Skip to main content

Nanoparticles induce genetic, biochemical, and ultrastructure variations in Salvadora persica callus

Abstract

Background

Salvadora persica is an endangered medicinal plant due to difficulties in its traditional propagation. It is rich in bioactive compounds that possess many pharmaceutical, antimicrobial activities and widely used in folk medicine. The current study aims at in vitro propagation of Salvadora persica and the application of different nanoparticles (NPs) to induce the synthesis of bioactive and secondary metabolites within the plant. The cellular and genetic responses to the application of different NPs were evaluated.

Results

The impact of nanoparticles NPs (ZnO, SiO2, and Fe3O4) on callus growth of Salvadora persica and the production of its active constituent benzyl isothiocyanate was examined, regarding some oxidative stress markers, antioxidant enzymes, and genetic variabilities. An encouraging impact of 0.5 mg/l ZnO NPs on benzyl isothiocyanate production was shown reaching up to 0.905 mg/g callus fresh weight in comparison to 0.539 mg/g in control callus. This was associated with decreasing hydrogen peroxide content and increasing superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities. The deposition of the NPs on cellular organelles was detected using a transmission microscope. Fifteen Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) primers detected an overall, 79.1% polymorphism among different treatments. A reduction in genomic DNA template stability (GTS) was made and was more pronounced in higher doses of different NPs.

Conclusion

This study is a stepping stone in developing a productive protocol for in vitro production of benzyl isothiocyanate from Salvadora persica using NPs as a valuable anticancer compound.

Background

Nanotechnology has been extensively employed in plant biotechnology and has monumental applications. In agriculture, it is related to nutrient utilization, plant germination, plant development, and stress tolerance. The application of nanoparticles (NPs) to induce the synthesis of bioactive secondary metabolites from their natural sources is a rising trend. Their potential tiny size, wide surface area, reactivity, and high affinity to penetrate the plasma membrane make them ideal for biological applications, taking into consideration their various effects on living cells [1]. However, the role of NPs in plant secondary metabolism regarding callus culture continues to be obscure [2]. Several studies reported the positive influence of NP application on plant growth and development, particularly at low concentrations. However, a degree of phytotoxic impact of NPs, particularly at high concentrations, was conjointly reportable. A promotive effect on Salvadora persica callus growth and benzyl isothiocyanate accumulation was observed after callus exposure to TiO2 and CuO NPs at concentrations of 0.5–2 mg/l [1]. Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh seedlings treated with 200 and 300 mg/l ZnO NPs demonstrate reduced, growth, chlorophyll content, and rates of photosynthesis [2]. A similar impact was discovered in Oryza sativa treated with 1000 mg/l CuO NPs [3]. Callus growth of rapeseed was significantly retarded by 25, 50, and 100 mg/l ZnO NPs, while 10 mg/l significantly induce callus growth [4].

The tissue culture technique is widely used for sustainable conservation and utilization of valuable secondary metabolites in rare and endangered medicinal plants, particularly those with difficulties in their traditional propagation, such as Salvadora persica L. [5]. Salvadora persica is commonly known as Meswak (toothbrush) and belongs to the family Salvadoraceae. Traditionally, the plant is employed in folk medicine for oral hygiene, dental care, cough, asthma, scurvy, rheumatism, ulcers, and piles curing. Salvadora persica contains several bioactive molecules, such as volatile oils, flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and saponins in different parts of the plant. These constituents have many pharmacological activities and antimicrobial properties [6]. Salvadora persica aqueous root extract exhibits cytotoxicity on oral cancer cells: oral epithelial dysplasia (DOK) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (PE/CA-PJ15) [7]. Also, the cytotoxicity of Salvadora persica sticks and bark extracts against HepG2, MCF7, A549, and HCT116 cancer cells was investigated. Cytotoxic properties of the plant extract were investigated against the breast MCF7, ovary A2780, and colon HT29 cells. The fruit extract of Salvadora persica was selective against the ovarian and colon cancer cells [8]. Besides the various properties of Salvadora persica, ZnO NPs can be synthesized using the root extract of the plant from its precursor, zinc acetate dihydrate. The existing volatiles, essential oils, alkaloids, and acids in the root extract help in ZnO NP fabrication. These NPs can be used in medical, photochemical, biosensors, and electrical applications [9].

Salvadora persica is a cross-pollinated tree with a high degree of genetic variability and low seed formation and viability (30%) and needs 7–9 years for complete maturation. All of these restrict its propagation. In vitro propagation of Slavadora persica offers an associate economical route for the production of virus-free plantlets in a faster time [10].

Salvadora persica is a reliable natural supply for extracting benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) that is believed to be promising within the development of anticancer medications. Recently, BITC found to inhibit prostate cancer [11], lung cancer [12], oral cancer [13], and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma [14].

Nanoparticle utilization by plant cells can cause genetic variations that are species, NP size, type, and concentration-dependent. Very little is thought concerning the genotoxicity of NPs in plants; therefore, far more effort should be done for evaluating plant genetic response [15]. To achieve this goal, several DNA-based techniques, such as Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) and Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) techniques, have been with efficiency accustomed to assess the genotoxic impact of NPs on various plant species [16,17,18]. The generation of ISSR markers makes use of microsatellite sequences that are highly variable and ubiquitously distributed across the genome. All these make ISSR an ideal genetic marker for genetic variation [19, 20], DNA fingerprinting [21], and genotoxicity analysis [18].

The present study was aimed toward evaluating the potential impact of various concentrations of three NPs; Fe3O4, SiO2, and ZnO on Salvadora persica callus. The evaluation includes callus biomass, BITC production, antioxidant enzyme activities, cellular response, and genetic variations.

Methods

Salvadora persica callus induction and nanoparticles treatment

Salvadora persica shoots bearing eight to ten nodes with terminal buds were excised from 30-day-old uniform plants derived from seeds obtained from the Red Sea coastal region. Experiments were carried out at the Desert Research Center (DRC), Cairo, Egypt. The plant was identified by Dr. Omran Ghaly, Head of Plant Taxonomy Unit, Desert Research Center, Egypt, given the voucher number CAIH-1008-R, and the voucher specimen was deposited in the Herbarium of Desert Research Center (CAIH).

Stem internodal segment explants were cut and washed under running tap water for 15 min with 1% of a commercial detergent (Pril). Surface sterilization of the explants in a laminar airflow hood (Holten LaminAir HVR 2448, USA) by submerging the explants in 30% of commercial bleach (Clorox containing 5.25% sodium hypochlorite) for 10 min, followed by dipping in 0.1% (w/v) mercuric chloride (HgCl2) for 45 s. Finally, explants were thoroughly rinsed five times with sterilized distilled water.

Salvadora persica callus was induced from stem internodal segments on MS medium [22] (Duchefa, Haarlem, the Netherlands), supplemented with 3% (w v-1) sucrose, 1 mg/l 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and 1 mg/l kinetin (kn) (Sigma Cell Culture, min. 90%, St. Louis, USA) according to Hegazi et al. [23]. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.7–5.8 and solidified with 0.25% (w v-1) phytagel (Duchefa, Haarlem, the Netherlands), before autoclaving at a pressure of 1.06 kg cm-2 and 121 °C for 15 min. Four explants were cultured per jar, and the cultures were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C in the darkness and sub-cultured every 3 weeks.

Pure preparation (99%) of ZnO, SiO2, or Fe3O4 nanopowder, 25 to 55 nm in size, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). The NPs were dissolved in sterilized MS medium to final concentrations of 0.5 or 2 mg/l of ZnO, SiO2, or Fe3O4. Callus fresh weight (CFW) was recorded after 30 and 45 days of incubation.

Extraction and HPLC analysis of benzyl isothiocyanate

Benzyl isothiocyanate content was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Dionex Ultimate 3000 equipped) according to Kiddle et al. [24]. Briefly, 3 g of 30- or 45-day NP-treated or untreated callus were homogenized with 5 ml of methanol and deionized water 70: 30 (v/v) at 70 oC for 30 min. The extracts were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatants were filtered with a 0.45-mm membrane filter. The HPLC was performed by UV-VIS detector at 246 nm wavelength, an injection volume of 20 μl at 40 °C, C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm), mobile phase acetonitrile and deionized water (60: 40 v/v), and flow rate of 1 ml/min. Four standard concentrations of BITC (2000, 1000, 500, and 250 mg/l) (Sigma-Aldrich Germany) were separately analyzed by HPLC. The standard curve was plotted between concentration and peak area, and the best line was chosen. Benzyl isothiocyanate content in callus extracts, expressed as mg/g CFW, was calculated by using the equation of the standard curve.

$$ Y=12.125X+0.0207 $$

Oxidative stress

Malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) contents were determined as markers for oxidative stress. Also, the activity of some reactive oxygen species scavenging enzymes; superoxide dismutase and peroxidase were detected in 45-days-old NP-treated callus in comparison to control.

Malondialdehyde content

Malondialdehyde (MDA) level was determined according to Heath and Packer [23]. Three grams of fresh weight of callus of NP treatments and the control treatment were homogenized in 1 ml of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (w/v) and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. Two ml of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reagent was added to 0.5 ml of the supernatant. The mixture was heated at 95 oC for 15 min and cooled immediately. MDA-TBA complex concentration was determined spectrophotometrically (Spectronic Genesys. 5) at 532 nm and corrected by subtracting the absorbance at 600 nm and converted to μmol/g CFW (calculated from MDA standard curve).

Hydrogen peroxide content

Hydrogen peroxide content was determined according to Junglee et al. [25]. Three grams of fresh weight of NP-treated and control callus were homogenized in 1 ml 0.1% TCA (w/v), then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. Half milliliter of each supernatant was added to 0.5 ml of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 1 ml of 1 M KI. The absorbance was measured at 390 nm spectrophotometer (Spectronic Genesys. 5). The content of H2O2 in Salvadora persica callus was converted from mg/l (calculated from H2O2 standard curve) to μmol/g CFW.

Antioxidant enzymes

Three grams of fresh weight of Salvadora persica callus were homogenized in 2 ml extraction buffer (0.61 g Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 14 mM β-mercaptoethanol 0.1% (v/v), followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 min at 2 oC. Protein concentration was measured in each extract using Bradford methods (Bio-Rad, CA), and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a standard. Thirty micrograms of protein extract were mixed with non-reducing sample loading buffer (62.2 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1% (w/v) bromophenol blue without SDS) and resolved on 10% polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, superoxide dismutases (SOD) activity was visualized in native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) by incubating the gel in 0.2 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 4% riboflavin, 4% EDTA, and 20% nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) for 40 min in dark [26]. The SOD activity appeared as a zone of clearance on a blue background. Peroxidase activity (POD) was visualized in native PAGE by staining the gels in 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 4.8) containing 3% H2O2 and 4% 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in 50% methanol at room temperature, till the yellow color appeared [27]. Band intensities were quantified using Quantity One software.

Genetic variation and ISSR profiling

The ISSR analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of NPs on genetic contents of 45-day-old Salvadora persica callus treated with 0.5 or 2 mg/l of Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO NPs in comparison to non-treated callus; control. The total genomic DNA was isolated from all samples according to the developed protocol of Porebski et al. [28] for plants containing high polysaccharides [28]. For ISSR analysis, the polymerase chain reaction was carried out in Biometra thermal cycler using primers in 50-μl reaction volume. The PCR reaction mixture included the following: 30 ng of DNA, 0.5 U of Red Hot Taq polymerase (AB-gene House, UK), and 1X Taq polymerase buffer (AB-gene House, UK), 10 mM dNTPs, 50 mM MgCl2, and 10 μM of each primer. The PCR profile starts with 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 38 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing temperature as shown in Table 4 for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. A final extension at 72 °C for 10 min was included. 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel in 1X TAE buffer containing 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide was used to resolve the PCR products. Ethidium bromide-stained gel was visualized and image captured using UV-transilluminator. The bands (ISSR markers) were scored using Quantity One software version 4.6.2.70. The band occurrence was scored as binary data; 1 for the presence and 0 for the absence. The number of unique, polymorphic, and monomorphic bands and the percentage of polymorphism for each primer and each treatment were calculated. GeneRuler 1 kb DNA ladder (Thermo scientific #SM1331) was used to determine the size of the ISSR fragments.

The percent of genomic template stability (% of GTS) was calculated according to the following formula:

$$ \%\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{GTS}=\left(1-\frac{a}{n}\right)x100 $$

where a is the average number of changes in each DNA profile of each treatment and n is the number of total bands in control samples [16].

Transmission electron microscopy

Control and NP-treated Salvadora persica callus cells were imaged by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to observe the NP deposition in the callus cells. Samples were washed and fixed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 3% glutaraldehyde for 2 h at room temperature, then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetraoxide for another 2 h at room temperature. Next, the samples were immersed in gradient ethanol for dehydration from 10 to 90% for 15 min in each alcohol dilution and finally dehydrated with absolute ethanol for 30 min. The samples were infiltrated with epoxy resin and acetone through a graded series till in pure resin. Ultrathin sections were collected on former-coated copper grids. Sections were then double-stained in uranyl acetate, followed by lead citrate. Stained ultrathin sections of samples were examined with a JEOL 1010 TEM at 70 kV [29].

Experimental design and statistical analysis

Experiments were subjected to a completely randomized design. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze data using Duncan’s multiple range test [30] as modified by [31] to compare the means at p < 0.05.

Results

Effect of nanoparticles on callus biomass

The results of the present study showed that the treatment of Salvadora persica callus with different concentrations of ZnO, SiO2, and Fe3O4 NPs had positive effects compared with control treatment, during the two growth stages. The increase in callus fresh weight was the highest in callus treated with 2 mg/l of ZnO NPs or SiO2 NPs for 45 days, reached up to 256 and 250% increase over the control callus, respectively as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Effect of nanoparticles on fresh weight of Salvadora persica callus after 30 and 45 days of treatment

Effect of nanoparticles on benzyl isothiocyanate content

Benzyl isothiocyanate content in NP treated and untreated callus for 30 and 45 days was detected at 246 nm based on UV–Visible spectral data. The HPLC profile of BITC standard showed the presence of one peak with a retention time of 2.767 min. HPLC analysis showed that the maximum accumulation of BITC (~0.91 mg/g) was recorded at 0.5 mg/l ZnO NP callus treatment for 45 days, comparing to all applied NPs. Benzyl isothiocyanate content slightly increased in callus treated with 2 mg/l of SiO2 or Fe3O4 NPs for 45 days compared with control as illustrated in Table 2.

Table 2 Effect of nanoparticles on benzyl isothiocyanate content in Salvadora persica callus after 30 and 45 days of treatment

Effect of nanoparticles on oxidative stress

Altered malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide levels in nanoparticle-treated callus

To evaluate the oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation induced by ZnO, SiO2, and Fe3O4 NP treatments in Salvadora persica callus after 45 days, the levels of MDA and H2O2 in callus homogenate were estimated. Table 3 shows a significant increase of MDA levels after treatment with Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO NPs with different concentrations, compared with the control, except 0.5 mg/l ZnO NPs that had a non-significant effect on MDA, whereas callus treated with all NP treatments recorded a significant decrease in H2O2 level, except for 2.0 mg/l Fe3O4 NP treatment.

Table 3 Effect of nanoparticles on MDA and H2O2 levels in Salvadora persica callus after 45 days of treatment

Altered superoxide dismutases and peroxidase activities in nanoparticle-treated callus

The SOD and POD activities were determined by in-gel assays using proteins isolated from Salvadora persica callus treated with Fe3O4, SiO2, and ZnO NPs. Five main bands showing SOD activity were detected, one band for Mn SOD, two bands showing FeSOD activity (FeSODI and FeSODII), and two bands showing Cu/ZnSOD activity (Cu/ZnSODI and Cu/ZnSODII). No consistent differences were observed in MnSOD, but different isoforms of FeSOD activity between control and NP-treated callus were observed, although an increase in the activity of Cu/ZnSOD isoforms was detected in NP-treated callus vs. control (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Activity of SOD isoforms in 45 days old Salvadora persica callus treated with Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles and the control. The SOD activity was represented as relative band intensities of Cu/ZnSODI and Cu/ZnSODII

Three main bands showing different POD isoform (POD1-POD2 and POD3) activity were detected. An increase in all POD isoforms in NP-treated callus compared with control was detected, in which POD isoform activity in callus treated with Fe3O4 and SiO2 NPs was higher than that of ZnO NPs treatments (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Activity of POD isoforms in 45 days old Salvadora persica callus treated with Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles and the control. The POD activity was represented as relative band intensities of PODI, PODII, and PODIII

Genetic variation analysis induced by nanoparticles

Analysis of ISSR was applied to investigate the NP effect on the genetic contents of 45-day-old Salvadora persica callus subjected to different treatments of NPs. Fifteen ISSR primers were successfully detected 191 alleles among different treatments. The overall primers revealed 151 polymorphic markers representing 79.1% of polymorphism. The most reproducible one was UBC811 that scored 23 markers. Nevertheless, UBC826 scored 100% of polymorphism, while UBC862 and UBC824 scored the lowest percentage of 37.5% polymorphism (Table 4 and Fig. 3).

Table 4 List of selected ISSR primers and their codes, sequences, annealing temperature, the number of amplified markers, and percentage of polymorphism for each primer in Salvadora persica samples treated with Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles and their controls
Fig. 3
figure3

ISSR profiles produced from Salvadora persica callus. The ISSR profile produced in 45-day-old callus treated with 0.5 and 2 mg/l of Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles and their controls (C). The ISSR profile produced using eight different primers as labeled on each gel image. M: 1 kb DNA ladder

The 2 mg/l dose of both SiO2 and ZnO NPs produced the highest percentage of unique markers of 12 and 33%, respectively. On the contrary, the lowest doses of the same NPs generated only one and no specific markers, respectively (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Percentage of polymorphic and unique ISSR markers in Salvadora persica callus in 0.5 and 2 mg/l of Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO-treated callus of 45 days old and the control

Diversity in the ISSR profile generated by different concentrations of each NP was calculated as a quantitative measure reflecting the percentage of genomic template stability (GTS) for each treatment (Fig. 5). The percentage of GTS was generally decreased in all treatments. The highest GTS was 85.1% for 0.5 mg/l Fe3O4, while the lowest was 61.7% for 2 mg/l ZnO treatment.

Fig. 5
figure5

Comparison of genomic DNA template stability (GTS) in 45-day-old callus treated with 0.5 and 2 mg/l of Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles and the control in Salvadora persica callus

Visualization of nanoparticles in callus by transmission electron microscope

Transmission electron microscope images of the cross-callus sections in Fig. 6 show a normal cellular organization in the control callus section. Images of ZnO NP-treated callus show maintained cell components, with the complete cell membrane and cell wall at 0.5 mg/l ZnO or SiO2 NPs, while 2 mg/l of both NPs showed accumulation of NPs in the plasma membrane. Treatment with 0.5 mg/l of Fe3O4 NPs showed accumulation of NPs inside the mitochondria and plasma membrane, which was more pronounced at 2 mg/l NP treatments, which appeared as dark dots.

Fig. 6
figure6

TEM images of 45-day-old callus of Salvadora persica treated with 0.5 and 2 mg/l of Fe3O4, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles and the control. On each image, the scale bar and the magnification power. Abbreviations on images: CW cell wall, M mitochondria, NP nanoparticle, Nu nucleus, P plasma membrane, V vacuole

Discussion

Nanoparticles are recently used to improve plant growth, yield, and the production of bioactive compounds [16, 32]. In plant cell culture approaches, callus culture was a suitable method for the production of bioactive compounds [33]. Salvadora persica is a valuable medicinal plant for the production of bioactive secondary metabolite content such as BITC [23], which has a potent anti-tumor activity [11, 14]. In the current study, Fe3O4, SiO2, and ZnO NPs of 0.5 or 2 mg/l concentrations were applied to Salvadora persica callus for two growth stages of 30 and 45 days, to evaluate the effect of NPs on callus biomass and to improve BITC production. Nanoparticle application showed positive effects on the fresh weight of Salvadora persica callus during the two growth stages, and this effect was NP type and concentration-dependent. The concentration of 2 mg/l for all applied NPs was significantly the most effective. Several studies have shown significant effects of NPs on callus induction and growth. Application of 10 mg/l of ZnO NPs can induce callus and shoot regeneration in rapeseed, in contrast, callus growth is significantly retarded by 25, 50, and 100 mg/l ZnO NPs [34]. In another study, Javed et al. [35] reported that 1 and 10 mg/l ZnO NPs are the best concentrations regarding the fresh weight of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni callus in comparison with control. The concentration of 1.5 mg/l of Fe3O4 strongly induces callus size of flax [36]. It can be explained by the proven fact that optimum concentration of different NPs may act as abiotic elicitors for improving callus growth, increasing chlorophyll level and cell division that really reflects on plant fresh weight [35, 36].

The BITC content in Salvadora persica callus was variously affected according to NP type, concentration, and callus growth stage, in which 0.5 mg/l ZnO NPs greatly enhanced BITC contents of 45-day-old callus. On the other hand, BITC accumulation slightly increased in callus treated with 2 mg/l SiO2 NPs for 45 days, while no changes were observed in 30-day-old callus treated with the same NP concentration. Similar findings were reported for the accumulation of thymol and carvacrol in thyme callus stressed with different concentrations of ZnO NPs [37].

By comparing the growth of callus with the accumulation of BITC, it was observed that due to the application of NPs at different concentrations, Fe3O4 NPs at both concentrations and SiO2 at 0.5 mg/l decreased the callus growth and secondary metabolism, as a nonessential mechanism of plant life, also decreased by increasing exposure time, while SiO2 NPs at 2 mg/l and ZnO NPs stimulated callus growth. They greatly increased the accumulation of BITC, except ZnO NPs at 2 mg/l that may be a supra-optimum concentration that inhibited the accumulation of BITC after prolonged exposure (45 days). The synthesis of secondary metabolites in plants is closely related to the growth stage and environmental conditions, and each type of secondary metabolites has different biosynthetic pathways at different stages of growth. In general, the secondary metabolite concentration peaked during the exponential growth stage and decreased afterward during the stationary stage of the callus culture [38].

The NPs can elicit oxidative damage in plants by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as H2O2 and hydroxyl radical, causing damage to lipid membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids, which results in denaturation of cellular components or activation of the defense system in plants [39, 40].

Treatments of Fe3O4, SiO2, and ZnO NPs at different concentrations induced oxidative stress in Salvadora persica callus by ROS production and lipid peroxidation that may in favor in BITC production. Both MDA and H2O2 are as reliable biomarkers of oxidative state. A significant increase in MDA levels was observed in Salvadora persica callus treated with all NPs with different concentrations compared with control, except 0.5 mg/l ZnO NPs. On the contrary, H2O2 levels significantly reduced in all NP-treated callus, except that treated with 2.0 mg/l Fe3O4 NPs. The imposed oxidative stress by different NPs can be alleviated by developing a defense mechanism including antioxidant scavenging enzymes such as POD and SOD to detoxify ROS induced by NPs. The oxidative enzymes SODs convert superoxide radicals into H2O2 and molecular oxygen, then peroxidases convert H2O2 into water. In plants, SODs contain several isoforms depending on their metal cofactor [40, 41]. The most prominent forms in Salvadora persica callus were one manganese SOD isoform (Mn SOD), two iron SOD isoforms (Fe SODI and II), and two copper/zinc isoforms (Cu/Zn SODI and II). The activity of Cu/Zn SOD I and II was increased in all Fe3O4, SiO2, and ZnO NP treatments at different doses, reflecting the antioxidant activity of Salvadora persica callus in the response to NP stress, compared with control. As expected, the activity of the three POD isoforms was increased in all NP-treated callus compared with untreated callus. This may be a result of enhanced transcription of genes related to antioxidant capacity [17, 42]. These data are consistent with the results of an independent study, where Fe3O4 NPs (50 to 200 mg/g) initiate protective mechanisms to reduce oxidative stress by increased activities of POD and SOD in the wheat seedlings [43]. The ZnO NPs caused significant increases in SOD and POD activities in tomato plants to overcome the toxic effect of ZnO NPs [42]. Similar activity was demonstrated for SiO2 NPs effect on cotton plants [44].

The changes were observed in the ISSR profile indicating that the applied doses of NPs caused genetic variation that was dose and NP type-dependent. In the ISSR profile, the appearance of new DNA bands and the absence of normal ones could be described as a mutation, which probably results from DNA damage or rearrangements caused by NP-induced genetic variation. Genomic template stability is a reflection of the changes observed in the ISSR profile [16]. It was observed that the GTS percentage decreased with increased NP concentration for the three studied NPs. In accordance with previous literatures, Fe3O4 NPs displayed the lowest genetic toxicity in Salvadora persica callus. Previous studies also presented similar effects by the same NPs in flax callus cultures [36] and in rocket seedlings [33]. The concentration of 2 mg/l of both ZnO and SiO2 NPs strongly reduced GTS by 38.3 and 29.8%, respectively. Moreover, they scored the highest percentage of unique specific bands by 33.3 and 12.1%, respectively. The production of these bands may in favor of increased biomass for these treatments. Most likely, these bands are formed from the potential of NPs in causing genomic variation by impairing mitosis and altering DNA by inducing chromosomal anomalies [40].

The induced genetic variation of NPs can be explained by their interaction with DNA and/or nuclear proteins, following their diffusion into the cell, affecting the cell cycle, or a result of oxidative stress induced by reactive oxygen species and by affecting the ability of DNA repair mechanisms. The inverse relationship was demonstrated between the size of NPs and genotoxicity, while a direct relation was found with exposure duration and concentration [40].

Transmission electron microscope image analysis was performed to assess the cellular effect of different NPs on Salvadora persica callus. Images of TEM revealed that different NPs induced ultrastructure changes in Salvadora persica callus cells. Regular cellular organization and organelle structures have been observed in control cells. At a low concentration of 0.5 mg/l, TEM images showed the deposition of ZnO NPs in the callus cell wall via apoplastic course. At 2 mg/l concentration of all NPs, the cells appeared with thicker walls and the inflow of NPs inside the cytoplasm was much clear. These ultra-structural changes might be associated with oxidative stress induced by different NPs and a cause of their genotoxic effect. These results are in harmony with Radi et al. [45], who concluded that ZnO NPs mediated changes in cell ultrastructure of pomegranate callus cells. Also, Ghosh et al. [46] detected a similar effect of ZnO NPs in Allium cepa root cells. Slomberg and Schoenfisch [47] observed by TEM the deposition of SiO2 NPs into the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Yuan et al. [48] noticed the accumulation of Fe NPs in aggregates into cell walls and transported via the apoplastic pathway in the Capsicum annuum roots. In the current study, NPs used were 25–55 nm, which are larger than the estimated plant cell wall pore size of 5–20 nm. However, they have been observed in intercellular spaces. It is possible that NPs may induce cell wall deformation and increase its porosity to allow their access to intercellular space [48].

Conclusion

The present study provides a direct approach for increasing biomass of Salvadora persica callus and BITC production by using NPs. An evidence for genetic variation and bioaccumulation of Fe3O4, SiO2, and ZnO NPs in Salvadora persica callus was provided, which shows the need for further research to overcome these side effects. In general, the results indicate that NPs have positive effects on Salvadora persica callus fresh weight and BITC accumulation, which encourage further studies on this point and using other more advanced in vitro methods to enhance the accumulation of this valuable anticancer compound, such as suspension cultures, bioreactors, and hairy root cultures.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

BITC:

Benzyl isothiocyanate

CFW:

Callus fresh weight

GTS:

Genomic DNA template stability

ISSR:

Inter simple sequence repeats

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

NBT:

Nitro blue tetrazolium

NPs:

Nanoparticles

PAGE:

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

POD:

Peroxidase

RAPD:

Random amplification of polymorphic DNA

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SOD:

Superoxide dismutases

TCA:

Trichloroacetic acid

TBA:

Thiobarbituric acid

TMB:

3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine

References

  1. 1.

    Sharada H, Hendawey M, Hegazi G, Fouda M, Attia M (2018) Biochemical behavior of Salvadora persica callus towards TiO2 and CuO nanoparticles. J Biol Chem Environ Sci 12:435–459

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wang X, Yang X, Chen S, Li Q, Wang W, Hou C et al (2016) Zinc oxide nanoparticles affect biomass accumulation and photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 6:1243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Da Costa MVJ, Sharma PK (2016) Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on growth, morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant response in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica 54:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0167-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mousa S, Kouhi M, Lahouti M (2018) Application of ZnO nanoparticles for inducing callus in tissue culture of rapeseed. Int J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen SL, Yu H, Luo HM, Wu Q, Li CF, Steinmetz A (2016) Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: problems, progress, and prospects. Chinas Med 11:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-016-0108-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Khatak M, Khatak S, Siddqui AA, Vasudeva N, Aggarwal A, Aggarwal P (2010) Salvadora persica. Pharmacogn Rev 4:209–214. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.70920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hammad H, Khaled M, Al-Qaoud K, Hammad MM (2019) Effect of Salvadora persica Linn root aqueous extract on oral epithelial dysplasia and oral cancer cell lines. Trop J Pharm Res 18(12):2591–2596

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Al Bratty M, Makeen HA, Alhazmi HA, Syame SM, Abdalla AN, Homeida HE, Sultana S, Ahsan W, Khalid A (2020) Phytochemical, cytotoxic, and antimicrobial evaluation of the fruits of miswak plant, Salvadora persica L. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4521951

  9. 9.

    Verma PR, Khan F, Banerjee S (2020) Salvadora persica root extract-mediated fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles and characterization. Inorg Nano-Met Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701556.2020.1793355

  10. 10.

    Mathur S, Singh SG, Batra A (2002) An efficient in vitro method for mass propagation of Salvadora persica via apical meristem. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263149

  11. 11.

    Lin J-F, Tsai T-F, Yang S-C, Lin Y-C, Chen H-E, Chou K-Y et al (2017) Benzyl isothiocyanate induces reactive oxygen species-initiated autophagy and apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget 8:20220–20234. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang Q-C, Pan Z-H, Liu B-N, Meng Z-W, Wu X, Zhou Q-H et al (2017) Benzyl isothiocyanate induces protective autophagy in human lung cancer cells through an endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated mechanism. Acta Pharmacol Sin 38:539–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2016.146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ma L, Chen Y, Han R, Wang S (2019) Benzyl isothiocyanate inhibits invasion and induces apoptosis via reducing S100A4 expression and increases PUMA expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Braz J Med Biol Res 52(4):e8409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20198409.

  14. 14.

    Zhu M, Li W, Dong X, Chen Y, Lu Y, Lin B et al (2017) Benzyl-isothiocyanate induces apoptosis and inhibits migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. J Cancer 8:240–248. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.16402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yang A, Wu J, Deng C, Wang T, Bian P (2018) Genotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles in plants demonstrated using transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 101:514–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2420-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Plaksenkova I, Jermaļonoka M, Bankovska L, Gavarāne I, Gerbreders V, Sledevskis E et al (2019) Effects of Fe3O4 nanoparticle stress on the growth and development of rocket Eruca sativa. J Nanomater 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2678247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mosa KA, El-Naggar M, Ramamoorthy K, Alawadhi H, Elnaggar A, Wartanian S et al (2018) Copper nanoparticles induced genotoxicty, oxidative stress, and changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene expression in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Front Plant Sci 9:872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bello-Bello JJ, Spinoso-Castillo JL, Arano-Avalos S, Martínez-Estrada E, Arellano-García ME, Pestryakov A et al (2018) Cytotoxic, genotoxic, and polymorphism effects on Vanilla planifolia jacks ex Andrews after long-term exposure to Argovit(®) silver nanoparticles. Nanomater (Basel, Switzerland) 8:754. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8100754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Liu X, Du J, Khan MA, Cheng J, Wei C, Mei Z et al (2020) Analysis of genetic diversity and similarities between different Lycium varieties based on ISSR analysis and RAMP-PCR markers. World Acad Sci J 2:83–90. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2020.39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Soliman ERS, El-Azab EM, Soliman MSA, Badr A (2020) Phenotypic and molecular polymorphism in M2 generation of soybean plants derived through application of gamma irradiation. Biosci Res 17:1554–1565

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bornet B, Branchard M (2001) Nonanchored inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: reproducible and specific tools for genome fingerprinting. Plant Mol Biol Report 19:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hegazi G, El-Hanafy N, Abu-Elkheir Z, Hussein I (2016) Benzyl isothiocyanate production from Salvadora persica L. callus cultures. IOSR J Biotechnol Biochem 2:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kiddle G, Bennett RN, Botting NP, Davidson NE, Robertson AAB, Wallsgrove RM (2001) High-performance liquid chromatographic separation of natural and synthetic desulphoglucosinolates and their chemical validation by UV, NMR and chemical ionisation-MS methods. Phytochem Anal 12:226–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Junglee S, Urban L, Sallanon H, Lopez-Lauri F (2014) Optimized assay for hydrogen peroxide determination in plant tissue using potassium iodide. Am J Anal Chem 05:730–736. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2014.511081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Weydert CJ, Cullen JJ (2010) Measurement of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase in cultured cells and tissue. Nat Protoc 5:51–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shivakumar P, Geetha H, Shetty H (2003) Peroxidase activity and isozyme analysis of pearl millet seedlings and their implications in downy mildew disease resistance. Plant Sci 164:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00339-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR (1997) Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Report 15:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bozzola JJ, Russell LD (1992) Electron microscopy: principles and techniques for biologists. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Portland

  30. 30.

    Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple “F” test. Biometrics 11:1–42

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1990) Statistical methods. In: Statistical methods, 8th, editor edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Večeřová K, Večeřa Z, Dočekal B, Oravec M, Pompeiano A, Tříska J et al (2016) Changes of primary and secondary metabolites in barley plants exposed to CdO nanoparticles. Environ Pollut 218:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ghorbanpour M, Hadian J (2015) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes stimulate callus induction, secondary metabolites biosynthesis and antioxidant capacity in medicinal plant Satureja khuzestanica grown in vitro. Carbon N Y 94:749–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBON.2015.07.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mousa S, Kouhi M, Lahouti M (2018) Application of ZnO nanoparticles for inducing callus in tissue culture of rapeseed. Vol. 14

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Javed R, Yucesan B, Zia M, Gurel E (2018) Elicitation of secondary metabolites in callus cultures of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni grown under ZnO and CuO nanoparticles stress. Sugar Tech 20:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0539-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kokina I, Mickeviča I, Jahundoviča I, Ogurcovs A, Krasovska M, Jermaļonoka M et al (2017) Plant explants grown on medium supplemented with Fe3O4 nanoparticles have a significant increase in embryogenesis. J Nanomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4587147

  37. 37.

    Mosavat N, Golkar P, Yousefifard M, Javed R (2019) Modulation of callus growth and secondary metabolites in different Thymus species and Zataria multiflora micropropagated under ZnO nanoparticles stress. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1727

  38. 38.

    Pan Y, Li L, Xiao S, Chen Z, Sarsaiya S, Zhang S, ShangGuan Y, Liu H, Xu D (2020) Callus growth kinetics and accumulation of secondary metabolites of Bletilla striata Rchb.F. using a callus suspension culture. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220084

  39. 39.

    Chang YN, Zhang M, Xia L, Zhang J, Xing G (2012) The toxic effects and mechanisms of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Materials (Basel) 5:2850–2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5122850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Karami Mehrian S, De Lima R (2016) Nanoparticles cyto and genotoxicity in plants: mechanisms and abnormalities. Environ Nanotechnology, Monit Manag 6:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2016.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Alscher RG (2002) Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J Exp Bot 53:1331–1341. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang XP, Li QQ, Pei ZM, Wang SC (2018) Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the growth, photosynthetic traits, and antioxidative enzymes in tomato plants. Biol Plant 62:801–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-018-0813-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Konate A, He X, Zhang Z, Ma Y, Zhang P, Alugongo GM et al (2017) Magnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticles reduce heavy metals uptake and mitigate their toxicity in wheat seedling. Sustain 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050790

  44. 44.

    Le VN, Rui Y, Gui X, Li X, Liu S, Han Y (2014) Uptake, transport, distribution and bio-effects of SiO2 nanoparticles in Bt-transgenic cotton. J Nanobiotechnology 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-014-0050-8

  45. 45.

    Radi AA, Farghaly FA, Al-Kahtany FA, Hamada AM (2018) Zinc oxide nanoparticles-mediated changes in ultrastructure and macromolecules of pomegranate callus cells. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 135:247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-018-1460-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ghosh M, Jana A, Sinha S, Jothiramajayam M, Nag A, Chakraborty A et al (2016) Effects of ZnO nanoparticles in plants: cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, deregulation of antioxidant defenses, and cell-cycle arrest. Mutat Res - Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 807:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Slomberg DL, Schoenfisch MH (2012) Silica nanoparticle phytotoxicity to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Sci Technol 46:10247–10254. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300949f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yuan J, Chen Y, Li H, Lu J, Zhao H, Liu M et al (2018) New insights into the cellular responses to iron nanoparticles in Capsicum annuum. Sci Rep 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18055-w

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This study received no funding grant.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MSF and HMS supervised and analyzed the biochemical tests. M H.H, GAH, and M EA planned and performed the in vitro propagation section and analyze its data and performed the transmission electron microscopy section. NIE performed the ISSR assay. ERSS performed the genotoxicity analysis, analysed and presented the ISSR data, wrote and revised the manuscript, and is responsible for the publication of the study. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham R. S. Soliman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fouda, M.S., Hendawey, M.H., Hegazi, G.A. et al. Nanoparticles induce genetic, biochemical, and ultrastructure variations in Salvadora persica callus. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19, 27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00124-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Meswak
  • Nanoparticles
  • Benzyl isothiocyanate
  • ISSR
  • Antioxidant
\