Biosynthesis of a VLP-type nanocarrier specific to cancer cells using the BEVS expression system for targeted drug delivery
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology volume 21, Article number: 20 (2023)
Canine parvovirus (CPV) is a small virus without an envelope that consists of three viral proteins including VP1, VP2, and VP3. Exclusively, the VP2 can form a typically CPV-sized virus-like particle (CPV-VLP) that can be used as a biological nanocarrier for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes since these VLPs can target cancer cells specially through the transferrin surface receptors (TFRs). Consequently, we aimed to produce these nanocarriers to be used for specific targeting of cancer cells.
Sf9 insect cells were transfected with constructed recombinant bacmid shuttle vector encoding an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and CPV-VP2 by the cationic lipids of Cellfectin II. Subsequently, two recombinant baculoviruses expressing EGFP and VP2 were produced and expression of VP2 was increased under the optimal condition. In consequence, the CPV-VLP nanoparticles composed of recombinant VP2 subunits were extracted. The purity of VLPs was then evaluated by SDS-PAGE, and the structural integrity and quality of the final product were evaluated by TEM and HA methods. Eventually, the size distribution of the produced biological nanoparticles and their uniformity were determined by the DLS method.
The expression of EGFP protein was confirmed by fluorescent microscopy, and the expression of VP2 protein was evaluated by SDS-PAGE and western blotting. Infected Sf9 insect cells also showed cytopathic effects (CPEs), and the maximum expression of VP2 occurred at MOI of 10 (pfu/cell) at the harvest time of 72 h post-infection (hpi). After performing various stages of purification, buffer exchange, and concentration, the quality and structural integrity of the VLP product were confirmed. The results of the DLS technique showed the presence of uniform particles (PdI below 0.5) with an approximate size of 25 nm.
The results indicate BEVS as an appropriate and efficient system for generating CPV-VLPs, and the used method based on two-stage ultracentrifugation was appropriate for purifying these nanoparticles. Produced nanoparticles can be used as the biologic nano-carriers in future studies.
Canine parvovirus (CPV) is a small virus approximately 26 nm in diameter, without an envelope and a natural pathogen of dogs consisting of three viral proteins (VPs) including VP1, VP2, and VP3. The VP2 protein is the major component of the viral capsid and binding ligands for CPV to enter the host cell through interaction with the transferrin surface receptors (TFRs). The importance of CPV virus-like particles (CPV-VLP) in binding to human cancer cells motivated researchers to generate these proteins. Most likely, the expression of VP2 alone as the main part of the capsid, surface epitopes, and ligands results in the assembly of typically-sized VLP. Therefore, VLPs can be used as biological nanocarriers for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes [1, 2]. After binding to TFRs, natural CPV enters the cytoplasm through VP2 protein with the mechanism of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Inside the endosome, the decrease in environmental acidity leads to changes in the viral capsid. As a result, the viral capsid protein VP1 could release the virus from the endosome into the cytoplasm by its phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity. Through the microtubule and dynein in the cytoplasm, the viral capsid is transferred to the nucleus. Virus localization to the nucleus, where the virus replicates, requires nuclear localization sequence which is present in the VP1 . In our study, we have used the AcMNPV baculovirus shuttle vector that is commonly used in biotechnology industries which is 80–200kb and consists of polyhedrin and p10 promoters inserted in a circular vector.
The natural receptors for CPV are called transferrin receptors. Transferrin is an iron-carrying protein which strongly required during cell growth. Parvovirus particles can use these receptors to enter the cell; however, since humans consider ineffective to these viruses, they are unable to replicate in human cells. If the transferrin receptor expression is normal, the viral particles cannot enter the cell, while the cancer cells require a considerable amount of iron to grow, and the transferrin receptor is expressed in large amounts. Thereby, the viral particles can enter the cells. Once the virus enters the cell, due to the lack of signals from the nucleus, the next steps for the virus to replicate are not supported and it remains inside the cytoplasm .
Transferrin (TF) is an iron-binding protein that is strongly required during cell growth . Since cancer cells require an impressive amount of iron to grow, the transferrin receptor is highly expressed and presented in various types of cancer cells. Paradoxically, the expression of transferrin receptors in normal cells is extremely low. As a result, high expression of transferrin receptors is considered one of the markers in order to identify cancer cells. The CPV can bind to these receptors and enters the cells; consequently, it is expected that canine parvoviral particles (CPV-VLPs) will be suitable nanoparticles for identifying tumor cells, especially their metastases, and targeting them for drug or gene therapy [4, 5].
