Skip to main content

Genetic variations in Turkey cultivar and ecotype Medicago sativa species: cytological, total protein profile, and molecular characterization

Abstract

Background

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a perennial plant, which is high in nutritional value and resistant to environmental conditions, and it is one of most frequently preferred feed crop among the leguminous family. In this study, it was aimed to determine the genetic diversity of some alfalfa ecotypes and their varieties by DNA, protein, nucleus, and chromosome counts. The genetic distance between the populations of control (M. truncatula), five different cultivars (Alsancak, Bilensoy, Iside, Plato, Bilensoy82), and three different ecotypes (Erzurum, Muş, and Konya) was investigated by cytogenetic analysis, flow cytometry, simple sequence repeats (SSR), and SDS PAGE techniques.

Results

Cytogenetic analysis of these tested plants has verified the existence of expected levels such as diploid, triploid, and tetraploid as well as aneuploid (2n = 4x = 30) plants. Flow cytometry analysis have displayed that all of tested plants were tetraploid, whereas cytological analysis had either diploid, triploid, or tetraploid. Genetic diversity dendrogram was created using Erzurum, Muş, Konya, Bilensoy82, Alsancak, and Plato varieties. The Iside and Bilensoy were found to be morphogenetic in relationship. Our control plant, M. truncatula, did not have a similarity relationship with other ecotypes and cultivars. The total numbers of protein bands differed among tested plants from 140 kDA to 25 kDa.

Conclusions

This paper first reports on the genetic variation of Turkish alfalfa plants by using detailed analysis techniques. This work provides important findings for the classification, conservation, and innovation of alfalfa germplasm resources.

Background

Alfalfa is an important perennial and cross-pollinated forage crop of the family Fabaceae grown all over the world [1]. It has a rich and long history and is one of the earliest crops domesticated by humans [2]. Alfalfa is the main forage crop for dairy producers of many agricultural regions due to its high feeding value. Alfalfa is cultivated for its high yield and environment adaptation, wide disease tolerance, and nutritional feeding quality, as well as its role on nitrogen fixation, wildlife habitat, soil conservation, and bioremediation. Medicago species have a wide natural distribution that covers Asia, Europe, and Africa [3, 4]. Its conventional classification is based on seed structures and other important characteristics including leaves, cotyledons, ploidy level, organ hairness, and growth habit [5]. The cultivated ones include diploid and tetraploid forms of M. sativa L., M. sativa subsp. sativa, M. sativa subsp. falcata, and M. sativa subsp. glutinosa [5], which are all perennial plants. Medicago species are either diploids (2n = 2x = 16), tetraploids (2n = 4x = 32), or hexaploids (2n = 6x = 48). Alfalfa is the most polymorphic species, which is a trait of great importance in taxonomic studies. Taxonomy depends mostly on morphology to discriminate groups. Morphological features are widely characterized by flower colors and pod shapes. M. sativa subsp. sativa has purple color flowers and coiled pods and is less cold resistant than M. sativa subsp. falcata or yellow sickle shaped pods and their hybrid progeny with mixed color flowers and partially coiled pods. The perennial Medicago species have a basic chromosome number of x=8 [6]. These species are both diploid and tetraploid, self-crossed, and much more heterozygous. They are also less resistant against abiotic and biotic stress factors. The genetic variation of alfalfa has been determined using morphological features [7], protein markers [8], chromosome number, and molecular markers consisting of RAPDs [9], AFLPs [10, 11], and simple-sequence repeat markers (SSRs) [1, 12]. Flow cytometry is a useful method of plant varieties that identifies ploidy level and analyzes the chromosome number. It has been characterized as a rapid tool for assessing the ploidy level of alfalfa accessions [13]. Chromosome number analysis has been evident to be an important tool for classification and releasing chromosome origin events. The basic principle of cytological analysis is to determine classification and assessment of basic chromosome number of closely related species or other related ones. SSR markers have been used extensively for the development of new varieties diversity studies. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are highly reproducible, co-dominantly inherited, and abundant markers in genomes that can be analyzed using PCR-based techniques. They have provided species-specific allele patterns in alfalfa and can be useful markers for determining the genetic variation and the differences between plant varieties [14]. It has been shown that SSR can be used to identify genetic variations and to characterize the genetic similarities among cultivars in alfalfa. Although agronomic traits methods have provided significant successes in taxonomic studies, these methods have still some restrictions because of closely related populations and species for germplasm. Molecular marker and cytogenetics techniques can considerably provide more information about chromosome number, genome size, and base pair. The aim of this study is to evaluate the genetic diversity and ploidy levels by using SSR marker, SDS PAGE, chromosome number, and flow cytometry analysis of eight alfalfa varieties. Moreover, it is also thought to be an important material for the improvement of new cultivars through breeding studies in the future.

