Skip to main content
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Download PDF

Characterization, antimicrobial and antitumor activity of superoxide dismutase extracted from Egyptian honeybee venom (Apis mellifera lamarckii)

Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology volume 21, Article number: 21 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Superoxide dismutase is an important antioxidative stress enzyme which is found in honeybee venom and has a wide pharmaceutical and medical applications.

Results

We reported the purification and characterization of venom SOD from Egyptian honeybee Apis mellifera lamarckii and termed BVSOD. It was purified to homogeneity from the Egyptian honeybee venom. The purification procedures included crude extraction, DEAE-cellulose anion exchange column chromatography, and Sephacryl S-300 gel filtration column chromatography. The purified BVSOD is found to be homogeneous as investigated by native PAGE. It exhibited homodimeric structure with a molecular weight of native form of 32 kDa and subunits of 16.0 kDa. It displayed the maximum activity at pH 7.4. CuCl2, ZnCl2, and MgCl2 and elevated the activity of BVSOD, while CoCl2, FeCl2, and NiCl2 inhibited BVSOD activity. Potassium cyanide and hydrogen peroxide were most potent inhibitors for BVSOD activity suggesting that it is a Cu/Zn-SOD type.

Conclusions

The purified BVSOD is found to have antimicrobial and antitumor activities which can be used for various medical and clinical applications.

Background

Superoxide dismutases (SODs) are a family of antioxidant metalloenzymes which defend against oxidative stress resulting from reactive oxygen species by scavenging superoxide radicals [1, 2]. SODs are catalyzing the disproportionation of superoxide free radicals to H2O2 and H2O to protect cells against their harmful effects [3, 4]. SODs are classified into four groups according to active site metal species, Mn-SOD, Cu/Zn-SOD, Ni-SOD, and Fe-SOD [5,6,7,8,9]. SODs have increasing commercial applications in cosmetics, clinical nutrition, and pharmaceutical industries [10]. SODs are used as antioxidant drugs in many diseases [11]. SODs are found to have antiviral and anti-inflammatory activities [12]. SODs have been studied in many of insect species, and it plays a protective role against oxidative stress caused by environmental stressors such as cold, heat, heavy metals, starvation, insecticides, and pathogens [13,14,15,16]. Bee venom is a pharmacologically complex mixture containing active enzymes, peptides, and proteins [17]. Bee venom is a secretion of bee’s sting apparatus and used to protect bees from any enemies [18, 19]. Bee venom is found to have antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, radioprotective, antimutagenic, immunity-promoting, antinociceptive, anticancer, and hepatocyte-protective activities so it is used in treating many diseases in folk medicine [20,21,22,23,24]. The aim of the present work is to purify SOD from the Egyptian honeybee venom Apis mellifera lamarckii, comprehensively discuss their characteristics, with emphasis on their potential antibacterial and antitumor activities.

Materials and methods

Materials

Collection of venom

The honeybee colonies were obtained from governorate of Asuit Egyptian subspecies Apis mellifera lamarckii. Venom was extracted from workers. Five-hundred workers of foraging bees were catched at the colony entry and rapid freezed at − 20 °C to immobilized. Bees were handly dissected; venom reservoir and sting device were removed, then disrupted in Eppendorf with 2.5 ml of H2O, and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g, 5 min, 4 °C. The supernatants were obtained and designated venom extract.

Chemicals

Xanthine sodium salt, xanthine oxidase enzyme, cytochrome C from horse heart, nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), phenyl methosulfate (PMS), phenymethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1,4 dithiothreitol (DTT), 1,10 phenanthroline, trypan blue dye, bovine serum albumin (BSA), blue dextran, crystal violet, Sephacryl S-300, DEAE cellulose, and kits of gel filtration molecular weight marker were product of Sigma Co. SDS molecular weight marker proteins were purchased from Pharmacia Co., DMEM, fetal bovine serum, HEPES buffer solution, RPMI-1640, gentamycin, and L-glutamine are purchased from Lonza, Belgium.