The VLPs have a wide range of applications as a biological nanoparticle. These nanoparticles are one of the best tools for the generation of the next-generation viral vaccines as well as drug carriers in cancer therapy, especially the VLP, which naturally contain high affinity for cancer cells, and it is due to their simple generation compared to reverse genetic systems [3, 6,7,8]. They are also suitable alternatives for high-risk agents, killed and attenuated live vaccines that purify the toxic agents in the generation processes. Additionally, their structure is unknown compared with the basic structure; however, for VLP, it is necessary to form a basic and expected structure since necessary subunits are used to form basic ones. Another application of these nanoparticles contains employment as nano-particles to present the main epitopes to the immune system. These VLPs can also act as nano-carriers for drug or gene delivery or delivery of the desired molecules to the target cell specifically [3, 9,10,11].
As mentioned previously [12, 13], first, we generate a mini-Tn7 transposon containing the eukaryotic expression cassette of the VP2 gene in the pFastBac1 donor plasmid vector by two steps of cloning. Then, the recombinant pVP2FastBac1 plasmid was transferred into Escherichia coli DH10Bac competent cells and the recombination of the VP2 gene was accomplished into baculovirus-derived bacmid shuttle vector using the Bac-to-Bac system. The EGFP gene was coupled with the VP2 gene in all steps parallelly, as a control [13, 14]. The constructed recombinant bacmids including VP2 and EGFP genes were analyzed by PCR panel, using designed primers and PUC/M13 universal primers and then transfected into Sf9 insect cells using cationic lipids to generate two new recombinant baculoviruses expressing EGFP and CPV-VP2 (Ethic NO.IR.BMSU.REC.1400.037) .
Sf9 insect cells originated from clone No. 9 of ovarian cells cultured by the larvae of Espodoptera frogiperda. Mycoplasma negative cells attach well to the surface of the glass or flask and form monolayer cells, doubling in number every 18 to 24 h (peak growth rate).
Recombinant expression of EGFP and CPV-VP2 and optimization of expression conditions in insect cells
Following the preparation of high-grade virus seeds on a large scale, in order to optimally express the recombinant protein, it is necessary that Sf9 insect cells with a confluency of 80–85% in the presence of 2% serum become infected with the recombinant virus with high MOI (1–10 pfu/cell). In the baculoviral expression vector system (BEVS), the maximum expression for secretory proteins is between 30 and 72 h post-infection (hpi) (preferably using the high five cell, which is a derivative of the Trichoplusia ni cell line) and for non-secretory proteins 48 to 96 hpi (preferably using Sf9 and Sf21 cells).
Determining the optimal conditions for protein production depends on various factors such as insect cell type, the type of target protein, and the environment used, so both virus MOI and the time of protein harvest on different days should be evaluated.
To perform the experiment, 15 flasks of T25 containing single-layer cell culture were prepared with an initial rate of 5×105 cells per milliliter of culture medium supplemented with 2% bovine serum albumin, and when the cells reached a confluency of 80–85%, slightly higher than the logarithmic half-growth, they were inoculated with two different recombinant viruses expressing VP2 and EGFP separately. In order to perform the experiment, the flasks were divided into three groups of five. Two groups were infected with MOIs 1 and 10 and one group was selected as cell control and all were incubated at 27 ± 0.5° C. One flask from each group was harvested at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpi and compared with control cells for morphology and density. The cells of each harvested flask, after scraping, were centrifuged at low speed and washed with cold PBS at least 1–2 times (until the cells were not suffered or dead) to completely remove the serum. The possibility of washing for adherent cells before padding is not possible for all flasks, because after infection, the cell attachment becomes weaker over time and many cells are even detached, and if the supernatant is removed and the cells are washed, a large portion of the cells are virtually removed, which reduces the expression of total rate.
The final precipitate was suspended in 100 μl of PBS buffer and to prevent degradation of the released proteins, PMSF anti-protease with a final concentration of 1 mM was added to the suspension and the samples were stored at −20 ° C until next use.
After homogenization, all collected samples were first concentrated by the Bradford method to examine the protein product (total protein as well as the target recombinant protein content) to determine the changes in total protein content in each sample), then a specific volume (e.g., 10 μl) of each sample was electrophoresed on a polyacrylamide gel to evaluate and compare changes in total protein as well as target recombinant protein content in different samples.
It should be noted that the volume parameter was fixed, and changes in protein concentration in the samples were examined. The best MOI and harvest time with the highest product quality were selected and used to produce the desired protein in a large scale.