Methods

Plant material

Control (M. truncatula); five alfalfa cultivars, Bilensoy, Bilensoy82, Alsancak, Plato, and Iside; and three alfalfa ecotypes, Erzurum, Konya, and Muş were used as the plant materials for this study. All cultivars used were obtained from the Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics at Kafkas University. Five alfalfa cultivars were registered by the East Anatolia Agricultural Research Institute Erzurum, Turkey.

All ecotypes used were provided from local farmers of Erzurum, Muş, and Konya cities. Alfalfa seeds were obtained in water agar. They were maintained at 25/27 °C (day/night) growth chamber with a 16 h day length for 8 days to initiate seedling. After 2 weeks, the leaves of plants were collected from cultivars and ecotypes for further analysis.

Chromosome counting

In the mitotic chromosome analysis, 10 alfalfa seeds were planted in each petri dishes. After 3 days, 1.5 cm roots were cut with a scalpel. It was stored in 0.05% colchicine in glass tubes at room temperature for approximately 3 h. It was then left to wash for 3 h. Then, it was left in fixative (3:1, ethanol: 45% acetic acid) for 3 h at room temperature. Then, it was kept in a 60 °C bath for 10 min in 1 N NaOH in hydrolysis. Hematoxylin was kept at room temperature for 10 h. It is then passed through dh2O 3 times. Zeiss Axiophot microscope was used and samples were analyzed in three replicates [15].

Flow cytometry

Nuclear DNA content of alfalfa varieties were analyzed using fresh plant materials by flow cytometry. Genome size analysis was determined by using 3 replicates. Commercial kits (CyStain PI absolute P) of Partec were used in nuclear DNA content analysis. A slightly modified version of the Partec protocol was carried out in the analyses. Hordeum vulgare “Cervoise” (2 pg/2C) was obtained as a reference standard. Shortly, the protocol consisted of simultaneously chopping leaf tissues (20 mg each) of Alfalfa and Hordeum vulgare “Cervoise” as a control in 0.5 mL nuclei extraction buffer, transferring homogenized tissues into centrifuge tubes through filter, brief centrifugation (20 s), dissolving the pellet in extraction buffer (0.5 mL), adding staining buffer (1 mL), and incubation (30 min) at room temperature. The samples were then analyzed using a Partec CyFlow Space flow cytometer (Munster, Germany) equipped with green laser excitation at 488 nm. The absolute DNA contents of Alfalfa varieties were calculated based on the ratios of the G1 peak means of sample and reference standard by using the following formula:

$$ \mathrm{Sample}\ 2\mathrm{C}\ \mathrm{DNA}\ \mathrm{content}=\frac{\mathrm{sample}\ \mathrm{G}1\ \mathrm{peak}\ \mathrm{mean}}{standard\ G1\ mean}\mathrm{x}2\mathrm{C}\ \mathrm{DNA}\ \mathrm{content}\ \left(\mathrm{pg}\right) $$

Nuclear DNA content values were calculated as pg by using formulas. The c values of the species were compared using t test.

SSR

Total genomic DNA was purified following CTAB method with slight modifications [16]. Eleven primer pairs detecting SSR loci in M. sativa L. as described by Erayman et al. [17] were used in the amplification reactions. PCR reactions were applied in a 50-μl volume consisting of (200 ng) 1 μL genomic DNA, 4 μL of dNTPs, 5 μL of 10x buffer, 0.5 μL BioVan Taq pol (5 U), 1 μL each primer, and 37.5 μL of ddH2O. The cycling conditions for the PCR reaction were as follows: 95 °C for 45 s, 58 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C final extension for 30 cycles. The PCR products were electrophoresed and visualized using a 1% (w/v) agarose gel.

