Skip to main content

16S rRNA gene sequencing and MALDI TOF mass spectroscopy identification of Leuconostoc mesenteroides isolated from Algerian raw camel milk



Eighty-three strains of Leuconostoc mesenteroides were isolated from Algerian raw camel milk. Based on morphological, biochemical, and physiological characters tests, strains were identified as Ln. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides. Seven strains had a remarkable antagonistic and probiotic characterization. The present study aims at identifying these strains by means of 16 s rRNA gene sequencing and Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), extending phenotypic and genotypic studies done previously.


The phyloproteomic dendrograms of the studied strains based on MALDI-TOF MS provided the same identification with more intraspecific information from the 16S rRNA gene sequencing based on phylogenetic analysis. The latter were in agreement with the previous biochemical/physiological identification, the seven isolated strains were Ln. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides.


Remarkably, MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting was found to be effective enough as 16S rRNA gene sequencing identification, allowing faster and more reliable analysis than biochemical/physiological methods.


In Algeria, as in many countries with arid and desert ecosystems, camels (Camelus dromedarius), because of their great adaptation to hostile climatic conditions, play an important role in the life of these communities by providing meat, milk, and transport [1, 2]

Camel milk is a high-quality nutritious food due to its richness in proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, vitamins, and mineral salts [3, 4], and high bacterial diversity, suggesting a potential resource for the food industry [5] with antimicrobial potential, antiviral and protective activities against pathogenic bacteria [6]. Due to that, it has experienced renewed interest in recent years. Although it has been the subject of multiple works from all over the world especially in Algeria [7].

Camel milk microflora’s recent study showed its composition of four phyla; Firmicutes (64.7%), Proteobacteria (30%), Actinobacteria (4.9%), and Bacteroidetes (0.4%) [5]. The higher numbers were attributed to lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and leuconostocs have often been found as the major genus in camel milk [8,9,10].

The taxonomic characterization of the 29 Leuconostoc species is still controversial and the methods applied including cultivation, phenotypic/biochemical, and non–specific molecular methods could lead to misidentifications [11], especially in sub-level to differentiate among the Leuconostoc mesenteroides subspecies. To date, five subspecies are included Ln. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides, Ln. mesenteroides subsp. cremoris, Ln. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum, Ln. mesenteroides subsp. Suionicum, and Ln. mesenteroides subsp. Jonggajibkimchii ( They have been known to play important roles in the production of various fermented foods, the food industry, and food preservation [12,13,14,15].

Using physiological, serological, and biochemical methods, it typically takes a lot of work, resources, and time to identify microorganisms (such bacteria, yeasts, and molds). In addition to these techniques, several molecular (nucleic acid-based) approaches have been developed. Most of the genotypic identification methods are mainly based on the polymorphism of the 16S rRNA gene sequences. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene has been a reference method for species-level identification of various groups of bacteria [1]. Polymerase chain reaction tests developed with primers and probes directed toward the identification of gene sequences encoding 16S ribosomal RNA can identify the presence of DNA from most bacterial species [2]. Among the conserved genes that encode rRNA, 16S rRNA genes are considered as a standard for microbial identification and taxonomic classification [16]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting either partial or whole 16S rRNA gene has been applied for the identification of several Leuconostoc spp. from Algerian camel milk [10, 17, 18].

Although the reliability of the applied genomic methods, such as 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, is high, they cannot provide quick results. However, new technologies for the accurate and rapid identification of bacteria are essential in various fields of applied microbiology. Mass spectrometry is an alternative solution for identifying and strain typing [19]. MALDI TOF technique is a bacterial chemotaxonomic method with strong potential in bacterial species differentiation and has been proven to be effective [20], this method can examine the mass-to-charge ratio of a wide range of biomolecules, including peptides and proteins [21]. it can be considered a fast, accurate, and low-cost method for the identification of Gram-positive bacteria such as LAB [22]. The ribosomal proteins in particular are the most reliable biomarkers for identifying bacteria because of their abundance and moderate hydrophobicity, they are well-suited for effective ionization [23]. Thus, using this technique, an adequate amount of stable mass signals for the ribosomal protein peptides typically 2000 to 20,000 Da can be obtained. The mass signals are used to produce profile spectra, which comprise a series of peaks that are conserved at the genus, species, and even subspecies level [24]

The present study aims at identifying Leuconostoc mesenteroides collected from Algerian raw camel milk, by means of 16 s rRNA sequencing and Matrix-assisted laser desorption ∕ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), extending phenotypic and genotypic studies done previously [25] by comparing these two techniques with the previous classical methods in accuracy, cost, efficacity.


Strains origin and culture conditions

The strains were isolated from 12 raw camel milk samples that were obtained from different Algerian arid zones. The milk was collected in sterile glass bottles; stored at 4 to 6 °C before analysis. The samples were analyzed within 12 to 30 h of collection.

Eighty-three strains of Leuconostoc mesenteroides were isolated using a selective medium, MRS (pH 6.8) supplemented with 30 µg/ml of vancomycin. They were identified by phenotypic and biochemical methods. We retained seven strains (LnC12, LnC21, LnC23, LnC26, LnC28, LnC29, and LnC33) that showed remarkable inhibitory activity against Listeria spp. including L. monocytogenes. The strains were subcultured and enriched in MRS broth for 6 h at 37 °C. (Supplementary details on camel’s milk, collected samples, or phenotypical, biochemical, and physiological tests could be found on Chentouf and Benmechernene, 2013 research paper [25].

Reference strains used for genetic identification are from different sources; a standard collection of Spanish cultures and a standard collection of cultures from the University of Ghent (Belgium). Reference strains are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Reference strains used in phylogenetic and proteomic identification

Bacterial identification and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing

In order to isolate genomic DNA, the protocol of Fernández-No et al. (2013) [26] was used. The PCR amplification was carried out with p8FPL/p806R universal primer pair: p8FPL (5′-AGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and p806R (5′-GGACTACCAGGGTATCTAAT-3′). DNA extraction was performed using the DNeasy Kit (Invitrogen).

The PCR reaction was performed in a “My Cycler” thermal cycler (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, USA). The cycling program was as follows: template DNA was initially denatured at 94 °C for 7 min. Thereafter, products were amplified by 35 cycles. Each cycle consists of denaturation for 60 s at 94 °C, primer annealing for 60 s at 55 °C, and extension for 60 s at 72 °C. The last cycle was followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 15 min. The PCR was performed as described by Bohme et al. (2011) [27]. PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis, using a 2.5% agarose gel in TAE buffer (Tris- Acetate-EDTA).

The 16S rRNA gene isolates were subjected to sequencing using both primers used for PCR (Forward (p8FPL) and Reverse (p806R). Sequencing reactions were analyzed in an automated sequencing system (ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer, Applied Biosystems) with the POP-7 system. The gene sequences were analyzed with Chromas software (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) and aligned using Clustal X software [28, 29]. These sequences were identified by searching for sequence homology between published reference sequences using the BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), [30]. Homologies with 99–100% a strain type were considered as excellent identifications.

Phylogenetic and molecular analyses were performed with MEGA 5.0 software [31]. Phylogenetic clustering and tree-based phylogeny construction were performed using the neighbor-joining method [28] using the “Bootstrap method” as a test of phylogeny [32, 33]. Evolutionary divergence was estimated using MEGA 5.0 software [33].

Identification of Leuconostoc strains by the MALDI-TOF MS

According to the method described by Böhme et al. (2010a, 2010b) [34, 35], bacterial isolates were prepared for MALDI-TOF MS. which was based on the lysis of bacterial cells with an aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and acetonitrile (ACN) combination (Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ) and the subsequent mixing of each sample with a matrix solution made up of cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (-CHCA), acetonitrile, and TFA to extract the cell proteins.

With the use of the parameters described in Benmechernene et al. (2014) [36], mass spectra were produced using a voyager mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). There were two extractions for each strain and double measurements of the two extracts, yielding a total of four spectra for each bacterial strain. Data Explorer software (version 4.0) (Applied Biosystems) was used to analyze the mass spectra for baseline correction and noise filtering after they had been externally calibrated using a mixture of 1 pmol/l oxidized B-chain insulin and 1 pmol/l bovine insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Mass spectra were meticulously analyzed with Data Explorer software (version 4.0). Data listings with m/z values have been extracted from mass spectrometry data including signals with relative intensities greater than 2%. The mass peak lists obtained were analyzed and compared using peaks that spanned from 2000 to 10,000 Da in mass because of the reproducibility of the spectral profile in this mass range.

The mass lists of all studied strains have been clustered using the SPECLUST web interface [37] as described by Quintela-Baluja et al. (2013) [38].

Finally, phyloproteomic clustering was confirmed by mass list analysis utilizing Statgraphics Plus software (version 5.1).


Genetic identification of Leuconostoc strains by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Using the previously described universal 16S rRNA primer pair, all bacterial strains were submitted to genetic analysis based on a 1500-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene. The obtained sequences of each sample were compared against strains placed in the NCBI GenBank database ( using the BLAST tool. All the seven strains (LnC12, LnC21, LnC23, LnC26, LnC28, LnC29, LnC33) were successfully identified as Leuconostoc mesenteroides.

In order to construct the phylogenetic tree, the genus Lactococcus, which belongs to the group of lactic acid bacteria, was chosen as an outgroup. The genus Ln. pseudomesenteroides is quite phylogenetically close to Leuconostoc (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic dendrograms of the studied strains based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing

MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting and phyloproteomic clustering

Four spectra were obtained for each strain to ensure the reproducibility of these results [39]. The mass lists for each of the 28 strains analyzed were constructed using the SPECLUST application by determining the arithmetic means for m/z values and the standard deviation was less than 5 Da in the mass range of 2000–10,000 Da. The mass lists include 72 mass peaks that were generated for 7 Leuconostoc strains with two Lactococcus strains classified as an outgroup. While 54 peaks were observed in Leuconostoc strains, 18 peaks were specific to the Lactococcus genus and only two peaks were shared by the two genera.

It should be noted that peaks at m/z 6242 Da and m/z 5118 Da were present in all Leuconostoc species. These peaks are specific for the genus Leuconostoc (Table 2).

Table 2 Mass peaks of specific species of Ln. carnosum, Ln. pseudomesenteroides, and Ln. mesenteroides [36]

The MALDI-TOF MS spectral profile (fingerprint) revealed good results for all the analyzed strains. The mass lists include 62 masses peaks that were generated from 7 Leuconostoc strains (data not shown). Thus, from the 54 peaks present in the genus Leuconostoc, 17 were present in more than 90% of the analyzed samples. Among them, 2 peaks (5118 et 6242 Da) were observed in common (Fig. 2) comparing with MALDI-TOF MS spectra of Ln. carnosum, Ln. mesenteroides, and Ln. pseudomesenteroide reference strains (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

MALDI-TOF MS spectra of the LnC33 Leuconostoc mesenteroides strain isolated from camel milk. Specific genus peaks marked as () are present in other Leuconostoc strains

Fig. 3
figure 3

MALDI-TOF MS spectra of Ln. carnosum, Ln. mesenteroides, and Ln. pseudomesenteroide reference strains. Common peaks to each strain are indicated by () [36]

Furthermore, the phyloproteomic dendrograms of the studied strains based on MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting (Fig. 4) provided more intraspecific information from the 16S rRNA gene sequencing based on phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1), allowing precise discrimination among all Leuconostoc species and with the out-group strains (L. lactis). Clearly, all the studied strains belonging to the same species or subspecies were clustered consistently as separate groups. Thus, the phyloproteomic clustering showed a clear differentiation of Leuconostoc species. All the isolates are set together with the Ln. mesenteroides LMG 6908 and Ln. mesenteroides subsp mesenetroides CECT 219 reference strains, however, the other reference strains were out-grouped.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Phyloproteomic dendrograms of the studied strains based on MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting


Raw camel milk is a good source of dairy LAB strains, including Leuconostoc spp. [9, 40, 41]. Several methods have been developed for identification of Leuconostoc, which include Phenotypical, biochemical characterization, and different genotypical methods such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing, RAPD fingerprinting, Pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), chromosomal DNA restriction analysis and multiple molecular markers sequencing [42]. In recent years, MALDITOF MS was found to be very fast and effective as molecular microorganism identification method [43, 44].

A number of 83 strains of Leuconostoc were isolated, earlier, from raw camel milk in arid and semi-arid zones of Algeria. Based on morphological, biochemical and physiological tests, these strains were identified as Leuconostoc mesneteroides subsp. mesenteroides. Among them, seven strains had an exceptional antagonistic and probiotic properties. In this work, these strains (LnC12, LnC21, LnC23, LnC26, LnC28, LnC29, LnC33) were identified and typed by molecular methods.

The phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing permitted a clear differentiation between and within Leuconostoc and Lactococcus. Thus, phylogenetic analysis indicated that all strains isolated from raw camel milk were grouped into a common cluster with reference strains Ln. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (LMG 219) and Ln. mesenteroides (LMG 6908). This confirmed the identity of these strains as Ln. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides. However, Ln. pseudomesenteroides (CECT 11,482) and Ln. pseudomesenteroides (CECT 4027) were grouped together but were not in the same cluster as Ln. mesenteroides strains. Lactococcus strains are grouped into two distinct subgroups corresponding to Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (MG 1363) and L. lactis subsp. lactis (CECT 4432). These two subgroups were separated by a short distance due to their genetic similarity to Ln. mesenteroides and Ln. pseudomesenteroides. The sequencing of 16S rRNA for the studied strains confirmed phenotypical and genotypical identification results. The strains LnC12, LnC21, LnC23, LnC26, LnC28, LnC29, LnC33 belonged to Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides. A study on genomic identification of Leuconostoc spp. isolated from Algerian raw camel milk was carried out by Benmechernene et al. (2014) [36] and Mokdad et al. (2020) [18] has been made which showed similar results.

However, the 16S rRNA gene has limitations in differentiating among closely related species and subspecies needing additional techniques, such as the Matrix-assisted laser desorption ∕ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) [45].

The objective of the proteomic analysis was to quickly and easily extract low molecular weight soluble proteins from entire bacterial cells. It relies on the detection of mass-to-charge ratio abbreviated as m/z of ribosomal proteins of the bacteria, which helps to provide a unique mass spectrum of the bacteria within a short period of time [46]. One of the main benefits of this extraction method is that it allows appropriate contact time between bacterial cells and lysis reagents, leading to good cellular protein extraction and high reliable spectra that allow inter- and intraspecies differentiation within a mass range of 2000–10,000 Da [47].

The identification with MALDI-TOF MS is provided by comparing the spectrum with the spectra of reference strains based on the closest match [48], there are few studies on molecular identification using MALDI-TOF MS of Leuconostoc mesenteroides and the most similar study to ours in terms of bacterial provenance and all other conditions is that of Benmechernene et al. (2014) [36].

All bacterial strains that were submitted to the MALDI-TOF MS assay generated a spectrum that permitted all Leuconostoc strains to be differentiated at to the species level, although to the subspecies level. The two peaks were shared by all the analyzed strains with the slight difference compared with those found by Benmechernene et al. (2014) [36] such as the highest common intensity peak that appeared at m/z 5117.12 Da, and the second at m/z 6241.42 Da instead of 5118 and 6242, respectively; this may be caused by bacterial response to stress and environmental changes, including storage and handling [36].

Exceptionally, fingerprinting revealed different results; the 7110 Da mass peak was observed at several Leuconostoc strains and it was not considered as Leuconostoc mesenteroides-specific mass peak. Comparing our mass lists peaks with Leuconostoc mesenteroides identified by Benmechernene et al. (2014) [36]; three peaks were noticed in common (5556, 7113, and 7626 Da) these peaks could serve as biomarker peaks in future analyses considering that the technique takes into account the biomarker ion peaks in a spectrum and relies on the characteristic mass profile obtained by a set of ion peaks, which represents a "fingerprint" of the bacteria [49].

Therefore, phyloproteomic analysis allowed to group Ln. mesenteroides strains into different subgroups, while the phylogenetic proximity of these strains did not allow such differentiation [50]. The use of MALDI-TOF MS for the characterization of lactic acid bacteria was carried out by De Bruyne (2011) [50] and Benmechernene et al. (2014) [36] regarding the proteomic identification of Leuconostoc from food sources and Algerian raw camel milk, respectively.

Molecular identification of all seven strains concorded with the phenotypic/biochemical identification done previously [25] as Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides.

The application of MALDI TOF mass spectrometry fingerprinting has been successfully applied to this bacterial group and has proven to be a simple, fast, and inexpensive complementary method for bacterial identification to the species and subspecies level, unlike phenotypic/biochemical methods which were very long in fact, however, MALDI TOF MS helps in avoiding unworthy identification of clone of the same strain that could be wrong in classical methods [20].

Researchers consider it as the most reliable identification technique taking intact cells or crude protein extracts are directly analyzed resulting in a mass spectral profile, which is characteristic for the considered organism [16].


In conclusion, this study employed nucleotide sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, and MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting, in the identification of Leuconostoc spp. isolated from Algerian raw camel milk and it has provided more genetic characterization for the species. Additionally, the identification was necessary for further studies like using Leuconostoc mesenteroides as a starter in various fermenting food.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Supplementary data to this article could be found at





Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo (Spanish Type Culture Collection)


Deoxyribonucleic acid




Lactic acid bacteria


Laboratory of Microbiology of Ghent University (Belgium)




Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry


Man Rogosa and Sharpe


Not determined


Polymerase chain reaction


Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis


Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA


Ribosomal ribonucleic acid






Aqueous trifluoroacetic acid


α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid


  1. Berhe T, Ipsen R, Seifu E, Kurtu MY, Fugl A, Hansen EB (2019) Metagenomic analysis of bacterial community composition in Dhanaan : Ethiopian traditional fermented camel milk. FEMS Microbiol 366:fnz228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benaissa MH, Youngs CR, Mimoune N, Faye B, Mimouni FZ, Kaidi R (2021) First serological evidence of BHV-1 virus in Algerian dromedary camels: Seroprevalence and associated risk factors. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 76:101638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katinan CR, Sadat AW, Chatigre KO, Bohoussou KM, Assidjo NE (2012) Évaluation de la qualité chimique et microbiologique des laits caillés artisanaux produits et consommés dans la ville de Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire. J Appl Biosci 55:4020–4027

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu C, Liu L-X, Yang J, Liu Y-G (2023) Exploration and analysis of the composition and mechanism of efficacy of camel milk. Food Biosci 53:102564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadri Z, Spitaels F, Cnockaert M, Amar M, Joossens M, Vandamme P (2021) The bacterial diversity of raw Moroccon camel milk. Int J Food Microbiol 341:109050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mati A, Senoussi-Ghezali C, Si Ahmed Zennia S, Almi-Sebbane D, El-Hatmi H, Girardet J-M (2017) Dromedary camel milk proteins, a source of peptides having biological activities – A review. Int Dairy J 73:25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boudalia S, Gueroui Y, Zebsa R, Arbia T, Chiheb AE, Benada M, Hadri Z, Youcefi A, Bousbia A (2023) Camel livestock in the Algerian Sahara under the context of climate change: Milk properties and livestock production practices. J Agric Food Res 11:100528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashmaig A, Hasan A, El Gaali E (2009) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Sudanese fermented camel’s milk (Gariss). Afr J Microbiol Res 3:451–457

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akhmetsadykova SH (2015) Lactic acid bacteria biodiversity in raw and fermented camel milk. Afr J Food Sci Technol 06:84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Belkheir K, Centeno J, ZadiKaram H, Karam N, Carballo J (2016) Potential technological interest of indigenous lactic acid bacteria from Algerian camel milk. Ital J Food Sci 28:598–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guglielmotti DM, Pujato SA, Quiberoni A, Suárez VB (2022) Hsp60 gene as a reliable target for taxonomical identification and discrimination of Leuconostoc species of dairy origin. Int Dairy J 126:105227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung JY, Lee SH, Jeon CO (2014) Kimchi microflora: history, current status, and perspectives for industrial kimchi production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2385–2393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh VP (2018) Recent approaches in food bio-preservation - a review. Open Vet J 8:104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raj T, Chandrasekhar K, Kumar AN, Kim S-H (2022) Recent biotechnological trends in lactic acid bacterial fermentation for food processing industries. Syst Microbiol Biomanufacturing 2:14–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarhir ST, Belkhou R, Bouseta A, Hayaloglu AA (2023) Evaluation of techno-functional and biochemical characteristics of selected lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides) used for the production of Moroccan fermented milk: Lben. Int Dairy J 140:105592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gantzias C, Lappa IK, Aerts M, Georgalaki M, Manolopoulou E, Papadimitriou K, Vandamme P (2020) MALDI-TOF MS profiling of non-starter lactic acid bacteria from artisanal cheeses of the Greek island of Naxos. Int J Food Microbiol 323:108586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benmechernene Z, Chentouf HF, Yahia B, Fatima G, Quintela-Baluja M, Calo-Mata P, Barros-Velázquez J (2013) Technological Aptitude and Applications of Bioactive Strains Isolated from Algerian Raw Camel Milk. BioMed Res Int. 2013:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mokdad FH, Benmechernene Z, Benyoucef A, Russo N, Randazzo CL, Caggia C, Kihal M (2020) Characterization of bioactive Leuconostoc mesenteroides producing bacteriocin strains isolated from camel and goat Algerian raw milks. PONTE Int Sci Res J 76.

  19. Haider A, Ringer M, Kotroczó Z, Mohácsi-Farkas C, Kocsis T (2023) The Current Level of MALDI-TOF MS applications in the detection of microorganisms: a short review of benefits and limitations. Microbiol Res 14:80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdelkader A, Tahri A, Bernard T, Cnockaert M, Aerts M, Daube G, Vandamme P (2021) Comparison of MALDI TOF MS profiling and 16S rRNA gene identification of presumptive lactic acid bacteria isolated from the traditional Algerian date product “Btana.” Applied Biology in Saharan Areas. 3:27–43

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simke F, Fischer P, Marx G, Schweikhard L (2022) Simulations of a digital ion filter and a digital ion trap for heavy biomolecules. Int J Mass Spectrom 473:116779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodríguez-Sánchez B, Alcalá L, Marín M, Ruiz A, Alonso E, Bouza E (2016) Evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS (Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) for routine identification of anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobe 42:101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Carolis E, Vella A, Vaccaro L, Torelli R, Spanu T, Fiori B, Posteraro B, Sanguinetti M (2014) Application of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical diagnostic microbiology. J Infect Dev Ctries 8:1081–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ashfaq MY, Da’na DA, Al-Ghouti MA (2022) Application of MALDI-TOF MS for identification of environmental bacteria: A review. J Environ Manage 305:114359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chentouf HF, Benmechernene Z (2013) Isolation and identification of Leuconostoc mesenteroides producing bacteriocin isolated from Algerian raw camel milk. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:2961–2969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernández-No IC, Böhme K, Díaz-Bao M, Cepeda A, Barros-Velázquez J, Calo-Mata P (2013) Characterisation and profiling of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus and Bacillus licheniformis by MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting. Food Microbiol 33:235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Böhme K, Fernández-No IC, Gallardo JM, Cañas B, Calo-Mata P (2011) Safety assessment of fresh and processed seafood products by MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting. Food Bioprocess Technol 4:907–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 9:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamura K, Peterson D, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) Phylogenetic and Molecular Evolutionary Analyses were Conducted Using MEGA ver 5

  34. Böhme K, Fernández-No IC, Barros-Velázquez J, Gallardo JM, Calo-Mata P, Cañas B (2010) Species differentiation of seafood spoilage and pathogenic gram-negative bacteria by MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting. J Proteome Res 9:3169–3183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Böhme K, Fernández-No IC, Barros-Velázquez J, Gallardo JM, Cañas B, Calo-Mata P (2010) Comparative analysis of protein extraction methods for the identification of seafood-borne pathogenic and spoilage bacteria by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 2:1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Benmechernene Z, Fernández-No I, Quintela-Baluja M, Böhme K, Kihal M, Calo-Mata P, Barros-Velázquez J (2014) Genomic and proteomic characterization of bacteriocin-producing strains isolated from raw camel milk in two Southwest Algerian Arid Zones. BioMed Res Int 2014:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alm R, Johansson P, Hjernø K, Emanuelsson C, Ringner M, Häkkinen J (2006) Detection and identification of protein isoforms using cluster analysis of MALDI− MS mass spectra. J Proteome Res 5:785–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Quintela-Baluja M, Böhme K, Fernández-No IC, Morandi S, Alnakip ME, Caamaño-Antelo S, Calo-Mata P (2013) Characterization of different food-isolated E nterococcus strains by MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting. Electrophoresis 34:2240–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pomastowski P, Złoch M, Rodzik A, Ligor M, Kostrzewa M, Buszewski B (2019) Analysis of bacteria associated with honeys of different geographical and botanical origin using two different identification approaches: MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rDNA PCR technique. PLOS ONE 14:e0217078 Dalisay DS (ed)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Khedid K, Faid M, Mokhtari A, Soulaymani A, Zinedine A (2009) Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the one humped camel milk produced in Morocco. Microbiol Res 164:81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jans C, Bugnard J, Njage PM, Lacroix C, Meile L (2012) Lactic acid bacteria diversity of African raw and fermented camel milk products reveals a highly competitive, potentially health-threatening predominant microflora. LWT 47:371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohania D, Nagpal R, Kumar M, Bhardwaj A, Yadav M, Jain S, Marotta F, Singh V, Parkash O, Yadav H (2008) Molecular approaches for identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria: Techniques for LAB identification. J Dig Dis 9:190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Croxatto A, Prod’hom G, Greub G (2012) Applications of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical diagnostic microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:380–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dingle TC, Butler-Wu SM (2013) MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for microorganism identification. Clin Lab Med 33:589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Foschi C, Laghi L, Parolin C, Giordani B, Compri M, Cevenini R, Vitali B (2017) Novel approaches for the taxonomic and metabolic characterization of lactobacilli: Integration of 16S rRNA gene sequencing with MALDI-TOF MS and 1H-NMR. PLOS ONE 12:e0172483 Manjarrez LAM (ed)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Carbonnelle E, Mesquita C, Bille E, Day N, Dauphin B, Beretti J-L, Ferroni A, Gutmann L, Nassif X (2011) MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry tools for bacterial identification in clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Biochem 44:104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Alnakip ME, Rhouma NR, Abd-Elfatah EN, Quintela-Baluja M, Böhme K, Fernández-No I, Calo-Mata P (2020) Discrimination of major and minor streptococci incriminated in bovine mastitis by MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Res Vet Sci 132:426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Popović NT, Kazazić SP, Strunjak-Perović I, Čož-Rakovac R (2017) Differentiation of environmental aquatic bacterial isolates by MALDI-TOF MS. Environ Res 152:7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dieckmann R, Malorny B (2011) Rapid screening of epidemiologically important salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovars by whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4136–4146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bruyne K, Slabbinck B, Waegeman W, Vauterin P, Baets B, Vandamme P (2011) Bacterial species identification from MALDI-TOF mass spectra through data analysis and machine learning. Syst Appl Microbiol 34:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Thanks are due to the Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, School of Veterinary Sciences/College of Biotechnology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Rua Carballo Calero, Campus Lugo, Lugo, Spain for supporting the research and to the Algerian Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation, University of Oran 1 Ahmed BEN BELLA.


This work was funded by the International Cooperation project for the development (AECID) entitled “Selection and characterization of lactic acid bacteria producing antimicrobial substances and their exploitation as bio-ingredients for the bio-preservation of food”. Sponsored by Inter-university cooperation program “Mediterranean ICP” between Algeria and Spain. type C/030828/10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors contributed in this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanane Fatma Chentouf.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chentouf, H.F., Rahli, F., Benmechernene, Z. et al. 16S rRNA gene sequencing and MALDI TOF mass spectroscopy identification of Leuconostoc mesenteroides isolated from Algerian raw camel milk. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 21, 51 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • 16S rRNA gene sequencing
  • Leuconostoc mesenteroides
  • Algerian raw camel milk