Methods

SOD activity assay

SOD activity assay was based on the SOD ability to inhibit reduction of cytochrome C by scavenging superoxide anion formed by xanthine-xanthine oxidase system. The reaction mixture assay is 1.0 ml buffer 20 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate (pH 7.8), containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.01 mM cytochrome C, and 0.05 mM sodium xanthine. Reaction started by 21 munit of xanthine oxidase that reacts with sodium xanthine (substrate) producing superoxide anion that makes a reduction to cytochrome C at 550 nm. One unit activity of SOD is the amount which causes 50% reaction inhibition for reduction rate of cytochrome C [25].

Staining of SOD activity on polyacrylamide gels

Staining of SOD activity was determined according to Weisiger and Fridovich method [26]. Determination of activity of SOD following electrophoresis was carried out by a reaction mixture containing phenazine methosulfate (PMS) and nitroblue tetrazolium salt (NBT) that produced superoxide anions, and then, formazan was formed by reduction of NBT by superoxide. Achromatic zones appeared on gel where superoxide radicals disappeared due to SOD activity preventing the NBT reduction. A buffered reaction mixture of NBT and PMS applied on gels and then exposed for minutes to sun daylight until achromatic zones indicating SOD activity formed on a blue background of gel.

Purification of bee venom superoxide dismutase

The BVSOD was isolated from Apis mellifera lamarckii by two chromatographic steps: chromatography on DEAE-cellulose column and Sephacryl S-300 column. Venom extract was loaded onto DEAE-cellulose column (12 cm × 2.4 cm i.d.) pre-equilibrated with 20 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The elution of adsorbed proteins was carried out with stepwise NaCl gradient of 0 to 1 M in the same buffer at flow rate of 60 ml/h. Fractions of 3 ml were collected and analyzed for protein content and enzyme activity. Fractions containing SOD activity were pooled and concentrated. The concentrated enzyme was processed on a column Sephacryl S-300 (142 cm × 1.75 cm i.d.) which equilibrated and run with 20 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) in a 30 ml/h flow rate. Fractions of 2 ml volume containing SOD were pooled. The protein concentration was measured following the method of Bradford, by using bovine serum albumin as standard [27].

Native and SDS/PAGE gel electrophoresis

Purification steps, venom extract, chromatography on DEAE-cellulose column, and chromatography on Sephacryl S-300 column fraction are investigated by 7% native PAGE electrophoresis. Gel electrophoresis was achieved using 7% native PAGE using method of Smith [28] and SDS/PAGE which was carried out with 12% PAGE using method of Laemmli [29]. The molecular weight of purified SOD enzyme was determined using SDS-PAGE according to Weber and Osborn [30]. Proteins stained using Coomassie brilliant blue (R-250) 0.25% conc. SOD activity stained on PAGE according to Weisiger and Fridovich [26].

Antimicrobial activity determination

A total of 500 µg/ml of purified BVSOD was dissolved by methanol, and 50-μl aliquots were soaked on discs of filter paper (Whatman No. 1) and dried [31]. The discs were distributed on agar plates surface inoculated with microbes to be tested and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C for bacteria and 48 h at 30 °C for fungi and yeast. Yeast and bacteria were grown on nutrient agar; fungi were grown on PDA (DSMZ 130) medium. After incubation, the inhibition zones of diameter were measured for tested microorganisms: Proteus mirabilis ATCC 25,933, Salmonella typhi ATCC6539, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 43,816, Candida albicans ATCC10231, and Aspergillus niger NRRLA-326. Oxytetracycline (OT) was used as reference standard. The tested microbes were obtained from National Research Center, Egypt, Microbial Chemistry Department, Culture Collection Center.