Total proteins analysis

For alfalfa total protein isolation, 0.03 g of leaf sample was weighed. It was taken into 2 mL Eppendorf tube and homogenized by adding 200 μL sample buffer sample. It was kept in a water bath at 100 °C for 3 min. It was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant portion was transferred to another 2 mL Eppendorf tube. Later, a standard graphic was created using the Bradford method (Table 1). In the equation created in the standard graph, the values of the protein samples are in the ordinate part (M. truncatula 0.6105, Bilensoy 0.6048, Iside 0.5181, Erzurum 0.6065, Muş 0.6316, Konya 0.6107, Bilensoy82 0.5222, Plato 0.4519, Alsancak 0.5053). Twenty micrograms of the protein was separated in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate [18].

Table 1 Standard plot of Bradford protein

Statistical analysis

The data were scored as presence of band (1) and absence of band (0) for the SSR results. To identify the genetic diversity, the observed number of alleles (na), effective number of alleles (ne), Nei’s gene diversity (he), and Shannon’s information index (I) were calculated using POPGENE v1.31 [19]. A relation of similarity between varieties was calculated according to Nei (1973). A UPGMA tree was constructed using NTSYS v2.02 [20].

Results

Chromosome number and ploidy level

Of eight varieties tested, the three varieties were found to be entirely diploid with basic chromosome number 2n = 2x = 16 (Iside, Bilensoy, and Muş). Only Bilensoy82 was found to be triploid with basic chromosome number 2n = 3x = 24. Four varieties were found to be tetraploid (Alsancak, Plato, Erzurum, and Konya) with basic chromosome number 2n = 4x = 32. Although Erzurum and Konya varieties were detected to be tetraploid, basic chromosome numbers were detected as 2n = 4x = 30 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chromosome numbers analysis of alfalfa varieties using microscopy. Representative of the ploidy levels of varieties. a Iside 2n = 2x = 16. b Muş 2n = 2x = 16. c Bilensoy 2n = 2x = 16. d Bilensoy82 2n = 3x = 24. e Alsancak 2n = 4x = 32. f Plato 2n = 4x = 32. g Erzurum 2n = 4x = 30. h Konya 2n = 4x = 30

Nuclear DNA content

The nuclear DNA content of the tested varieties ranged from 3.71 pg in Bilensoy82 to 3.92 pg in Plato, which is a tetraploid 2n = 4x = 32. Nuclear DNA content was 3.81 pg for Muş, 3.80 pg for Konya, and 3.75 pg for Erzurum, respectively, whereas the Alsancak, Iside, and Bilensoy cultivars exhibited a value of 3.79 pg, 3.85 pg, and 3.87 pg. There was no intraspecific diversity in nuclear DNA content among tested. Overall, the tested varieties demonstrated a small different value of nuclear DNA content (Table 2, Fig. 2).

Table 2 Nuclear DNA content of alfalfa varieties
Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow cytometric analysis of PI stained nuclei alfalfa using Hordeum vulgare “Cervoise” as control. a Alsancak, b Bilensoy, c Bilensoy82, d Erzurum, e Iside, f Konya, g Muş, h Plato

Marker analysis

From the alfalfa marker databases, we chose 11 SSR markers with transferability present on the genomes of Medicago truncatula [17]. The 11 SSR markers successfully generated 50 bands resulting in 22 alleles on the genomes of 8 alfalfa varieties and 1 control plant. The PIC values ranged from 0.1800 (mtic238) to 0.3700 (mtic248). Therefore, the greatest genetic knowledge was obtained from mtic441 and mtic471, while the least was from mtic238-mtic248 (Table 3). The highest numbers of polymorphic bands (17) were generated from mtic230, while the lowest (1 for each) were obtained from mtic238 and mtic248. Using 11 SSR markers, the observed number of alleles, effective number of alleles, gene variation values, Shannon’s information index, and number of total bands were also assessed for the varieties plants used in this study. According to those values, the least value was observed from primers mtic238 and mtic248 while the greatest was observed from mtic441 and mtic471 while the lowest was from mtic238 (Table 4). In terms of similarity matrix, we constructed a dendrogram in which similarity coefficients ranged from 0.32 to 0.85 for all varieties (Table 3). The dendrogram was composed of two main groups in which M. truncatula was separated from the alfalfa varieties (Fig. 3). In the first main group (B), varieties were in the IB subgroup composed of Muş and Erzurum ecotypes. In the second, varieties were in the IIB composed of varieties Konya, Bilensoy82, Alsancak, and Plato. In the last subgroup, varieties were in the IIIB composed of Iside and Bilensoy (Fig. 3).

