Skip to main content
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Download PDF

In vitro propagation and cytological analysis of Sophora mollis Royle: an endangered medicinal shrub

Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology volume 19, Article number: 40 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sophora mollis Royle (family Fabaceae, subfamily-Papilionaceae) is a multipurpose legume distributed in plains and foothills of the North-West Himalaya to Nepal and is facing high risk of extinction due to habitat loss and exploitation by the local people for its fuel and fodder values. Therefore, the present study was conducted to standardize a micropropagation protocol for Sophora mollis by using shoot tip explants and to study the meiotic chromosome count in the species.

Results

Multiple shoots were induced in shoot tip explants of Sophora mollis in Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with different concentrations of cytokinins alone (BAP, TDZ, and Kinetin) and in combination with varying concentrations of NAA. MS medium supplemented with BAP (8.9 μM) was observed to be the optimal medium for multiple shoot induction and maximum 25.32 shoots per explant was obtained with average length of 4.5 ± 0.8 cm. In vitro developed shoots were transferred onto rooting media supplemented with different concentrations of auxin (IAA, IBA, and NAA). Maximum 86% rooting was observed in half-strength MS medium supplemented with 21.20 μM NAA with an average of 21.26 roots per culture. In vitro raised plantlets were adapted to greenhouse for better acclimatization and 60% plants were successfully transferred to the open environment. Based on the chromosome counts available from the literature and the current study, the species tend to show a basic chromosome number of x = 9.

Conclusion

The micropropagation protocol standardized can be helpful for the ex situ mass multiplication and germplasm conservation of the endangered species. Moreover, the ex situ conservation approach will be helpful in actively bridging the gap between ex situ and in situ approaches through the reintroduction of species in the wild. The cytological studies revealed the basic chromosome number x = 9 of the species.

Background

Sophora mollis (Royle) Baker belongs to family Fabaceae (subfamily-Papilionaceae) is a small deciduous perennial shrub with dense hairy twigs and yellow flowers generally blooms in the month of March to May [1]. It is commonly known as peeli sakina, and distributed to semi-exposed to shaded moist slopes of forest edges in the Western Himalaya at an altitude range of 700-1500 m in India (Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand), Pakistan, Afghanistan, and China [2]. Due to its continuous exploitation from wild habitats by the local people to fulfill their needs, embark it into endangered category as per its conservation status [3].

Previous studies revealed various pharmacological and therapeutic properties of this genera and extensively being used in traditional Chinese drugs since time immemorial. Genus Sophora is a source of more than 300 compounds such as quinolizidine alkaloids (matrine and oxymatrine) and flavonoids (prenylated and isoprenylated flavonoids). Phytochemical constituent of genus Sophora is medicinally used as anti-cancerous, anti-asthmatic, anti-neoplastic, anti-microbial, anti-pyretic, cardiotonic, anti-inflammatory, diuretic, skin diseases like eczema, colitis, and psoriasis. Besides their curative properties they also have antioxidant properties [4]. Sophora mollis is also a rich source of phytochemical constituents and eight chemical compounds, viz., (E)-phytyl epoxide, 7,11,15-trimethyl-3-methylenehexadecane-1,2-diol, loliolide, scopoletin, hexacosanol, octacosanol, β-sitosterol, and daucosterol have been isolated from the aerial part of it [5].

S. mollis is mainly propagated through seeds and root suckers in the wild but regular cutting of the species for fodder purpose has resulted into poor seed setting and has badly affected the regeneration potential of the species in wild. This might be one of the probable reasons of its population shrinkage from the wild and it is further compounded by various other factors such as habitat degradation, forest fire, and climate change. To overcome the challenges of conventional propagation methods, new advance method of micropropagation is considered as an effective tool for ex situ conservation and its perpetuation in the wild. In vitro morphogenesis seems to be difficult to achieve in the Papilionaceae but with few exceptions; micropropagation protocol were successfully standardized for the Robinia pseudoacacia [6], Pterocarpus indicus [7], and Cassia senna [8], species phylogenetically close to Sophora. In vitro studies were also conducted in some species of Sophora, viz., S. toromiro [9], S. tonkinensis [10], and S. flavescens [11] and in vitro propagation protocol were successfully standardized for them. But best of our knowledge, there is not even a single study on in vitro propagation of S. mollis.

S. mollis has a scattered distribution over a wide range from Central Asia to foothills of Western Himalayas and beyond. However, chromosome counts are available from very few regions. Previously meiotic chromosome number (n = 9) has been reported in S. mollis from India [12, 13], Iran [14,15,16], and Russia [17]. Bir and Kumari [12] reported 2n = 18 in the species from Sangam, Panchmari, Madhya Pradesh, India, with normal meiotic behavior. Noori et al. [15] worked out mitotic chromosome count in the species (2n = 18) with mean chromosome size range between 1.40-2.40 μm. Advance genomic studies in the genus showed that the species existed at diploid (2x) level with 2.04 pg genomic size 2C DNA amount [16]. The basic chromosome number varies in the genus Sophora which is a paraphyletic group of species having basic chromosome numbers, i.e., x = 7, 8, 9, 11, 14 [15].

Therefore, this study was undertaken to develop an efficient micro-propagation protocol for the mass multiplication of S. mollis, cytological analysis of the species and to rehabilitate the species in the wild.

Methods

Initiation of aseptic culture and shoot induction

The young terminal shoot tip explants (2.0-3.5 cm) of S. mollis were collected from the plants conserved in the Experimental Botanical Garden and identified with the help of herbarium specimen (BSD 123495) for the further in vitro and cytological studies. Explants were initially washed under running tap water for 30 min followed by Tween-20 (Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) to remove dirt particles, traces of soil, and followed by fungicide treatment (1% bavistin) for disinfection of the explants for 30 min. Thereafter, explants were disinfected with different surface sterilizing agents, i.e., ethanol (70%), sodium hypochlorite (6%) (Merck & Co., USA) and mercuric chloride (0.1%) (Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) with different time duration of 2, 5, and 8 min, respectively. After each treatment, explants were washed thrice with sterilized double distilled water. Properly disinfected shoot tip explants were further used for the organogenesis experiments. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.7 before autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min and then sterilized shoot tip explants were inoculated onto basal MS medium [18] supplemented with agar (6%), sucrose (30 g l−1), and various PGRs alone or in combinations. Cultures were maintained in the culture room at 24±2 °C, under a 16/8 h light and dark cycle with a light intensity of 47.29 μmol m−2 s−1 provided by white fluorescent PAR lights (40 W; Wipro, India). All the plant growth regulators (PGRs) applied was procured from Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India, and glass wares used (conical flask: Borosil 4980, 250 ml, and 85×140 mm; culture tubes: 38×200 ml) were from Borosil, India.

Explants (size, 1.5-2.0 cm) were inoculated onto basal MS medium (control) and MS medium augmented with different concentrations of cytokinins, viz., 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) (2.2 to 11.1 μM), N-phenyl-N′-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-yl urea (thidiazuron/TDZ) (2.27 to 6.8 μM), and kinetin (2.32 to 9.3 μM). Subsequently, the optimal concentration of BAP (8.9 μM), TDZ (4.54 μM), and kinetin (6.9 μM) were further tested in combination with different concentrations of naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) (0.53-2.65 μM) to observe the synergistic effect of both the PGRs on shoot induction and proliferation.

After shoot initiation, shoot proliferation was performed in MS medium supplemented with BAP (8.9 μM) having 0.5% agar (Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India). Shoot proliferation cultures were sub-cultured at regular interval of 3 weeks. Shoot multiplication rate was calculated on the basis of percentage of explants with positive response, number of total shoots per explant and shoot height after 8 weeks of incubation.

Root induction

In vitro developed single shoots/shoot cluster of 2-3 cm length were inoculated onto MS and modified MS medium (half strength and quarter-strength). Further, half-strength MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of auxins, viz., indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (5.71, 11.42, 17.13, and 22.84 μM), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) (4.9, 7.36, 9.8, 12.26, and 14.7 μM), and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) (5.3, 10.60, 15.90, 21.20, and 23.85 μM) were used for the root development. Cultures were incubated under the same conditions as above and rooting percentage, number of roots and root length were recorded after 6 weeks of incubation.

All the experiments were conducted in triplicates and each set of experiment was carried out with 20 explants. Analysis of variance and mean separation was carried out using Duncan’s multiple range tests (DMRT) utilizing the SPS software.

Hardening and transplantation

Plantlets with properly developed roots were taken out from the culture tubes/flasks after 6-weeks of incubation and washed gently under running tap water to detach the traces of the medium from the roots. Initially to optimize the hardening conditions, the regenerated plantlets were transferred into two set of plastic cups (8×7 cm), one set was filled with a mixture of soil and sand in equal ratio (w/v) while another set was containing only sand. All the plantlets were maintained in the green house at 25±2 °C. Initially to maintain the humidity, plants were covered with transparent polythene sheet and removed after 1 week. After 2 months, plantlets were shifted to nursery black polybags (4.5×8 inch) containing soil and maintained in the poly house. Plantlets were provided half-strength modified Hoagland solution [19] at 3 days interval. In order to acclimatize plants to field conditions, plantlets were transferred to poly bags containing compost enriched soil after 4 weeks and maintained in the open.

Meiotic studies

For chromosome counts and male meiosis, suitable-sized floral buds were fixed in Carnoy’s fluid (absolute alcohol: chloroform: glacial acetic acid in a ratio of 6:3:1 (v/v)). Samples (BSD 123495) for the study were collected from the plant conserved in the Experimental Botanical Garden. Young and emerging anthers from unopened buds were squashed in 1% acetocarmine and meiotic preparations were made. In each case, 50-100 meiocytes were observed under light microscope at different stages of meiosis for chromosome counts and detailed meiotic course. For microsporogenesis, 100-200 sporads were analyzed in each case. Pollen fertility was assessed through stainability tests by crushing the completely developed anthers in glycerol-acetocarmine mixture (1:1). Well-filled pollen grains with totally stained cytoplasm and nuclei were counted as fertile whereas shriveled and those with stainless/incompletely stained cytoplasm were noted as sterile. Photomicrographs of meiocytes, sporads, and pollen grains were taken from temporary preparations using Nikon microscope fitted with a digital camera.

Results

Shoot induction and proliferation

The excised shoot tip explants inoculated onto the shoot initiation basal MS medium (control) did not show any morphogenic response. When basal media was enriched with BAP (2.2 to 11.1 μM), TDZ (2.27 to 6.8 μM), and kinetin (2.32 to 9.3 μM), a significant increase was observed in shoot formation percentage and maximum 96.27% shoot development was observed in BAP substituted medium followed by TDZ (78.69%) and kinetin (76.78%) (Table 1). Since BAP (8.9 μM), TDZ (4.54 μM), and kinetin (6.9 μM) yielded the maximum shoot proliferation rate in the MS medium, they were further tested in combination with various concentrations of NAA (0.53-2.65 μM). But no significant difference was observed in the shoot proliferation rate, besides shoot formation, callusing was also observed and consequently a reduction in the number of shoots. Based on all the experiments, MS medium supplemented with 8.9 μM BAP was considered optimal for the shoot development and a maximum of 96.27% shoot formation was achieved with 25.32 mean shoot number per culture and 4.5 cm shoot length (Fig. 1a-c).

Table 1 Effect of cytokinins and NAA on shoot development from shoot tip explants of S. mollis inoculated onto MS medium after 8 weeks of culture
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Micropropagation of Sophora mollis. a Initiation of shoots from shoot tip explants inoculated onto MS medium enriched with BAP (8.9 μM L−1) after 14 days of incubation, (b and c) proliferation of shoots in shoot proliferation medium, (d, e, and f) root induction in half-strength MS medium augmented with NAA (21.20 μM L−1) after 6 weeks of incubation, (g) properly rooted plantlets transferred to plastic cups containing sand, (h) fully acclimatized plants transferred to poly bags containing soil after 4 months of transfer

Full size image

Root induction

Tufts of healthy shoots (4.0 cm height) were shifted for the root induction onto basal MS and modified MS medium (half and quarter strength). Shoots transferred to basal MS medium did not yield any rooting response, while 10.14 and 7.32% rooting was observed in the half and quarter-strength MS medium, respectively. Since half-strength MS medium yielded better rooting response, further experiments were conducted in the half-strength MS medium. By incorporation of IBA (4.9-14.7 μM), NAA (5.3-23.85 μM) and IAA (5.71-22.84 μM) into half-strength MS medium, a significant increase was observed in the rooting percentage. Maximum rooting rates of 86.3, 39.45, and 37.29% were observed in NAA, IBA, and IAA augmented half-strength MS medium (Table 2). The half-strength MS medium, augmented with NAA (21.2 μM) was found to be the optimal for root development in S. mollis and 86.3% rooting was achieved with average 21.26 numbers of roots per shoot after 6-weeks of incubation (Fig. 1d-f).

Table 2 Effect of auxins on root induction in in vitro regenerated shoots of S. mollis in half-strength MS medium after 6 weeks of culture
Full size table

Hardening and transplantation

To optimize the hardening conditions, initially twenty plantlets each, with well-developed roots, were shifted to plastic cups containing a mixture of soil and sand in 1:1 ratio (w/v) and sand only (Fig. 1g). All the plantlets were kept inside the greenhouse to adapt to open environment for 1 month. Plantlets shifted to sand responded better and after 2 months plants were shifted to nursery black poly bags containing compost enriched soil in the greenhouse. Fully acclimatized plants were finally transferred to the open environment with 60% success (Fig. 1h), and plants were also transferred to suitable wild habitats under the habitat rehabilitation and species recovery program.

Meiotic studies

Meiotic chromosome number of n = 9 was determined in S. mollis by the presence of 9:9 chromosomes distributions at metaphase-II (Fig. 2a). In very few instances, lagging chromosomes and non-disjunction of chromatin material was observed (Fig. 2b, c). Majority of the pollen mother cells showed normal pairing of chromosomes and equal segregation at anaphase. Consequently, hundred percent pollen fertility was recorded (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chromosomal study in Sophora mollis. a A pollen mother cell showing n=9 at metaphase-II, (b) lagging of chromosome at anaphase-I (arrowed), (c) non-disjunction of chromatin material at anaphase-I (arrowed), (d) apparently fertile/stained pollen grains. Scale =10 μm

Full size image

Discussion

S. mollis is a small deciduous perennial shrub with distinct therapeutic properties and used in traditional Chinese drugs since time immemorial. The unsustainable overexploitation has resulted into the dwindling population size of species in the wild. Thus, plant propagation through tissue culture is recognized as a viable alternative for the multiplication, conservation, and utilization of threatened taxa [20, 21]. Reintroduction of plants into their native environment, under the species recovery and habitat rehabilitation programs, is becoming an increasingly utilized strategy in threatened plant conservation and also proven successful in a variety of species [22, 23].

The in vitro study on S. mollis revealed that the MS medium enriched with 8.9 μM BAP was observed to be optimal for the development of shoots and maximum 96.27% shoot formation was achieved with 25.32 ± 0.83 mean shoot number per culture and 4.5 ± 0.8 cm shoot length, respectively. The current finding is in accordance to the previous reports on Sophora tonkinensis [24] in which shoot development was observed in MS medium fortified with 2ip (2.0 μM l−1) and 5.0 shoots per culture was obtained. While contrary to this, shoot development was also achieved in combination of BAP and auxin (NAA, IBA, and IAA) in S. tonkinensis [10], S. flavescens [11] and S. toromiro [9]. Explants inoculated onto MS medium enriched with TDZ and NAA, exhibit hyperhydricity in shoots, thus reducing the total shoot number, and similar phenomenon was also reported in S. flavescens [11]. Among all the cytokinins used, BAP alone proved to be the most optimal and maximum shoot formation (25.32) was achieved.

Half-strength MS medium augmented with NAA (21.2 μM) was found to be the optimal for root development in S. mollis. Maximum 21.26 ± 1.2 roots per shoot were observed with average root length of 4.5 cm after 6-weeks of incubation. NAA was also the most appropriate for root induction in S. flavescens [11]. All the in vitro raised plantlets were successfully hardened with 60% of success and were finally transferred to the open environment. Well established plants planted to the wild habitat, under the Habitat Rehabilitation and Species Recovery Program, were also growing successfully and 80% survival rate was reported after 6 months of transfer.

The meiotic chromosome analysis of S. mollis exhibit a basic chromosome number of x = 9, which is in accordance to previous studies on the species [12,13,14,15, 17]. This is the first report of chromosome count in the species from Indian Himalayan region. The species occurred at diploid level (2x = 18, with base chromosome number x = 9) as per the current study. Further, the meiotic course in the species was found to be normal with hundred percent pollen fertility.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current investigation first time describes an efficient and reproducible micropropagation protocol for the Sophora mollis, a threatened multipurpose species of the North-West Himalaya. This micropropagation system assured effective establishment, mass multiplication, and could offer an in vitro strategy for the ex situ conservation of this threatened shrub. This is the first report of chromosome count in S. mollis from Indian Himalayan region and revealed the basic chromosome number x = 9.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

BAP:

6-Benzylaminopurine

NAA:

Naphthalene acetic acid

IBA:

Indole butyric acid

IAA:

Indole acetic acid

TDZ:

N-Phenyl-N0-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-urea or thidiazuron

References

  1. Manzoor M, Manzoor M, Bibi S, Zaibunisa (2013) Antibacterial activity of Sophora mollis against Escherichia coli and phytochemical tests of plant. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 8(7):525–530

    Google Scholar 

  2. Srivastava A, Srivastava SK, Dangwal LR (2016) Specific habitat requirement and ex-situ conservation of some threatened plant species of Western Himalaya. Int J Environ Biodivers 7(4):179–184

  3. Mamgain SK (1999) Phenological observation and conservation of Sophora mollis Royle (Papilionaceae) an endangered multi-purpose legume of North-West Himalaya. Taiwania 44(1):137–144

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krishna PM, Rao KNV, Sandhya S, Banji D (2012) A review on phytochemical, ethnomedical and pharmacological studies on genus Sophora, Fabaceae. Brazilian J Pharmacognosy 22(5):1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2012005000043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fei DQ, Arfan M, Rafiq J, Gao K (2009) Chemical constituent from the aerial parts of Sophora mollis. Chem Nat Compounds 45(6):896–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-010-9477-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown CL, Sommer HE (1982) Vegetative propagation of dicotyledonous trees. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Tissue Culture in Forestry, Forestry Sciences, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3538-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao AN, Lee SK (1982) Importance of tissue culture in tree propagation. In: Fujiwara A (ed) Proc. 5th Intl. Cong. Plant Tissue & Cell Culture. Maruzen Co., Tokyo, pp 715–718

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rai PP, Turtle TD, Greenmith SL (1974) Anthracene derivatives in tissue culture of Cassia senna L. J Pharm Pharmacol 26(9):722–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1974.tb09356.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iturriaga L, Jordan M, Roveraro C, Goreux A (1994) In vitro culture of Sophora toromiro (Papilionaceae), an endangered species. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 37(2):201–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043617

  10. Kun-Hua W, Lin-Xuan L, Yong-Cai H, Mei-Ying W, Cui J-HM (2013) Tissue culture of Sophora tonkinensis Gapnep. and its quality evaluation. Pharmacogn Mag 9(36):323–330. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1296.117828

  11. Zhao DL, Guo GQ, Wang XY, Zheng GC (2003) In vitro micropropagation of a medicinal plant species Sophora flavescens. Biol Plant 47:117–120

  12. Bir SS, Kumari S (1973) In IOPB chromosome number reports XLI. Taxon 22:459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumari S, Bir SS (1990) Karyomorphological evolution in Papilionaceae. J Cytol Genetics 25:173–219

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aryavand A (1975) Contribution a l’etude cytotaxonomique de quelques angiospermes de l’Iran (Contribution to the cytotaxonomic study of some angiosperms from Iran). Botaniska Notiser 128:299–311

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noori M, Simmonds MSJ, Ingrouille M (2001) Chromosome studies of Iranian members of tribe Sophoreae (family Leguminosae). J Sci Islamic Republic Iran 12:111–116

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ohri D, Bhargava A, Chatterjee A (2004) Nuclear DNA amounts in 112 species of tropical hardwoods - New estimates. Plant Biol 6(5):555–561. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-821235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zemskova EA (1990) In: Takhtajan A (ed) Numeri Chromosomatum Magnoliophytorum Florae URSS, Aceraceae - Menyanthaceae. Leninopoli, Nauka

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Epstein E (1972) Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. John Wiley, New York, p 412

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wochok ZS (1981) The role of tissue culture in preserving threatened and endangered plant species. Biol Conserv 20(2):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(81)90019-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fay MF (1994) In what situations is in vitro culture appropriate to plant conservations? Biodivers Conserv 3(2):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maunder M (1992) Plant reintroduction: an overview. Biodivers Conserv 1:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart SL (2008) Orchid reintroduction in the United States: a minireview. NANOJ 14:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jana S, Sivanesar JBR (2013) Effects of cytokinins on in vitro multiplication of Sophora tonkinensis. Asian Pacific J Trop Biomed 3(7):549–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60111-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Head of office, Botanical Survey of India, Northern Regional Centre, Dehradun, for providing the necessary facilities. Authors are also thankful to G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development (GBPNIHESD) under the National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS) (GBPNI/NMHS-2017-18/LG-03/570; dated-26/02/2018) for the financial assistance.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India, under the National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Botanical Survey of India, Northern Regional Centre, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248195, India

    Aakriti Bhandari, Harminder Singh, Amber Srivastava, Puneet Kumar & G. S. Panwar

  2. Botanical Survey of India, Eastern Regional Centre, Shillong, Meghalaya, 793003, India

    Harminder Singh

  3. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    A. A. Mao

Authors
  1. Aakriti Bhandari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harminder Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amber Srivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Puneet Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. S. Panwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. A. Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AB conducted the in vitro experiments, AS surveyed the locality of the species in the wild and collected the explant material, HS and PK conducted the cytological studies, GSP recorded the data of tissue culture experiments and prepared the final manuscript and AAM has supervised the overall work. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Panwar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhandari, A., Singh, H., Srivastava, A. et al. In vitro propagation and cytological analysis of Sophora mollis Royle: an endangered medicinal shrub. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19, 40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00140-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00140-3

Keywords