Antitumor activity determination

Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG-2 cells) and human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7 cells) were obtained from VACSERA, Egypt, Tissue Culture Unit. The cells were propagated in medium of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle with HEPES buffer, 50 µg/ml gentamycin, 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, and 1% L-glutamine. Cells were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C and subcultured two times a week. For assay of cytotoxicity, 100 µl medium was seeded in 96-well plate with 1 × 104 cells/well concentration. Fresh growth medium containing purified BVSOD with different concentrations was added. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the yield of viable cells was spectrophotometrically determined at 490 nm. Treated cells and control cells (in the absence of purified BVSOD) were compared. The cytotoxic effect of purified BVSOD was calculated by [(ODt/ODc)] × 100% where ODt is optical density mean of treated wells with purified BVSOD, and ODc is optical density mean of untreated cells. The survival curve (relation between purified BVSOD concentration and surviving cells) was plotted. A total of 50% concentration of inhibition (IC50) was determined from graphic plots of curve for each concentration. The microscopic examination of the tumor cells treated with purified BVSOD and control cells was carried out. The cells were stained, and cellular morphology was investigated using an inverted microscope and a digital microscopy camera to capture the images [32,33,34].

Results

Purification of superoxide dismutase

The superoxide dismutase starting specific activity in venom extract was 321 units/mg protein. One peak of superoxide dismutase activity (BVSOD) was resolved from DEAE cellulose and was eluted with 0 M NaCl of 20 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) (Fig. 1). BVSOD-specific activity of DEAE-cellulose pooled fraction was increased 1.83-fold over venom crude extract with 53.9% recovery. The elution profile of Sephacryl S-300 column showed one peak of superoxide dismutase activity (Fig. 2). After chromatography, the specific activity of superoxide dismutase enzyme was raised to 1250 units/mg protein that represent 3.89-fold with 21.0% yield (Table 1). The molecular weight of BVSOD was determined from gel filtration column elution volume to be 32 kDa.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A chromatographic typical elution profile for honeybee venom extract on DEAE-cellulose column (12 cm × 2.4 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 20 mmol L.−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

A chromatographic typical elution profile for the concentrated pooled DEAE-cellulose fractions containing superoxide dismutase enzyme activity on Sephacryl S-300 column (142 cm × 1.75 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 20 mmol L.−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)

Full size image
Table 1 A Typical purification scheme of BVSOD
Full size table

Electrophoretic analysis

Purification steps, venom extract, DEAE cellulose, and Sephacryl S-300 fraction were loaded on 7% native PAGE electrophoresis. One band of protein agreed with SOD activity band denoting purity of BVSOD preparation (Fig. 3 a and b). Electrophoretic analysis of BVSOD on SDS/PAGE was compared to markers protein and showed its molecular weight subunit to be 16 kDa (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Electrophoretic analysis of superoxide dismutase (enzyme protein pattern) of the different purification steps on 7% native polyacrylamide gel: (1) crude venom, (2) DEAE-cellulose fraction, and (3) Sephacryl S-300 purified fraction of BVSOD. b Electrophoretic analysis of superoxide dismutase (enzyme activity pattern) of the different purification steps on 7% native polyacrylamide gel: (1) crude venom, (2) DEAE-cellulose fraction, and (3) Sephacryl S-300 purified fraction of BVSOD. c Subunit molecular weight determination by electrophoretic analysis of purified BVSOD on 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gel: (1) molecular weight marker proteins and (2) purified superoxide dismutase

Full size image

Effect of pH

The pH effect on purified BVSOD was carried out utilizing buffer 20 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate with values of pH between (5.7 and 8.0). The highest activity of BVSOD was recorded at pH 7.4 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

pH effect on purified BVSOD using 0.02 M phosphate buffer, pH (5.8–8.0)

Full size image

Effect of cations and inhibitors

The divalent cations effect and inhibitors effect on activity of purified BVSOD was measured after preincubation at 37 °C with 2 and 5 mM of each cation and each inhibitor. A control without cations and inhibitors was taken 100% activity. CuCl2, ZnCl2, and MgCl2 elevated activity of BVSOD, while FeCl2, CoCl2, and NiCl2 inhibited activity of BVSOD (Table 2). Potassium cyanide and hydrogen peroxide were most potent inhibitors for BVSOD activity. DL-Dithiothreitol, EDTA, 1,10-phenanthroline, β-mercaptoethanol, iodoacetamide, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and potassium dichromate inhibited BVSOD activity (Table 3).