Table 3 Genetic similarity for 9 varieties of alfalfa
Table 4 Different genetic variations estimates for 11 transferability primers used in this study
Fig. 3
figure 3

Dendrogram involving genetic diversity between 5 alfalfa cultivars, 3 ecotypes, and control (M. truncatula)

Total proteins analysis

Total protein isolated from leaves of 8 varieties were subjected to 10% SDS PAGE analysis. The amounts of total protein molecular weight were observed in all tested samples at 40 kDa expected sizes. According to the band intensity results, the highest protein levels were observed for M. truncatula, Alsancak, and Konya varieties. The lowest protein levels were observed for Plato and Bilensoy82 varieties (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

SDS PAGE profiles of total proteins from 5 alfalfa varieties, 3 ecotypes, and control (M. truncatula). M, marker (kDa); 1: M. truncatula, 2: Bilensoy, 3: Plato, 4: Alsancak, 5: İside, 6: Bilensoy82, 7: Konya, 8: Erzurum, 9: Muş

Discussion

Genetic variations and conservations are vital for economically important crops such as M. sativa L., onobrychis, and aegilops [1, 21]. The high variability of M. sativa L. species and the events of inter- and intra-specific diversity result in the expansion of its genetic variations. However, the identification of species based on agronomic traits can be misleading and might cause complexities during evaluation of species data, taxonomic definition, multiplication, and germplasm conservation. Definition of accurate species is needed not only for taxonomical studies but also to allow the selection of closely related species for the introgression of morphological traits into Medicago species [22]. Turkey, along with central Asia, has been discovered as the primitive center of origin for alfalfa species due to extensive gene exchange between wild species of M. sativa L. varia and falcata species with the same chromosome number 2n = 4x = 32. Northeastern of Turkey has also been referred as the primary center of diversity for diploid plants. Turkish representatives of the alfalfa species contains purple flowers, coiled pods, yellow flowers, uncoiled pods, and intermediates and recombinants between purples flowers and yellow flowers [23]. Genetic variation and gene exchange are important markers for the determination of population genetic structure of natural population region [24]. In many regions of Turkey, highly polymorphous populations of alfalfa which came in various forms because of diploid and tetraploid varia cultivated adjacent to each other were encountered. Triploid varieties of alfalfa which came into presence through some gene flow between diploids and their tetraploids in Turkey are rarely found. Therefore, we investigated the relation between molecular markers, nuclear DNA contents, and ploidy levels in eight alfalfa varieties commonly grown in Turkey using comprehensive techniques. Ploidy levels in plants have been traditionally confirmed by chromosome numbers of stained root tips using microscopy; however, this method is time consuming, occasionally misleading, and insufficient for providing accurate data. Research in genetic variations in the ploidy level of alfalfa has been reported within accessions [1, 25]. In our first experiment, the tested varieties exhibited different levels of ploidy within accessions. Chromosome counting analysis demonstrated different chromosome number as diploid, triploid, or tetraploid with some deviations from these levels. A few studies that have shown deviated chromosome numbers were reported for Medicago species. These results are similar with one of the reports on Tunisian alfalfa population, Medicago sativa subsp. sativa, and Medicago sativa varia [1, 23]. However, the expected basic number was constantly observed in annual Medicago species from Algerian Fyad-Lameche et al. [26]. Chromosome number alterations between species of Medicago are critical to limiting crossing and gene flow by traditional hybridization. The deviation of expected chromosome numbers can be explained by aneuploidy, which plays an important role in genome evolution. Our results suggest that such relations among varieties indicate that the deviation numbers enclose 30 chromosomes instead of 32 chromosomes. For example, the Erzurum and Konya varieties were demonstrated to have similar levels in ploidy with basic chromosome number 2n = 4x = 30 (Fig. 1g, h). A count of 2n = 4x = 30 for two varieties probably is the outcome of aneuploid reduction, which presumably is the most common type by deletion of single or multiple chromosome. Aneuploid forms were also observed for alfalfa [23]. Similarly, the levels of chromosomes numbers affect not only hybridization but also its physiological and phenotypic traits. They intercross easily and generate viable fertiles because of their similar ploidy levels. These findings clearly indicate the type of aneuploid observed in this study. The two obtained varieties with chromosome number found to be 2n = 4x = 30 is in agreement with the finding of Lapina et al. [27]. Similar results were observed