Increasing the expression of recombinant VP2 under the optimal conditions
After optimizing the harvest time of inoculated Sf9 insect cells and selecting the best MOI, Sf9 cells were cultured in at least 30 flasks of T75 and inoculated with recombinant viruses under optimal conditions to produce recombinant CPV-VP2 protein and EGFP. The infected cells were then removed from the flask and collected in 50 ml falcons and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 4 min at 4 °C. After washing twice with cold PBS in order to completely remove the serum and culture medium, the cell precipitate was stored in the −20 °C until the extraction and purification of CPV-VLP, or it was kept at −70 °C by adding the appropriate amount of extraction buffer and transferring to cryotube. It should be considered that whether the serum is not completely removed, in the case of SDS-PAGE with the range of 55–65 kDa, protein bands that interfere with the examined protein appears, so the necessity of removing by proper washing should take into account carefully.
The extraction and purification of the formed VLPs
There are various methods for extracting and purifying VLP produced in insect cells, which are mainly based on the use of sucrose or cesium chloride gradient and ultracentrifugation because VLP is a particle and this is one of the salient features of VLPs. Therefore, it has special floating and sedimentation density. The floating density of CPV natural capsid is about 1.33 g/cm3, its sedimentation rate is between S110 and S122, and its molecular weight is about 5×106 to 2.6×106 g/mol, which is similar to CPV-VLP characteristics. In ultracentrifugation with a sucrose or cesium chloride gradient, different proteins are separated based on their specific buoyancy density. Due to the gradient solution concentration in the centrifuge tube, the density is lower on top of the tube and higher at the bottom. The cell suspension is transferred into a tube, and during centrifugation, each cell component extract is fractionated at a specific level in the tube. In continuous gradient concentration, the concentration changes along the centrifuge tube, and in the presence of large components, an infinite concentration band may form. In the discontinuous gradient concentration, there will be different concentrations and a limited number of levels along the centrifuge tube. In addition, a component may still not be perceptible due to its extremely low density, even at very high cycles and very low-density environments, and may not have the so-called particle properties.
Investigation of the structural integrity of the purified VLPs with transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
The morphology and structural integrity and quality of the purified VLP were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and negative staining. For this purpose, 10 μl of purified VLP sample was placed on a special carbon grade and after 1 min, a large amount of solution was taken with the help of filter paper. Afterwards, 10 μl of 1% (up to 2.5) uranyl acetate stain solution was transferred to the grid and after 1.5 min, a large amount of solution was taken with filter paper and kept to dry at room temperature. After drying, the grades were evaluated by the Hitachi Transmission Electron Microscope (Model HU12-A) with a magnification of 120,000×.
Evaluation of the quality and structural integrity of the purified VLPs by hemagglutination assay (HA)
CPV has a strong ability to agglutinate the red blood cells of chicken. But VP2 protein monomers alone lack this property. Since the VLP of CPV whether formed, has a structure similar to the normal capsid, it is expected to have similar hemagglutination properties. Therefore, hemagglutination assay (HA) with chick red blood cells (RBCs) was used to evaluate the structural integrity and quality of purified VLP.
Preparation of RBC 1%
Some blood was collected from 2- to 3-week-old chicken wings and transferred into a microtube containing 300 μl of PBS and 1 μl of anticoagulant heparin (5000 U/ml). The sample was centrifuged at 1500 rpm and 4 °C for 5 min, the supernatant was gently drained with a Pasteur pipette, and the remaining red blood cells were washed several times with cold PBS until the supernatant was completely clear. Finally, 50 μl of washed RBCs was added to 5 ml of cold PBS and 1% RBC suspension was created.
A 100μl suspension containing 500ng of purified VLP was used, and two-fold dilutions were made in a row of 96 wells plate with a final volume of 50 μl in the PBS buffer, so that in all wells (except the first well), 50 μl of PBS buffer was transferred and 50 μl of the 100 μl protein suspension of the first well was removed and added to the second well. This dilution was performed again by removing 50 μl from the second well and adding to the other wells, respectively. Afterwards, 50 μl of RBC 1% is prepared from chicken blood added to each well and placed at 4 °C for 3 h. In a row, as a negative control, 50 μl of RBC 1% was added with 50 μl of PBS. Moreover, RBC should not be transferred from the start point. Since repeated pipetting during the dilution process leads to the lysis of red blood cells, meanwhile, the dilution of RBC is also disturbed.
During incubation, the VLP forms a network with red blood cells. Therefore, after the end of the above time, in the wells containing appropriate amounts of VLP, there is no sediment formation observed. Additionally, in negative control wells and also wells containing VLP less than the required amount to form a network, red blood cell deposition is observed as a red dot at the bottom wells.
Investigation of the size distribution of formed nanoparticles by dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique
In order to evaluate the size distribution of formed nanoparticles, the dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique was used (Malvern Zeta-sizer). The numbers obtained were calculated based on the loaded protein amount and density in the sample, by the relevant software. The results of CPV-VLP particle size analysis showed that 68.8% of the formed nanoparticles had a size of 25.12 nm and 31.2% have a size of 184.4.
Evaluation of the cells containing the baculovirus encoding EGFP protein with an inverted fluorescent microscope
As demonstrated in the previous studies [12,13,14,15], first we generated two baculoviruses expressing VP2 and EGFP proteins. The expression of recombinant EGFP protein in the cells infected with recombinant baculoviruses encoding the EGFP gene was observed by an inverted fluorescent microscope. With this technique, small amounts of the EGFP protein were clearly visible in non-optimal conditions. The expression of this protein indicated the accuracy of the baculovirus expression system as a control and the relevant processes (Fig. 1).
Estimation of viral titer by sequential dilutions method
Due to the difficulty to work with the baculovirus system and also the plaques resulting from recombinant baculovirus infection are difficult to observe, the sequential dilutions method was used to estimate the amount of produced recombinant viruses. The results showed that the cells inoculated and infected with 1, 10, and 100 μl of P3 baculoviral stock had almost the same CPEs (Fig. 2) and thus had the titer amount of 2×108 pfu/ml. While P2 baculoviral stock had almost the same results in inoculation with only 10 and 100 μl .P1 baculoviral stock showed not the same results. As a result, the titer of the first generation (P1), the second generation (P2), and the third generation (P3) of recombinant baculoviruses were determined to be the coefficient of 106, 107, and 108 pfu/ml, respectively. In order to collect the virus from culture to prepare a viral stock, the suitable MOI is 0.1–1 pfu/cell for inoculation and the number of passages should not exceed P3. Moreover, after preparing high-amount viral seeds, in order to express the recombinant protein, it is necessary to infect Sf9 cells with a recombinant virus by high MOI (1–10 pfu/cell). Since in case of virus inoculation with low MOI (0.1–1 pfu/cell), a 10-fold increase in titer of the next generation compared to inoculated viral titer, is reasonable and expected. Consequently, the first, second, and third generations of the baculoviruses obtained had a sufficient quality for storage as the viral stocks.
Expression of recombinant VP2 in insect cells at two different MOIs
The Bradford assay was used to measure the total protein content in each flask. The amount of total protein in the cell sediment obtained from the culture in a T25 flask inoculated with recombinant baculovirus with MOI of 1 (pfu/cell) at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h was equal to 463.3 μg, 481.5 μg, 524.6 μg, 582.2 μg, and 541.2 μg, respectively, and with MOI of 10 (pfu/cell) at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h was equal to 488.1 μg, 443.4 μg, 408.5 μg, 365.2 μg, and 273.8 μg, respectively. However, the amount of the total protein in cells from the control flasks (not inoculated with the virus) at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h was equal to 710 μg, 1018 μg, 1488 μg, 1422 μg, and 1403 μg, respectively. As can be observed, the total protein content in the control flasks increased with the growth of cells and the increase in the number of them and then decreased with the onset of cell death and the decrease in the number of cells.
In cells infected with MOIs of 1 and 10 (pfu/cell), the total protein content showed a decrease compared with the first-day control flask, indicating that growth stopped in cells infected with recombinant baculovirus and protein synthesis and initiation of recombinant protein expression of virus (thus reducing the expression of other proteins), while during the first 24 h, the control cells continue to proliferate. Over time, the expression of recombinant VP2 and consequently the total protein content in infected cells with MOI of 1 (pfu/cell) increased and from the fourth day onwards, by increasing cell death, the total and recombinant protein content decreased. Despite the fact that cell death occurs in infected cells in the initial days, there is also cell growth in non-infected cells and background expression in SDS-PAGE is almost constant until the fourth day; furthermore, increasing the protein content until the fourth day is due to increased expression of recombinant protein.
In the cells infected with MOI of 10 pfu/cell, at the harvest times of 24, 48, and 72 hpi, the expression of recombinant VP2 showed a significant increase, while the total protein content in these cells decreased with a gradual increase in cell death and from the fourth day onwards, with increasing cell death, the expression of recombinant VP2 also decreased. Figure 3 shows the results of the qualitative evaluation of the expressed recombinant VP2 as well as total protein content in flasks inoculated with MOIs of 1 and 10 (pfu/cell) in the mentioned schedule (compared to the control sample) using the SDS-PAGE method. The control sample used is related to the first 24 h, and the protein content of other samples has been compared.
To calculate the expression percentage of recombinant VP2 protein, the gel documentation system (with BioDoc Analyze 2.2 software) was used (data not shown), and then, the amount of recombinant protein in each flask was calculated. The amount of recombinant VP2 protein obtained from the culture in the T25 flask inoculated with recombinant baculovirus with MOI of 1 (pfu/cell) at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h was equal to 53.5 μg, 62.7 μg, 114.8 μg, 180.5 μg, and 131.5 μg, respectively, and with MOI of 10 (pfu/cell) at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h was equal to 92.73 μg, 181.79 μg, 232.84 μg, 164.34 μg, and 99.06 μg. The maximum expression rate of the VP2 gene with MOIs of 1 and 10 (pfu/cell) was related to the harvest times of 96 and 72 hpi and equivalent to 31% and 57%, respectively. Figure 4a and b show the results of quantitative evaluation of the recombinant VP2 expression rate as well as the total protein content in flasks inoculated with MOIs of 1 and 10 (pfu/cell) in the mentioned schedule (compared to the control sample).
Comparing the results of quantitative analysis of the recombinant VP2 expression rate in the flasks infected with two MOIs of 1 and 10 (pfu/cell) at the mentioned times showed that the highest amount of expression with appropriate quality of the recombinant protein is related to flask inoculated with MOI of 10 (pfu/cell) at the harvest time of 72 hpi. The result of this comparison is shown in Fig. 4c.
Evaluation of the accuracy of the expressed recombinant VP2 by western blotting
With the proper expression of the recombinant VP2, in order to confirm the accuracy of the expressed recombinant protein, the western blotting was performed using a mouse monoclonal antibody against CPV-VP2 and the result of this evaluation showed the accuracy of the recombinant protein expressed in insect cells (Fig. 5a).
Production of recombinant VP2 under the optimal conditions, extraction, and purification of formed biological virus-like nanoparticles (CPV-VLPs)
After optimization of MOI and harvest time of inoculated Sf9 insect cells, by selecting the optimal conditions (MOI of 10 pfu/cell and the harvest time of 72 hpi), the higher levels and sufficient quantities of the recombinant VP2 were produced for VLP formation in insect cells based on the self-assembly of VP2 protein monomers. The VLPs were extracted and purified by chemical and physical lysis methods, followed by two-stage ultracentrifugation using 20% sucrose and discontinuous concentration by a two-layer gradient of 32% and 59% cesium chloride and the protein fraction resulting from the accumulation of the desired nanoparticles (CPV-VLPs) in the tubes containing a discontinuous cesium chloride gradient was harvested after ultracentrifugation (Fig. 5b). After dialysis in order to change the buffer, the purified sample was concentrated using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter with a membrane NMWL of 30 kDa (cutoff = 30 kDa). According to the results of the Bradford assay, the concentration of purified VLP in the final sample obtained from 30 flasks of T75 was equal to 0.85 μg/μl and the amount in the final volume of 1.5 ml was 1.27 mg, which is equivalent to approximately 6% of the total amount of the recombinant expressed VP2 (20.96 mg). Figure 5c shows the protein band (related to VP2 subunits) of the final product by SDS-PAGE after the steps of purification, dialysis, and concentration.
Investigation of the structural integrity of the purified VLPs by TEM
The morphology and structural integrity of the purified VLPs were evaluated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and negative staining. The result of this microscopic analysis is shown in Fig. 6a which confirmed the structural integrity of the VLPs produced.
Evaluation of the quality and structural integrity of the purified VLPs by HA
As described previously, since the VLP has a structure similar to a natural capsid when formed, it is expected to have similar hemagglutination properties. This is why the VP2 monomers alone do not agglutinate the related RBCs. Therefore, in this study, HA was used to evaluate the quality and structural integrity of the formed VLPs and the results showed the preservation of the integrity and also the quality of the produced nanoparticles (Figure 6b).
Investigation of the size distribution of the purified nanoparticles by the DLS technique
The result of VLPs size analysis with Malvern Zeta-sizer (Fig. 6c) showed that 68.8% of the formed nanoparticles had a size of about 25.12 nm and 31.2% of these nanoparticles had a size of about 184.4 nm which is related to the VLP nanoparticles accumulated in the sample. The PdI ˂ 0.5 (0.436) indicated the homogeneity and uniformity of the formed nanoparticles.
The numerical values obtained from this evaluation have been calculated by the relevant software with the formula, based on the amount of loaded protein and its concentration.
Among all examined nanoparticles, the VLPs are quite distinct. Important properties of these nanoparticles include intrinsically nanometric structure and the possibility of penetration into tissues such as cancer tissues; and having a uniform, regular, and symmetrical geometric shape; as well the same size; furthermore, any of the intrinsic controls on these nanoparticles cannot be found in inorganic particles and liposomes, as a result, particle size homogenization and purification require complex. Other properties of produced nanoparticles are high resistance of VLPs to environmental conditions and ease of transport and distribution of materials in the body, biocompatibility and non-toxicity, high production efficiency, high capacity of binding exogenous peptides to their functional groups, and high carrying capacity of drugs.
VLPs are one of the best tools for producing the next-generation vaccines (nano-vaccines), and the definitive future of many vaccines will be VLP-based. This is due to a number of factors, including the ease of VLP production compared to advanced reverse-genetic systems and vector-based vaccines as well as being a suitable alternative to dangerous infectious viral agents, dead and attenuated live vaccines that purifying toxic and virulent agents is crucial in their generation process, and furthermore, their structure is not necessarily the same as the natural structure; however, in the formation of the VLPs, it considers necessary to form a natural and expected structure, since the minimum subunits needed to form the natural structure are in use. Thereby, there is a lack of tools to form other similar and diverse structures. As a result, if the conditions for the formation of a suitable and ideal structure do not exist, there will any structure will be formed. One of the best choices in future viral vaccines is the VLP-based vaccines, since they have all the characteristics of a complete virus but lacks the genome and infectivity [1, 16]; moreover, the NOVAVAX is one of the most reputable vaccine manufacturing companies in the world and is currently conducting extensive research on the production of VLP for all types of infectious viruses such as COVID-19 (Nuvaxovid), HIV, RSV, and Ebola in the pre-clinical and clinical stages. Another application of these nanoparticles in vaccine production is their use as nano-substrates for the presentation of various epitopes to the immune system .
Due to the VLP feature, the produced nanoparticles can be used as nanocarriers in order to deliver drugs, nucleic acids for gene therapy, and desired molecules to target cells, specifically. These applications are important in the treatment of diseases such as cancer, especially in the case of the CPV-VLP, as of its inherent property of binding to cancer cells .
Most research in the world on VLP production has been done so far on vaccine development for seasonal influenza viruses and other various strains such as H5N1 and H1N1 [19,20,21,22,23]. The first successful attempt in the world to generate VLP has been made against human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes cervical cancer, genital warts, and other rare types of cancer [16, 24,25,26], and currently, there are two VLP-based HPV vaccines in the market: Gardasil (or Silgard), which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and produced by Merck as well as Cervarix, which received this approval in 2009 and was produced by GlaxoSmithKline [26, 27].
In 2006, Singh and colleagues used a traditional baculovirus system by homologous recombination method in T. ni insect cells to produce these VLPs . According to the report, the production efficiency in the mentioned cell is about 0.5 mg per liter of suspended culture, which is extremely low. In our study, while using the convenient and low-cost expression system, the amount of the VLP produced was more than 5 mg per liter of monolayer culture, which can increase significantly by optimizing the purification process and using suspended culture. In our experiments, the Sf9 cell was used instead of the T. ni cell which has a very high efficiency in the expression of recombinant proteins and the new Bac-to-Bac expression vector system with site-specific transposition mechanism (instead of traditional homologous recombination) was used to produce the recombinant baculovirus expressing VP2, which has much higher efficiency of recombination. However, the previous mentioned system requires time and cost to isolate recombinant and non-recombinant viruses and that the process is with low efficiency of plaque production method [32,33,34,35,36], while in the present study, these issues were solved and furthermore the quality of generated VLP was evaluated and confirmed. In Singh’s study, a single-stage ultracentrifugation method was used to separate and purify the VLP, which is due to the presence of impurities, the separation of the desired fraction from others is more crucial. According to the data of international standard tables and the buoyancy density of the desired particle , the use of a two-step method using sucrose and the discontinuous gradient of calcium chloride was found to be more suitable for the separation of these particles  and the experience gained in the present study showed the robust results.
In 2014, Xu et al. evaluated the self-assembly of virus-like particles of CPV from the capsid subunits expressed in E. coli for use as a vaccine . In that study, most of the expressed VP2 proteins were produced in the form of inclusion bodies, which used the SUMO fusion motif as a solubilizing motif to increase the expression efficiency in the soluble form. After expressing SUMO-VP2 chimeric protein and its extraction and purification, they had to cut the motif added to the VP2 protein and re-purify the VP2, a process that reduced the efficiency of the system to generate CPV-VLP and required time and cost. In addition, the use of prokaryotic expression systems for expressing eukaryotic and viral proteins has important disadvantages.
One of the advantages and strengths of this study (in order to solve these problems) is the selection of a baculoviral expression vector system (BEVS) along with the appropriate expression host, as one of the most powerful and efficient eukaryotic expression systems , so that the resulting protein in these systems has a proper folding with a structure and function similar to natural protein , which is very important in the formation of VLPs . Our previous studies also showed methods for producing recombinant fused proteins [42, 43]..
Our study demonstrated that the BEVS using the Sf9 insect cells on the basis of a new Bac-to-Bac expression system with a site-specific transposition mechanism is a suitable and efficient system for the production of CPV-VLP and the used method based on two-stage ultracentrifugation also was appropriate for purifying these nanoparticles. The VLPs produced can be used as the biologic nanocarriers to deliver drugs, nucleic acids, and desired molecules into the target cells such as human cancer cells, specifically. All assessments were conducted in accordance with ethical principles and under the supervision of the University's Ethics Committee (Ethic NO.IR.BMSU.REC.1400.037).
Availability of data and materials
Lee LA (2010) A multivalent ligand display system with plant viruses: a novel approach towards studying spatial effects of cell adhesion ligands. University of South Carolina
Berns KI (1990) Parvovirus replication. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 54(3):316–329
Reed AP, Jones EV, Miller TJ (1988) Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of canine parvovirus. J Virol 62(1):266–276
Parker JS et al (2001) Canine and feline parvoviruses can use human or feline transferrin receptors to bind, enter, and infect cells. J Virol 75(8):3896–3902
Gomme PT, McCann KB, Bertolini J (2005) Transferrin: structure, function and potential therapeutic actions. Drug Discov Today 10(4):267–273
Pushko P, Tretyakova I (2020) Influenza virus like particles (VLPs): opportunities for H7N9 vaccine development. Viruses 12(5):518
Dowaidar M. (2021) Gene-free Viral-like particles (VLPs) offer a safer alternative to inactivating or weakening viral strains for traditional vaccines. VLP-based vaccinations without adjuvants have been found to promote humoral and cellular immunity.
Lei X, Cai X, Yang Y (2020) Genetic engineering strategies for construction of multivalent chimeric VLPs vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 19(3):235–246
Bogani G et al (2020) The adoption of viral capsid-derived virus-like particles (VLPs) for disease prevention and treatments. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p 432
Wang C et al (2020) Active delivery of VLPs promotes anti-tumor activity in a mouse ovarian tumor model. Small 16(20):1907150
de Jesús Jiménez-Chávez Á et al (2021) B19-VLPs as an effective delivery system for tumour antigens to induce humoral and cellular immune responses against triple negative breast cancer. Immunol Lett 239:77–87
Hashemzadeh MS et al (2016) Generation of mini-Tn7 transposone by cloning of CPV-VP2 into eukaryotic expression cassette, in E. coli. Int J Pharmaceut Res Allied Sci 5(3):343–349
Hashemzadeh MS et al (2016) Cloning, subcloning and recombination of VP2 gene of canine parvovirus into baculoviral shuttle vector enabling its expression in insect cells. Pharm Lett 8(5):119–127
Hashemzadeh MS et al (2016) Construction of a recombinant bacmid DNA encoding viral protein-2 of canine parvovirus using site-specific transposition mechanism. Iioab J 7(7):22–27
Hashemzadeh MS et al (2017) Designing two individual AcMNPV polyhedrin-plus Bac-to-Bac expression system in order to express GFP and CPV-VP2 in insect cells. Iran J Biotechnol 15(3):172
Wang JW, Roden RB (2013) Virus-like particles for the prevention of human papillomavirus-associated malignancies. Expert Rev Vaccines 12(2):129–141
Zdanowicz M, Chroboczek J (2016) Virus-like particles as drug delivery vectors. Acta Biochim Pol 63(3):469–473
Manchester M, Steinmetz NF (2009) Viruses and nanotechnology. Preface. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol 327:123–141
Matassov D, Cupo A, Galarza JM (2007) A novel intranasal virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine designed to protect against the pandemic 1918 influenza a virus (H1N1). Viral Immunol 20(3):441–452
Tao P et al (2009) Virus-like particle vaccine comprised of the HA, NA, and M1 proteins of an avian isolated H5N1 influenza virus induces protective immunity against homologous and heterologous strains in mice. Viral Immunol 22(4):273–281
Krammer F et al (2010) Swine-origin pandemic H1N1 influenza virus-like particles produced in insect cells induce hemagglutination inhibiting antibodies in BALB/c mice. Biotechnol J: Healthcare Nutr Technol 5(1):17–23
Krammer F et al (2010) Trichoplusia ni cells (high five TM) are highly efficient for the production of influenza a virus-like particles: a comparison of two insect cell lines as production platforms for influenza vaccines. Mol Biotechnol 45(3):226–234
Rezaei F et al (2013) Influenza virus-like particle containing two different subtypes of hemagglutinin confers protection in mice against lethal challenge with a/PR8 (H1N1) and a/HK (H3N2) viruses. Iran Red Crescent Med J 15(1):75
Kirnbauer R et al (1993) Efficient self-assembly of human papillomavirus type 16 L1 and L1-L2 into virus-like particles. J Virol 67(12):6929–6936
Nasir Uddin M (2015) Alternative vaccine strategies for cervical cancer. J Develop Drugs 4:2
Schiller JT et al (2008) An update of prophylactic human papillomavirus L1 virus-like particle vaccine clinical trial results. Vaccine 26:K53–K61
Rothengass BE (2007) Advocating for the quadravalent HPV vaccination, Gardasil, by Merck. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 4(71):671–672
Abdoli A et al (2013) Human papillomavirus type16-L1 VLP production in insect cells. Iranian J Basic Med Sci 16(8):891
Bolhassani A et al (2015) VLP production in Leishmania tarentolae: a novel expression system for purification and assembly of HPV16 L1. Protein Expr Purif 116:7–11
Behzadian F et al (2013) Baculoviral co-expression of HA, NA and M1 proteins of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in insect cells. Jundishapur J Microbiol 6(9):6
Najafi S et al (2012) Baculoviral expression of influenza a virus (H1N1 New Caledonia) neuraminidase in insect cells. Iranian J Virol 6(2):12–17
Singh P et al (2006) Canine parvovirus-like particles, a novel nanomaterial for tumor targeting. J Nanobiotechnol 4(1):2
Petricevich VL et al (2001) Parameters that determine virus adsorption kinetics: toward the design of better infection strategies for the insect cell-baculovirus expression system. Enzym Microb Technol 29(1):52–61
Tomiya N et al (2004) Comparing N-glycan processing in mammalian cell lines to native and engineered lepidopteran insect cell lines. Glycoconj J 21(6):343–360
O'Reilly DR, Miller LK, Luckow VA (1994) Baculovirus expression vectors: a laboratory manual. Oxford University Press on Demand
Kitts PA, Ayres MD, Possee RD (1990) Linearization of baculovirus DNA enhances the recovery of recombinant virus expression vectors. Nucleic Acids Res 18(19):5667–5672
Cotmore SF, Tattersall P (2007) Parvoviral host range and cell entry mechanisms. Adv Virus Res 70:183–232
Jeong H-S et al (2006) Evaluation of viral clearance in the production of HPV-16 L1 virus-like particles purified from insect cell cultures. Biologicals 34(4):273–279
Xu J et al (2014) Self-assembly of virus-like particles of canine parvovirus capsid protein expressed from Escherichia coli and application as virus-like particle vaccine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(8):3529–3538
Bateman RM, Rudall PJ, Moura M (2013) Systematic revision of Platanthera in the Azorean archipelago: not one but three species, including arguably Europe’s rarest orchid. PeerJ 1:e218
Li B et al (2003) Expression, purification and serological analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma associated antigen HCA587 in insect cells. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 9(4):678
Mohammadi M et al (2022) Utilization of SUMO tag and freeze-thawing method for high level expression and solubilization of recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2) protein in E. coli. Protein Pept Lett 29(7):605
Hashemzadeh MS et al (2021) Expression, solubilization, refolding and final purification of recombinant proteins as expressed in the form of “classical inclusion bodies” in E. coli. Protein Pept Lett 28(2):122–130
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All assessments were conducted in accordance with ethical principles and under the supervision of the University's Ethics Committee (Ethic NO.IR.BMSU.REC.1400.037).
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: Figs. 3, 4, and 6 have been corrected.
About this article
Cite this article
Hashemzadeh, M.S., Gharari, N. Biosynthesis of a VLP-type nanocarrier specific to cancer cells using the BEVS expression system for targeted drug delivery. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 21, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00479-9
- BEVS system
- Sf9 cell