Table 2 Effect of divalent cations on BVSOD
Full size table
Table 3 Effect of various inhibitors on BVSOD
Full size table

Antimicrobial and antitumor activity

The purified BVSOD was screened for its antimicrobial activity. All data expressed as the mean of three reads, while no difference between reads has been observed. The inhibition zone for purified BVSOD was determined and compared with the reference standard (Fig. 5). Results of antimicrobial screening are shown in Table 4. The data obtained showed that BVSOD have an antimicrobial activity. Results showed that the BVSOD exhibited good antibacterial activity against Proteus mirabilis ATCC 25,933, Salmonella typhi ATCC6539, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 43,816 with inhibition zone (13 mm, 15 mm, and 15 mm), respectively. On the other hand, the antifungal activity of BVSOD was also measured, and the obtained results showed that BVSOD displayed a potent anticandidal activity with inhibition zone 22 mm, while the activity was also strong against Aspergillus niger with inhibition zone 18 mm. The purified BVSOD was screened for its antitumor activity (Tables 5) using human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG-2 cells) and human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7 cells). BVSOD was found to have antitumor activity (Figs. 6 and 7).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Antimicrobial activity of purified BVSOD

Full size image
Table 4 Determination of antimicrobial activity
Full size table
Table 5 Determination of antitumor activity
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

a Inhibitory activity of purified BVSOD against hepatocellular carcinoma cells. b Inhibitory activity of purified BVSOD against breast carcinoma cells

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Morphological evaluation of cytotoxicity of purified BVSOD against HepG2 cell line using different concentrations and compared with HepG2 non-treated cell as a control. a HepG2 cells treated with BVSOD at 500 µg/ml. b HepG2 cells treated with BVSOD at 62.5 µg/ml. c HepG2 cells treated with BVSOD at 7.8 µg/ml. d HepG2cells non-treated (cell control)

Full size image

Discussion

It is well established that SOD (EC 1.15.1.1) serves a key antioxidant role [35]. SODs have been studied in venoms of many parasitoids such as Cotesia chilonis, Leptopilina boulardi, Diversinervus elegans, and Tetrastichus brontispae [36,37,38]; these studies suggest that SOD is present in parasitoids venom. The present study demonstrated a simple and reproducible purification method of the superoxide dismutase from venom of Egyptian honeybee Apis mellifera lamarckii. The BVSOD was isolated from Apis mellifera lamarckii by two chromatographic steps. The chromatographic profile obtained from DEAE-cellulose column showed a well-defined fraction identified as BVSOD. The pooled fraction-specific activity of BVSOD was increased 1.83-fold over venom extract with 53.9% recovery. After chromatography on Sephacryl S-300 column, BVSOD-specific activity was raised to 1250 units/mg protein that represent purification fold of 3.89 and 21.0% yield. Present findings are comparative to SOD of Italian honeybee Apis mellifera royal jelly previously isolated with 53.05 units/mg specific activity [39]. Purification steps are investigated by 7% native PAGE electrophoresis. One protein band agreed with BVSOD activity band denoting purity of BVSOD preparation. The molecular weight of BVSOD was investigated from gel filtration column elution volume to be 32 kDa. Electrophoretic analysis of BVSOD and protein markers on SDS/PAGE was compared and showed BVSOD molecular weight subunit to be 16 kDa; this is consistent with SOD previously isolated from silkworm, Bombyx mori [40], with SOD isolated from Drosophila melanogaster [41] and 29.3 kDa from midgut of Helicoverpa armigera larvae [42]. The effect of pH on the purified BVSOD was carried out utilizing buffer 20 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate with values of pH between 5.7 and 8.0. The highest activity of BVSOD was recorded at pH 7.4, while midgut of Helicoverpa armigera larvae SOD showed maximum activity at pH 11.0 [42]. CuCl2, ZnCl2, and MgCl2 elevated the activity of BVSOD, while FeCl2, CoCl2, and NiCl2 inhibited activity of BVSOD. These results are in accordance with SOD from muscle tissue of the shrimp Macrobrachium nipponense and from Marinomonas sp. bacteria which were markedly enhanced by ZnCl2 and inhibited by FeCl2 [43, 44]. Differentiation between SODs classes is based on selective chemicals inhibition [45, 46]. Types of SODs can be differentiated by its inhibition susceptibility to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and potassium cyanide (KCN) [47,48,49]. It is well-known that the superoxide dismutase isoenzyme that is very sensitive to potassium cyanide inhibition and inhibited with hydrogen peroxide is cupper/zinc containing isoenzyme [10, 50]. In this study, potassium cyanide (KCN) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are found to be potent inhibitors of purified BVSOD activity suggesting that it is a copper/zinc containing enzyme. 1,10-Phenanthroline and EDTA-inhibited BVSOD activity indicate that BVSOD is a metalloenzyme. Dithiothreitol and β-mercaptoethanol-inhibited BVSOD activity indicate that active site containing − SH groups play a major role for enzyme activity. Similarly, SOD of Radix lithospermi seed is sensitive to thiol compounds [46]. PMSF and iodoacetamide inhibited BVSOD activity indicating that serine, cysteine, methionine, and histidine residues have important effects on enzyme structure and activity; these results are in accordance with SOD of chicken liver [47]. The activity inhibition of BVSOD with K2Cr2O7 may be due to metal prosthetic groups oxidation which is a principle for enzyme activity. SOD of muscle tissue of the shrimp is also susceptible to K2Cr2O7 [43]. Antimicrobial activity results showed that BVSOD have a good antibacterial activity against Proteus mirabilis ATCC 25,933, Salmonella typhi ATCC6539, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 43,816. BVSOD displayed a potent anticandidal activity, while the activity was also strong against Aspergillus niger. BVSOD was screened for its antitumor activity using human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG-2 cells) and human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7 cells). BVSOD was found to have a potent antitumor activity against HepG-2 cells and have an inhibitory effect against MCF-7 cells. A total of 500 µg of BVSOD causes 98.03 inhibition for HepG-2 cells, and 1 µg of BVSOD causes 10.58 inhibition. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of BVSOD against HepG2 cell was estimated to be 6.67 µg. Morphological evaluation of cytotoxicity of BVSOD against HepG2 cell line was carried out using different concentrations of BVSOD and compared with HepG2 non-treated cell as a control.

Conclusions

This study presents a simple, fast, and reproducible isolation and characterized protocols of SOD from venom of Egyptian honeybee Apis mellifera lamarckii. The method can scaled up from the laboratory level to semi-pilot and pilot levels for production of this enzyme in larger scales. The purified BVSOD found to have antimicrobial and antitumor activities which can be used for various medical and clinical applications. The present study will help in finding the optimum conditions for the enzyme activity, and this will be helpful in BVSOD uses in various applications with high efficiency.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

BVSOD:

Bee venom superoxide dismutase

NBT:

Nitroblue tetrazolium

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

PMS:

Phenyl methosulfate

PMSF:

Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride

DTT:

1,4-Dithiothreitol

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

DEAE-cellulose:

Diethylaminoethyl cellulose

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

HEPES:

(4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid)

HepG-2 cells:

Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line

MCF-7 cells:

Human breast cancer cell line

References

  1. De ObesoFernández Del Valle A, Scheckhuber CQ (2022) Superoxide dismutases in eukaryotic microorganisms: four case studies. Antioxidants (Basel) 11(2):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020188.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujii J, Homma T, Osaki TH (2022) Superoxide radicals in the execution of cell death. Antioxidants (Basel) 11(3):501. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oka S, Hirai J, Yasukawa T, Nakahara Y, Inoue YH (2015) A correlation of reactive oxygen species accumulation by depletion of superoxide dismutases with age-dependent impairment in the nervous system and muscles of Drosophila adults. Biogerontology 16(4):485–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-015-9570-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabunoki H, Gorman MJ, Dittmer NT, Kanost MR (2016) Superoxide dismutase 2 knockdown leads to defects in locomotor activity, sensitivity to paraquat, and increased cuticle pigmentation in Triboliumcastaneum. Sci Rep 8(6):29583. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bao Y, Li L, Xu F, Zhang G (2009) Intracellular copper/zinc superoxide dismutase from bay scallop Argopecten irradians: its gene structure, mRNA expression and recombinant protein. Fish Shellfish Immunol 27(2):210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2009.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bittencourt SET, Castro LA, Farias SE, Bao SN, Schrank A, Vainstein MH (2004) Purification and ultrastructral localization of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase from entomopathogenic and a caricide fungus Metarhizium anisopiia. Res Microbiol 155(8):681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheng L, Zheng X, Tong H, Liu S, Du J, Liu Q (2004) Purification and characterization of cytosolic isoenzyme III of Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase from tobacco leaves. Plant Sci 167(6):1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miao L, Daret K, Clair S (2009) Regulation of superoxide dismutase genes: implications in disease. Free Radic Biol Med 47(4):344–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh K, Tyagi N, Kumar P, Singh U, el Go N (2010) Stabilization of Mn (II) and Mn (III) in mononuclear complexes derived from tridentate ligands with N2O donors: synthesis, crystal structure, superoxide dismutase activity and DNA interaction studies. J Inorg Biochem 104(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai K, Sivakami S (2007) Purification and biochemical characterization of a superoxide dismutase from the soluble fraction of the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23(12):1661–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9413-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muzykantov VR (2001) Targeting of superoxide dismutase and catalase to vascular endothelium. J Control Release 71(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00215-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Agnillo F, Chang T (1998) Polyhemoglobin-superoxide dismutase-catalase as a blood substitute with antioxidant properties. Nat B iotechnol 16(7):667–671. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0798-667

  13. Jia H, Sun R, Shi W, Yan Y, Li H, Guo X, Xu B (2014) Characterization of a mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase gene from Apis cerana cerana and its role in oxidative stress. J Insect Physiol 60:68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koo HN, Lee SG, Yun SH, Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim GH (2016) Comparative analyses of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) at the mRNA level between Apis mellifera Land Apis cerana F(Hymenoptera: Apidae) under stress conditions. J Insect Sci 16(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikolić TV, Purać J, Orčić S, Kojić D, Vujanović D, Stanimirović Z, Blagojević DP (2015) Environmental effects on superoxide dismutase and catalase activity and expression in honeybee. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 90(4):181–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu H, Zhang Y, Shi X, Zhang J, Ma E (2017) Overexpression of Mn-superoxide dismutase in Oxya chinensismediates increased malathion tolerance. Chemosphere 181:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaerenbergh VM, Debyser G, Devreese B, de Graaf DC (2014) Exploring the hidden honeybee (Apismellifera) venom proteome by integrating a combinatorial peptide ligand library approach with FTMS. J Proteomics 17(99):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.04.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wehbe R, Frangieh J, Rima M, El Obeid D, Sabatier JM, Fajloun Z (2019) Bee venom: overview of main compounds and bioactivities for therapeutic interests. Molecules 24(16):2997. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hossen MS, Shapla UM, Gan SH, Khalil MI (2016) Impact of bee venom enzymes on diseases and immune responses. Molecules 22(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim B-S, Moon HJ, Li DX, Gil M, Min JK, Lee G, Bae H, Kim SK, Min B-I (2013) Effect of bee venom acupuncture on oxaliplatin-induced cold allodynia in rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:369324. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/369324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park YC, Koh PS, Seo BK, Lee JW, Cho NS, Park HS, Park DS, Baek YH (2014) Long-term effectiveness of bee venom acupuncture and physiotherapy in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a one-year follow-up analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med 20(12):919–924. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2014.0220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zidan HAG, Mostafa ZK, Ibrahim MA, Haggag SI, Darwish DA, Elfiky AA (2018) Venom composition of Egyptian and Carniolan honeybee, Apismellifera L. affected by collection methods. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci 11(4):59–71. https://doi.org/10.21608/EAJBSA.2018.17733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdel-Monsef MM, Zidan HA, Darwish DA, Masoud HM, Helmy MS, Ibrahim MA (2020) Biochemical isolation and characterization of hyaluronidase enzyme from venom of Egyptian honeybee Apismelliferalamarckii. J Apic Sci 64:153–164. https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2020-0015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Darwish DA, Masoud HMM, Abdel-Monsef MM, Helmy MS, Zidan HA, Ibrahim MA (2021) Phospholipase A2 enzyme from the venom of Egyptian honeybee Apis mellifera lamarckii with anti-platelet aggregation and anti-coagulation activities. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 19(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00112-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCord JM, Fridovich I (1969) Superoxide dismutase: an enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J Biol Chem 244:6049–6055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weisiger RA, Fridovich I (1973) Superoxide dismutase: organelle specificity. J Biol Chem 248:3582–3592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein -dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith I (1969) Acrylamide gel disc electrophoresis. In: Smith I (ed) Electrophoretic techniques. Academic press, New York, pp 365–515

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weber K, Osborn M (1969) The reliability of molecular weight determinations by dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Biol Chem 244:4406–4412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abd-El-Maksoud MA, Khatab TK, Maigali SS, Soliman FM, Hamed AA (2018) Chemistry of phosphorus ylides: part 46—efficient synthesis andbiological evaluation of new phosphorus, sulfur, and selenium pyrazole derivatives. J Heterocycl Chem 55(12):2883–2892. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.3361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65(1–2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gomha SM, Riyadh SM, Mahmmoud EA, Elaasser MM (2015) Synthesis and anticancer activities of thiazoles, 1,3-thiazines, and thiazolidine using chitosan-grafted-poly (vinylpyridine) as basic catalyst. Heterocycles 91(6):1227–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/CHIN.201538150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abo-Ashour MF, Eldehna WM, Nocentini A, Bonardi A, Bua S, Ibrahim HS, Elaasser MM, Kryštof V, Jorda R, Gratteri P, Abou-Seri SM, Supuran CT (2019) 3-Hydrazinoisatin-based benzenesulfonamides as novel carbonic anhydrase inhibitors endowed with anticancer activity: synthesis, in vitro biological evaluation and in silico insights. Eur J Med Chem 184:111768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ighodaro OM, Akinloye OA (2018) First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid 54(4):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.001.

  36. Liu NY, Wang JQ, Zhang ZB, Huang JM, Zhu JY (2017) Unraveling the venom components of an encyrtid endoparasitoid wasp Diversinervus elegans. Toxicon 15(136):15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Teng ZW, Xiong SJ, Xu G, Gan SY, Chen X, Stanley D, Fang Q (2017) Protein discovery: combined transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of venom from the endoparasitoid Cotesia chilonis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Toxins 9(4):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9040135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu NY, Xu ZW, Yan W, Ren XM, Zhang ZQ, Zhu JY (2018) Venomics reveals novel ion transport peptide-likes (ITPLs) from the parasitoid wasp Tetrastichus brontispae. Toxicon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li-E M, Jia L, Ke-Wu L, Yan J, Xiao-Wen L, Xin L (2004) Isolation, purification and characterization of superoxide dismutase from royal jelly of the Italian worker bee. Apis mellifera. Acta Entomologica Sinica 47(2):171–177 (http://www.insect.org.cn/EN/Y2004/V47/I2/171)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yamamoto K, Zhang P, Miake F, Kashige N, Aso Y, Banno Y, Fujii H (2005) Cloning, expression and characterization of theta-class glutathione S-transferase from the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 141(3):340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2005.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee YM, Misra HP, Ayala FJ (1981) Superoxide dismutase in Drosophila melanogaster: biochemical and structural characterization of allozyme variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78(11):7052–7055. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.11.7052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lomate PR, Sangole KP, Sunkar R, Hivrale VK (2015) Superoxide dismutase activities in the midgut of Helicoverpa armigera larvae: identification and biochemical properties of a manganese superoxide dismutase. Insect Physiology 5:13–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAIP.S84053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yao CL, Wang AL, Wang WN, Sun RY (2004) Purification and partial characterization of Mn superoxide dismutase from muscle tissue of the shrimp Macrobrochiumnipponense. Aquaculture 241:621–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng Z, Jiang YH, Miao JL, Wang QF, Zhang BT, Li GY (2006) Purification and characterization of a cold-active iron superoxide dismutase from a psychrophilic bacterium, Marinomonas sp. NJ522. Biotechnol Lett 28:85–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-005-4951-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen JR, Weng CN, Ho TY, Cheng IC, Lai SS (2000) Identification of the copper-zinc superoxide dismutase activity in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Vet Microbiol 73:301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00170-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haddad N, Yuan Q (2005) Purification and some properties of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase from Radix lethospermi seed, kind of Chinese traditional medicine. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 818(2):123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Öztürk-Ürek R, Tarhan L (2001) Purification and characterization of superoxide dismutase from chicken liver. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 128(2):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-4959(00)00300-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Babitha MP, Prakash; H. S. and Shetty, H. S. (2002) Purification and partial characterization of manganese superoxide dismutase from downy mildew resistant pearl millet seedlings inoculated with Sclerospora graminicola. Plant Sci 163:917–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00238-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ken CF, Lee CC, Duan KJ, Lin CT (2005) Unusual stability of manganese superoxide dismutase from a new species, Tatumella ptyseosct : its gene structure, expression and enzyme properties. Protein Expr Purif 40:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2004.10.003

  50. He N, Li Q, Sun D, Ling X (2008) Isolation, purification and characterization of superoxide dismutase from garlic. Biochem Eng J 38:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the National Research Centre, Egypt, Proteome Research Laboratory.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Molecular Biology Department National Research Centre, Protium Research Laboratory, Dokki, Giza, Egypt

    Mohamed M. Abdel-Monsef, Doaa A. Darwish & Mahmoud A. Ibrahim

  2. Agricultural Research Center, Plant Protection Research Institute, Giza, Egypt

    Hind A. Zidan

  3. Microbial Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt

    Ahmed A. Hamed

Authors
  1. Mohamed M. Abdel-Monsef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doaa A. Darwish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hind A. Zidan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed A. Hamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mahmoud A. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MMA and DAD suggested the work point, designed the experiments, performed the experimental part of the work, interpreted the data, and shared in writing the manuscript. HAZ collect venom samples. AAH carried out the microbiological experiments. MAI follows up the study, provided advice throughout the work, and revised the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed M. Abdel-Monsef.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-Monsef, M.M., Darwish, D.A., Zidan, H.A. et al. Characterization, antimicrobial and antitumor activity of superoxide dismutase extracted from Egyptian honeybee venom (Apis mellifera lamarckii). J Genet Eng Biotechnol 21, 21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00470-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00470-4

Keywords

  • Bee venom
  • Superoxide dismutase
  • Purification and characterization
  • Antimicrobial
  • Antitumor