for the outcrossing and gene flow among different alfalfa varieties. It is likely that the level of ploidy is associated with the decreasing dysploidy of gene flow. Our observation in alfalfa suggests that the former might have derived the latter by reciprocal translocations, which resulted in most of the gene flow of one chromosome to transfer to another. In cytological studies, chromosome information is the main factor and helpful in supporting various species levels. Only Bilensoy82 was found to be triploid by traditional chromosome analysis among tested varieties (Fig. 1d). This variety is thought to be produced by crossing between 2n = 2x = 16 and 2n = 4x = 32. Triploid alfalfa varieties are less frequent. It increased through gene flow after hybridization of the unreduced gametes from the 2n = 2x = 16 to 2n = 4x = 32 in the genus and have strong male sterility due to chromosomal unbalance. Bilensoy82 was probably derivated through the formation of one unreduced gamete by a diploid parental plant being from same geographic region in Turkey. The encountered triploid chromosome numbers have been reported, and observations are also consistent with the results found in the genus Medicago of northeastern Turkey by Sandoval et al. [7] and Small et al. [23]. Sandoval et al. [7] reported that the hybridization between different chromosome levels are accomplished only about 1% of the time in generating hybrids, the progeny mainly being tetraploids and rare triploids. Gene flow directly indicates the existence of viable reduced gamete formation among diploid and tetraploid alfalfa. Our results confirm that this is an extensive gene flow among individual plants at the same or different chromosome levels of alfalfa complex in Turkey. Flow cytometry analysis was performed to obtain clearer results of the genome size of samples including Hordeum vulgare “Cervios” as the reference plant. Nuclear DNA content and ploidy level in alfalfa are complex traits, and flow cytometry is being offered as a powerful new tool for assessing those traits in a fast and inexpensive manner [1, 28]. The estimated results verify that the nuclear DNA content of the tested eight varieties is only slightly different from the biggest genome size of 3.92 pg in the varieties Plato obtained in the variety and the smallest nuclear DNA content of 3.71 pg C DNA in the variety Bilensoy82 which results in an average of 3.81 pg C DNA at 2C DNA per nucleus (Table 2and Fig. 2). A similar value was detected among tested varieties; we did not observe the deviations from the expected nuclear DNA content; thereby verifying the tetraploidy of the tested varieties. Nuclear DNA content estimation revealed that alfalfa species have very small genomes and this trait enables the classification of all varieties. However, there was small alteration in the amount of nuclear DNA content in tested varieties that could be related to the growth conditions and geographical region. These results are very similar determination of nuclear DNA content variation among different date palm cultivars (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by flow cytometry. The lower nuclear DNA content were obtained from the Bilensoy82, Erzurum, and Alsancak (3.71 pg, 3.75 pg, 3.79 pg ), whereas the higher nuclear DNA content Plato, Bilensoy, and Iside had a nuclear DNA content of 3.92 pg, 3.87 pg, and 3.85 pg, representing a minimal difference in nuclear DNA content among the tested varieties. The reports are different from those of Şakiroğlu et al. [29] who detected that the 2C DNA genome size of M. sativa subsp. varia ranged from 2.85 pg to 4.9 pg. The large variation value could be a result of different sub-species within one species. In contrast, values of nuclear DNA content were tightly clustered to 3.92 pg to 3.71 pg in our study. Additionally, we obtained three peaks for four (Konya and Muş, Iside, and Plato) due to endoreduplication events (Fig. 2). Many studies show that endoreduplication is linked to the growth and content of nuclear DNA for the increase of crop yield [30,31,32]. The Fabaceae is reported as a family of species such as Medicago, Trifolium, and Lotus experiencing endoreduplication events quite frequently. Endoreduplication can be influenced by a number of factors including family affiliation, organ type, life cycle, and ploidy level. However, the genome size of a species is one of the other factors with minor effects. Endoreduplication may accelerate the size increase of heteromorphic species and compensate for small genomes [33]. The content of nuclear DNA was the highest in Plato (3.92 pg) and had almost similar values with Iside (3.85 pg), Muş (3.81 pg), and Konya (3.80 pg), whereas all other varieties had low nuclear DNA content. Barow et al. [31] revealed that an inverse correlation exists between the endoreduplication and nuclear DNA content and, in most statement, the varieties with a small genome display higher levels of endoreduplication. Our findings partially confirm this phenomenon; Muş variety displayed the highest peak value in endoreduplication followed by Iside, