioxidant intermediaries. These lichen species can be a promising alternative to synthetic antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds and confirms that these lichens represent a significant source of phenolic compounds. Future research will concentrate on isolating different categories of phenolics and determining their biological properties in vitro and in vivo, which have a wide range of biological applications in promising drug therapies based on the lichens substances and can be of high significance in the food industry as they prevent oxidative processes, enhance quality, and nutritional value of food.

Availability of data and materials

The database generated and/or analyzed during in the current study is not publicly available due to privacy and confidentiality agreements as well as other restriction but is available from the corresponding author on responsible request.


  1. Parrot D, Legrave N, Delmail D, Grube M, Suzuki M, Tomasi S (2016) Review–Lichen-associated bacteria as a hot spot of chemodiversity: focus on uncialamycin, a promising compound for future medicinal applications. Planta Med 82:1143–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elix JA, Stocker-Wörgötter E, Nash TH (2008) Lichen biology. ed. Nash III TH. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 104–133

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Kosanić M, Ranković B (2019) Lichen secondary metabolites as potential antibiotic agents. Lichen secondary metabolites: bioactive properties and pharmaceutical potential 99-127.

  4. Güvenç A, Akkol EK, Süntar İ, Keleş H, Yıldız S, Çalış İ (2012) Biological activities of Pseudevernia furfuracea (L.) Zopf extracts and isolation of the active compounds. J Ethnopharmacol. 144(3):726–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shrestha G, St Clair LL (2013) Lichens: a promising source of antibiotic and anticancer drugs. Phytochem Rev 12(1):229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Awasthi DD (2000) Lichenology in Indian subcontinent: a supplement to A hand book of lichens. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Sin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Park SY, Jang SH, Oh SO, Kim JA, Hur JS (2014) An easy rapid and cost-effective method for DNA extraction from various lichen taxa and specimens suitable for analysis of fungal and algal strains. Mycobiology 42(4):311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc Guide Methods Appl 18(1):315–322

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kosanić M, Ranković B, Vukojević J (2011) Antioxidant properties of some lichen species. J Food Sci Technol 48(5):584–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oyaizu M (1986) Studies on products of browning reaction antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr Diet 44(6):307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taga MS, Miller EE, Pratt DE (1984) Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61(5):928–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W (1999) The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem 64(4):555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghorai N, Chakraborty S, Gucchait S, Saha SK, Biswas S (2012) Estimation of total Terpenoids concentration in plant tissues using a monoterpene. Linalool as standard reagent

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Steel KJ, Barrow GI, Feltham RK (1993) Cowan and Steel’s manual for the identification of medical bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, p 217

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmad I, Khan MS, Khan RA, Khan JM (2017) Rutin inhibits mono and multi-species biofilm formation by foodborne drug resistant Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Food Control 79:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Srinivasan D, Nathan S, Suresh T, Perumalsamy PL (2001) Antimicrobial activity of certain Indian medicinal plants used in folkloric medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 74(3):217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tamura K, Kumar S, Stecher G (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 33(7):1870–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4(4):406–425

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fox EM, Howlett BJ (2008) Secondary metabolism: regulation and role in fungal biology. Curr Opin Microbiol 11(6):481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stocker-Wörgötter E (2001) Experimental lichenology and microbiology of lichens: culture experiments, secondary chemistry of cultured mycobionts, resynthesis, and thallus morphogenesis. Bryologist 104(4):576–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larson DW (1979) Lichen water relations under drying conditions. New Phytol 82:713–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deduke C, Timsina B, Piercey-Normore MD (2012) Effect of environmental change on secondary metabolite production in lichen-forming fungi. International perspectives on global environmental change. InTech, 197–230.

  23. Chemat F, Khan MK (2011) Applications of ultrasound in food technology: processing preservation and extraction. Ultrason Sonochem 18(4):813–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aoussar N, Rhallabi RA, Mhand R, Manzali M, Bouksaim A, Douira S, Aydin K, Kinalioğlu (2016) Comparison of antioxidant activity of Roccella phycopsis Ach. (Roccellaceae) and Flavoparmelia caperata (L.) Hale (Parmeliaceae) lichens. Düzce Univ J Sci Technol 4:837–847

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kitrytė V, Šaduikis A, Venskutonis PR (2015) Assessment of antioxidant capacity of brewer’s spent grain and its supercritical carbon dioxide extract as sources of valuable dietary ingredients. J Food Eng 167:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitrović T, Stamenković S, Cvetković V, Tošić S, Stanković M, Radojević I, Marković S (2011) Antioxidant, antimicrobial and antiproliferative activities of five lichen species. Int J Mol Sci 12(8):5428–5448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar J, Dhar P, Tayade AB, Gupta D, Chaurasia OP, Upreti DK, Srivastava RB (2014) Antioxidant capacities, phenolic profile and cytotoxic effects of saxicolous lichens from trans-Himalayan cold desert of Ladakh. PLoS ONE 9(6):98696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kosanić M, Ranković B, Stanojković T, Rančić A, Manojlović N (2014) Cladonia lichens and their major metabolites as possible natural antioxidant, antimicrobial and anticancer agents. LWT-Food Sci Technol 59(1):518–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reddy RG, Veeraval L, Maitra S, Chollet-Krugler M, Tomasi S, Lohezic-Le Devehat F, Chakravarty S (2016) Lichen-derived compounds show potential for central nervous system therapeutics. Phytomedicine 23(12):1527–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Odabasoglu F, Aslan A, Cakir A, Suleyman H, Karagoz Y, Halici M, Bayir Y (2004) Comparison of antioxidant activity and phenolic content of three lichen species. Phytother Res 18(11):938–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cowan MM (1999) Plants products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:564–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ranković B, Kosanić M (2019) Lichens as a potential source of bioactive secondary metabolites. Lichen secondary metabolites: bioactive properties and pharmaceutical potential 1-29.

  33. Abdullah ST, Hamid H, Ali M (2007) Two new terpenes from the lichen Parmelia perlata. Ind J Chem 46(B):173–176

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mohammed SG (2013) Comparative study of in vitro antibacterial activity of miswak extracts and different toothpastes. Am J Agric Biol Sci 8:82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Montaño AM, Menesses R, Bravo JA, Vila JL (2016) Presence of atranorin in Physcia sorediosa. Rev Boliv Quím 33:175–178

    Google Scholar 

  36. Simirgiotis MJ, Quispe C, Areche C, Sepúlveda B (2016) Phenolic compounds in Chilean Mistletoe (Quintral, Tristerix tetrandus) analyzed by UHPLC–Q/Orbitrap/MS/MS and its antioxidant properties. Molecules 21(3):245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Norouzi H, Azizi A, Gholami M, Sohrabi M, Boustie J (2020) Chemotype variations among lichen ecotypes of Umbilicaria aprina as revealed by LC-ESI-MS/MS: a survey of antioxidant phenolics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(32):40296–40308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to convey their heartfelt thanks to the Head, Department of Biotechnology, MSCBD University, for facilitating laboratory for smooth conduct of experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of the data, or analysis and interpretation of the data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswajit Rath.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradhan, S., Dash, S., Parida, S. et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and GC/MS-based phytochemical analysis of two traditional Lichen species Trypethellium virens and Phaeographis dendritica. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 21, 41 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: