Skip to main content

Comparison of matK and rbcL DNA barcodes for genetic classification of jewel orchid accessions in Vietnam

Abstract

Background

Jewel orchid is the common name of several orchid species which can be alike in morphological characteristics, but variable in medicinal properties. At present, two DNA barcode loci, namely, maturase K (matK) and ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL), are intensively utilized for plant identification. However, the discrimination effectiveness of these loci is variable among plant species. This study was carried out to compare the identifying efficacy of these two loci on jewel orchid population collected throughout Vietnam.

Results

The results revealed that 21 jewel orchid accessions studied were segregated into four different species with significant variations. The discrimination power of matK and rbcL markers in this jewel orchid study displayed different efficiency level. The rbcL gene has higher distinguishing potential than either matK gene alone or the combination of both genes.

Conclusion

The findings of this project could provide valuable information that is necessary for classification, plant origin identification, breeding, and conservation program of jewel orchid in Vietnam.

Background

The term “jewel orchid” refers to several species of orchid of velvety brocade-like leaves with beautiful veins. They belong to a diverse plant group of Orchidaceae family which spread widely in tropical regions of Asia and Australia, and have high medicinal and economic values. As traditional medicine, jewel orchid is used to treat chest and abdominal pain, diabetes, nephritis, fever, hypertension, liver, and pleurisy. Several chemical compounds have been identified by advanced analytics methods to show strong biological activity which can improve the lung and liver conditions [1].

Several jewel orchid species may share nearly similar morphological characteristics although their economic and pharmaceutical values are very different. Therefore, an accurate classification of this orchid group of high medicinal properties as a basis for development and conservation is urgently needed. However, the current plant identification is still using the traditional classification method: rely on the morphological characteristics of leaves, flowers, and stems. There are some problems encountered from applying this method, such as nearly identical external morphology features, variable polymorphisms between adult and juvenile stages, and environmental factors as well as the plant growth development phases; all leads to inaccuracy. Also, morphological identification cannot be performed properly if the specimen has been damaged or has been subjected to preliminary processing. Applying the incorrect species with different pharmaceutical compounds as herbal medicine would reduce the effectiveness of the medicine, and could be harmful to the patients.

Recently, DNA barcode is increasingly becoming a more popular method to identify species, utilizing reliable DNA regions. It is used worldwide to serve the classification, biodiversity assessment, and genetic resource conservation, and also to overcome the limitation of morphology-based taxonomy. As a relatively new technique, DNA barcode uses the standardized genomic regions to distinguish among species and has been used intensively for identifying at species level. In animals, the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene was generally used for phylogenetic study. However; the same gene cannot be employed in plants, as it lacks sufficient variations due to low mutation rate [2]. For plants, other gene regions have been utilized as DNA barcodes, such as nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed space (ITS) [3, 4], also rbcL, matK, atpF-atpH, psbK-psbI, and trnH-psbA [5,6,7].

In Orchidaceae family, DNA barcode has been used intensively to species identification or classification. Kim and colleagues developed DNA barcodes for 89 orchid species in Korea [5]. A study using rbcL, matK, ITS, and trnH-psbA barcodes was also effective for identification of endangered orchid in Paphiopedilum species in Malaysia [7]. In Vietnam, Huynh and colleagues employed up to nine DNA barcodes to discover the species diversity of six jewel orchid accessions [8]. A large study in China has screened 1698 accessions of 184 Dendrobium species with 11 candidate barcodes, and then proposed that due to the easiness in amplification and sequencing, the primer sets suitable for Dendrobium orchid study were ITS, ITS2, matK, rbcL, and trnH-pbsA [6].

Among several barcode loci, matK and rbcL were proposed as the preferred plant barcoding loci by The Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) [9]. Nevertheless, the ideal locus for DNA barcoding of plants remains debatable, since some loci are efficient for some specific taxonomic groups only and the species discrimination of these genes varies among plant species. When studied Aquilaria genus, Thitikornpong and colleagues discovered more variation in matK gene in comparison to rbcL gene [10]; similar result has also been found in phylogenetic analysis of Dalbergia [11]. A variation of species resolution in different vascular plant species was exhibited by both rbcL and matK [12], whereas rbcL has better performance in teak, black rosewook, ben teak [13], and also liverwort [14]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the species resolution ability of matK and rbcL loci in 21 accessions jewel orchid collected in Vietnam. The obtained results will be useful for genetic conservation and breeding purposes. Furthermore, the markers that are found to be tightly linked to specific accessions will also pave the way for classification, conservation, and protection of this plant group.

Methods

A total of 21 jewel orchid accessions were collected from different places in Vietnam (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The leaf samples were dried in silica gel and stored at room temperature until usage.

Fig. 1
figure1

Targeted areas for collecting jewel accessions in this study (sample numbers collected in each location are indicated in parentheses)

Table 1 Jewel orchid samples collected for genetic characterization and the corresponding accession numbers

DNA was extracted with CTAB method (cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) as described by Doyle and Doyle [15]. PCR reaction for matK and rbcL regions was amplified using the composition as follows: 7.5 μL 2X Mytaq Mix (Bioline, UK), 20 ng DNA, 0.2 μM primer (either matK 390F: 5′-CGATCTATTCATTCAATATTTC-3′; and 1326R: 5′-TCTAGCACACGAAAGTCGAAGT-3′ [16] or rbcL: cF: 5′-TGAAAACGTGAATTCCCAACCGTTTATGCG-3′; cR: 5′-GCAGCAGCTAGTTCCGGGCTCCA-3′ [17], and PCR water (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) to final volume of 15 μL. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min; then 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C. Finally, an additional of 5 min was continued at 72 °C to complete the reaction. All reactions were carried out in SureCycler 8800 Thermal Cycler (Agilent, USA). The PCR products were electrophorized on 1% agarose gel using 1 kb DNA marker (Bioline, UK) to confirm the amplification length. The PCR products were then purified by ISOLATE II PCR and Gel Kit (Bioline, UK) and sequenced using the BigDyeTM Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystem, USA). The products were next run on ABI 3100 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystem, USA). The obtained electropherograms were edited using FinchTV (Digital World Biology Products, USA). Only the sequences with scores higher than 20 PHRED score were considered for further analysis. Sequences were trimmed at both ends of the alignment in order to avoid too many missing data at the ends. The obtained sequences were submitted to GenBank (NCBI, USA) and are publicly accessible under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

For species identification, the DNA sequences were identified with Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) system in the function of rbcL and matK for plants. Similarly, the homology of matK and rbcL sequences was checked simultaneously with Basic Local Alignment Search Tools (BLAST) of NCBI using default parameters. The identification was deemed correct if the highest identity percentage of searched sequences was derived from expected species or genus. On the other hand, the identification was considered ambiguous when the highest identity percentage of searched sequences was not derived from expected species or genus or family [18]. DNA sequences were then aligned with the ClustalW algorithm, implemented in MEGA7 package [19], using the default parameters. Evolutionary divergence for each data set and pattern of nucleotide substitution were performed on the same software. Evolutionary trees were constructed based on two methods: maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor joining (NJ), each represents for discrete character methods and distance methods, respectively [20]. The reliability of phylogenetic analysis was validated by 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap support (BS) was categorized as strong (> 85%), moderate (70-85%), weak (50-69%), or poor (< 50%) [21].

In order to estimate species resolution for a given barcode locus, we considered the species were resolved if conspecific individual grouped into one monophyletic branch in the phylogenetic tree with strong bootstrap support. On the other hand, if conspecific individuals were separated in paraphyletic branches, then it was considered as identification failure [22]. The correlation between the matK and rbcL similarity matrices were computed by Mantel test at a significant level of 5% in 1000 simulations by using program Mantel test of Microsoft Excel 2010 [23].

Results

Species identification

In this study, both matK and rbcL sequences were successfully sequenced. For homologous identification, only sequences of minimum 80% percentage identity were considered. Using BLAST, both matK and rbcL genes were showing identical results as described in Table 2.

Table 2 Searching result of matK and rbcL gen on Genbank and BOLD databases

Using BLAST for searching homology, the results of matK and rbcL are identical. On the contrary, the results from BOLD were totally different and the returned species from this database were not corresponding to those of BLAST. Furthermore, the obtained results from matK and rbcL by BOLD were also not consistent. MatK sequences show higher similarity to that of BLAST with 7/21 accessions with identical results. Nevertheless, none of returned results from rbcL was identical to that of BLAST. Even more, several returned identifications were completely irrelevant to jewel orchid. Limited accessions were shown as belonged to other genus in Orchidaceae family, such as Platythelys querceticola or Cephalanthera falcata forma. In particular, LD1 and HCM accessions were shown as belonged to two genuses in Cucurbitaceae family: Nothoalsomitra suberosa and Cucumis sativus, respectively.

Estimation of sequence divergence

The divergence among sequences is slightly variable (Supplementary table S1). Among which, the divergence value of matK and rbcL regions was ranged from 0 to 0.14 and from 0 to 0.05, respectively. In matK region, PY2 accession showed a higher difference from those of other species, which vary from 0.09 to 0.14; whereas rbcL from HG accession showed the highest divergence, which vary from 0.0 to 0.05. The substitution of different bases in analyzed regions was evaluated on entire codon positions (1st+ 2nd + 3rd nucleotide) and was displayed in Table 3. In general, the transitional substitution is higher than the transversional substitution in both matK and rbcL regions. However, matK region exhibited a higher substitution rate from G to A. In contrast, the changing frequency from C to T, T to C, and A to G of rbcL was higher than that of matK.

Table 3 Pattern of nucleotide substitution of matK and rbcL regions (in percentage)

Furthermore, two parameters were utilized to examine the inter-specific divergence; consisted of average inter-specific distance and range of inter-specific distance. Another two parameters, namely, average intra-specific distance and range of intra-specific distance, were used to evaluate the intra-specific divergence. The obtained results revealed that matK possessed the higher intraspecific distance and lower interspecific distance (Table 4).

Table 4 Estimates of average evolutionary divergence of matK and rbcL sequences

Phylogenetic analyses

By employing ML, 21 accessions were successfully classified into five separate groups, which were also corresponding to the five species identified by BLAST (Table 2). However, when utilizing NJ, only four species: Anoetochilius pingbianeisis, Goodyere velunitna, Goodyera schlechtendalinana, and Anoectochilus roxburghii, were correctly grouped, while the remaining accessions belonging to Ludisia discolor were divided into two subgroups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Phylogenetic tree based on rbcL region of 21 jewel orchid accessions by maximum likelihood (A) and neighbor joining (B). The value in horizontal bar explains the length of the branch, which represents the number of nucleotide substitution

In contrast to rbcL region, phylogenetic analysis of matK was failed to show any clear grouping for both ML and NJ analysis (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Phylogenetic tree based on matK region of 21 jewel orchid accessions by maximum likelihood (A) and neighbor joining (B). The value in horizontal bar explains the length of the branch, which representing the number of nucleotide substitution

The combination of two barcode regions was unsuccessful to increase the species power resolution compared to the single use. The phylogenetic tree was resulted in one and two separate branches when using ML and NJ methods, respectively (Fig. 4). Mantel’s test also failed to find the relatedness between matK and rbcL barcodes with P value = 0.883.

Fig. 4
figure4

Phylogenetic tree based on the combination of matK and rbcL sequences of 21 jewel orchid accessions by maximum likelihood (A) and neighbor joining (B)

Discussion

Species identification

Although numerous studies mentioned the low sequencing effectiveness of matK region in vascular plants in the comparison to rbcL [24], no problem was encountered on our DNA sequencing of both genes. The BLAST results were consistent in searching for homology of both matK and rbcL genes. On the other hand, the BOLD results were totally different. The low accuracy of BOLD could be originated from the small size and insufficient completeness of their database. Consequently, the missing species in the database cannot be identified and the method may assign the query sequence to an incorrect species [25]. Similar result was previously reported on Chenopodium murale [26]. Their study reported that when using BLAST, the specimen was identified as Chenopodium murale for both matK and rbcL gene with 100% sequence similarity. Whereas when using BOLD, rbcL gene showed high similarity, ranged from 96.3 to 100% with different species such as C. ambrosiodies, C. album, and C. ficifolium.

Estimation of sequence divergence

In molecular evolution study, estimation of nucleotide substitution is vital to show the presence of genetic divergence. In our study, the divergence value of matK and rbcL regions ranged from 0 to 0.14 and 0 to 0.05, respectively. This value is significantly lower than previous data reported by Sikdar and colleagues when analyzing 46 rbcL sequences and 42 matK sequences of 21 species in Fabaceae family [22]. Higher divergence of matK marker has been widely reported and made matK being considered as highly potential barcoding regions for systematic and evolution study in plants [27]. For example, matK was proved to be more divergent than rbcL at both intra-specificity and inter-specificity in a study of the rbcL and matK region effectiveness for 490 vascular plant species [12].

Two parameters in this study were utilized to examine the inter-specific divergence: average inter-specific distance and range of inter-specific distance. Another two parameters were used to evaluate intra-specific divergence, namely, average intra-specific distance, and range of intra-specific distance. In general, a desirable barcode gene should have high inter-specific divergence and low intra-specific divergence; thus, rbcL is superior to matK in this jewel orchid study. A study on several medical plants also revealed that rbcL has lowest intra-specific distance in the comparison to other common barcode regions in plant study such as ITS, ITS2, psbA-trnH, ycf5, and rpoC1 [28]. Ideally, the interspecific distance value of DNA barcode should be higher than that of intraspecific distance to produce non-overlapping value or “barcoding gap,” which in turn will increase the discrimination power of barcode in classification study. However, the barcode gap is absent in this study, suggesting that the studied species are closely related.

Phylogenetic analyses

The resolution capacity of a barcode is its ability to differentiate and identify species based on interspecific differences among DNA sequences. A species is considered as resolved if its individuals construct a specific monophyletic branch. The result shows that ML is more effective in species classification of jewel orchid. Although both ML and NJ are commonly used in phylogenetic analysis, NJ can be easily performed in a short time with personal computer while ML is considered as professional method in phylogenetic analysis. ML could consider the possibility for all events happening simultaneously and produced the best tree, supported at higher probability in comparison to other methods [29]. In which the homologous variations from alignment results will be focused. This method has been used to identify several plants such as Epimedium elatum [30].

The evolution of matK region is considered as the fastest in plastid genome and the sequence is highly similar to COI sequence in animal which is commonly used as key barcode region in animal identification. However, in contrast to rbcL region, phylogenetic analysis of matK did not show any clear group for both ML and NJ analysis. This is also supported by Mantel’s test. Numerous studies have been reported superiority of rbcL in plant classification such as in Palmae family [24]; Codiaeum varieagatum [18]; and Ranunculaceae family [31]. Similarly, when Maloukh and colleagues studied the discriminatory power for authentication purpose of DNA barcode on 51 plant species in United Arab Emirates, rbcL successfully identified 100% (51/51) plant species including 11 monocots and 40 eudicots plant, whereas matK resulted in only 24.45% (14/51) of correct species identification [32]. Different DNA barcode markers could affect the resulted phylogenetic tree. A study in Dipterocarpaceae family has shown inconsistency of the phylogenetic tree built by rbcL and matK genes [33]. Another study on Casuarinaceae found that matK gene gave higher resolution than rbcL [34]. A research group in Vietnam also reported that matK region was a more reliable marker than rbcL on Hopea chinesis [35].

The combination of multi loci barcodes could improve the species classification [9] and several studies have proven this idea [35,36,37]. In our study, however, the combination of two barcode region failed to increase the species differentiation power compared to the single one. Previous researches on different trees also reported this phenomenon. For example, a 2019 study on Ranunculanceae family in China showed that the combination of matK and rbcL showed lower species resolution in contrast to rbcL alone for both ML and NJ analysis [31].

Conclusion

Both matK and rbcL barcode loci could be used as a complementary tool for jewel orchid identification; however, the effectiveness of each locus should be examined adequately case by case. The combination of two barcode regions was not better than the single one. The results suggest that the discrimination of rbcL locus is superior to matK locus. Future studies combined with additional barcode loci are necessary to develop a better and more effective differentiation method among different species of jewel orchid.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ITS:

Internal transcribed space

COI:

Cytochrome oxidase I

matK :

Maturase K

rbcL :

Ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

CTAB:

Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide

BOLD:

Barcode of Life Database

BLAST:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tools

ML:

Maximum likelihood

NJ:

Neighbor joining

References

  1. 1.

    Chung HH, Shi SK, Huang B, Chen JT (2017) Enhanced agronomic traits and medicinal constituents of autotetraploids in Anoectochilus formosanus Hayata, a top-grade medicinal orchid. Molecules 22(11):1907. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janze DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(23):8369–8374. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503123102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Le SC, Wang CH, Yen CH, Chang C (2017) DNA barcode and identification of the varieties and provenances of Taiwan’s domestic and imported made teas using ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 sequences. J Food Drug Anal 25(2):260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.008 Epub 2016 Jul 30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhu S, Li Q, Chen S, Wang Y, Zhou L, Zeng C, Dong J (2018) Phylogenetic analysis of Uncaria species based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and ITS2 secondary structure. Pharm Biol 56(1):548–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2018.1499780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim HM, Oh SH, Bhandari GS, Kim CS, Park CW (2014) DNA barcoding of Orchidaceae in Korea. Mol Ecol Resour 14(3):499–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Xu S, Li D, Li J, Xiang X, Jin W, Huang W, Jin X, Huang L (2015) Evaluation of the DNA barcodes in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) from Mainland Asia. PLoS ONE 10(1):e0115168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rajaram MC, Yong CS, Gansau JA, Go R (2019) DNA barcode of endangered Paphiopedilum species (Orchidaceae) of Peninsular Malaysia. Phytotaxa 387(2):94–104. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.387.2.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Huynh HD, Nguyen TG, Duong HX, Ha TL, Phan DY, Tran TT, Do DG (2019) Using some DNA barcode for the genetic analysis and identifying some species of Anoectochilus spp. Can Tho Uni J Sci 55(1):14–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S. A 106(31):12794–12797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Thitikornpong W, Palanuvej C, Ruangrungsi N (2018) DNA barcoding for authentication of the endangered plants in genus Aquilaria. Thai J Pharm Sci 42(4):214–220

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Li Q, Wu J, Wang Y, Lian X, Wu F, Zhou L, Huan Z, Zhu S (2017) The phylogenetic analysis of Dalbergia (Fabaceae: Papilionaceae) based on different DNA barcodes. Holzforschung 71(12):939–949. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2017-0052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Saarela JM, Sokoloff PC, Gillespie LJ, Consaul LL, Bull RD (2013) DNA barcoding the Canadian Arctic Flora: core plastid barcodes (rbcL + matK) for 490 vascular plant species. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fatima T, Srivastava A, Somashekar PV, Hanur VS, Rao MS (2019) Development of DNA-based species identification and barcoding of three important timbers. Bull Natl Res Cent 43(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0116-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hollingsworth ML, Clark AA, Forrest LL, Richardson J, Pennington RT, Long DG, Cowan R, Chase MW, Gaudeul M, Hollinsworth P (2009) Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants. Mol Ecol Resour 9(2):439–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02439.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical bulletin 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cuenoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, Powell M, Grayer RJ, Chase MW (2020) Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Bot 89(1):132–144. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.1.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hasebe M, Omori T, Nakazawa M, Sano T, Kato M, Iwatsuki K (1994) rbcL gene sequences provide evidence for the evolutionary lineages of leptosporangiate ferns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91(12):5730–5734. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.12.5730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nio SA, Kolondam BJ, Talei TK (2018) Evaluation of matK and rbcL genes as markers in DNA barcoding of Codiaeum variegatum (L.) Blume. Biosci Res 15(1):192–198

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peteron D, Filpski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30(12):2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kang Y, Deng Z, Zang R, Long W (2017) DNA barcoding analysis and phylogenetic relationships of tree species in tropical cloud forests. Sci Rep 7(1):12564. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13057-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kress WJ, Prince LM, Williams KJ (2002) The phylogeny and a new classification of the gingers (Zingiberaceae): evidence from molecular data. Am J Bot 89(10):1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.10.1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sikdar S, Tiwari S, Thakur VV, Sapre S (2018) An in silico approach for evaluation of rbcL and matK loci for DNA barcoding of Fabaceae family. Int J Chem Stud 6(6):2446–2451

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27(2):209–220

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Naeem A, Khan AA, Cheema HMN, Khan IA, Buerkert A (2014) DNA barcoding for species identification in the Palmae family. Genet Mol Res 13(4):10341–10348. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.December.4.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Parmentier I, Duminil J, Kuzmina M, Philippe M, Thomas DW, Kenfack D, Chuyong GB, Cruaud C, Hardy OJ (2013) How effective are DNA barcodes in the identification of African rainforest trees? PloS One 8(4):e54921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bafeel SO, Arif IA, Al-Homaidan AA, Khan HA, Ahamed A, Bakir M (2012) Assessment of DNA barcoding for the identification of Chenopodium murale L. (Chenopodiaceae). Int J Biol 4(4):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S (2006) DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Can J Bot 84(3):335–341. https://doi.org/10.1139/b06-047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Gao T, Pang X, Luo K, Li Y, Li X, Jia X, Lin Y, Leon C (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 5(1):e8613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17(6):368–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lone SA, Hassan QP, Gupta S (2019) Development of DNA barcode for rapid identification of Epimedium elatum (Morren & Decne) from Northwestern Himalayas in India. J Appl Res Med Aroma 13:100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2019.100205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Li Q, Wang X, Wang J, Su N, Zhang L, Ma Y, Chang Z, Zhao L, Potter D (2019) Efficient identification of Pulsatilla (Ranunculaceae) using DNA barcodes and micro-morphological characters. Front Plant Sci 10:1196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Maloukh L, Kumrappan A, Jarrar M, Salehi J, El-wakil H, Lakshimi TVR (2017) Discriminatory power of rbcL barcode locus for authentication of some of United Arab Emirates (UAE) native plants. 3 Biotech 7(2):144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0746-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Harnelly E, Thomy Z, Fathiya R (2018) Phylogenetic analysis of Dipterocarpaceae in Ketambe Research Station, Gunung Leuser National Park (Sumatra, Indonesia) based on rbcL and matK genes. Biodiversitas 19(3):1074–1080. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sogo A, Setoguchi H, Noguchi J, Jaffre T, Tobe H (2001) Molecular phylogeny of Casuarinaceae based on rbcL and matK gene sequences. J Plant Res 114(4):459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00014011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Trang NTP, Duc NM, Sinh NV, Triest L (2015) Application of DNA barcoding markers to the identification of Hopea species. Genet Mol Res 14(3):9181–9190. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.August.7.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Burgess KS, Fazekas AJ, Kesanakurti PR, Graham SW, Husband BC, Newsmaster SG, Percy DM, Hajibabaei M, Barrett SCH (2011) Discriminating plant species in a local temperate flora using the rbcL+ matK DNA barcode. Methods Ecol Evol 2(4):333–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00092.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ismail M, Ahmad A, Nadeem M, Javed MA, Khan SH, Khawaish I, Sthanadar AA, Qari SH, Alghnem SM, Khan KA, Khan MF, Qamer S (2020) Development of DNA barcodes for selected Acacia species by using rbcL and matK DNA markers. Saudi J Biol Sci 27(12):3735–3742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Faculty of Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh City of Food Industry for providing research facilities.

Funding

This work has been sponsored and funded by Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry under Contract No. 143/HD-DCT.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VTH designed experiment, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; TKPT collected samples, performed experiments, and analyzed data; TTTV performed experiments; SW analyzed data and wrote manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viet The Ho.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This study used jewel orchid accessions collected from public organizations in Vietnam such as Universities, research centres, nursery, and no permission for sample collection was required.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary table S1

. Estimates of Evolutionary Divergence between DNA barcode Sequences. (The number of base substitutions per site from between sequences of matK and rbcL regions is shown below and above the diagonal, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ho, V.T., Tran, T.K.P., Vu, T.T.T. et al. Comparison of matK and rbcL DNA barcodes for genetic classification of jewel orchid accessions in Vietnam. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19, 93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00188-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • DNA barcode
  • Genetic diversity
  • Jewel orchid
  • matK
  • rbcL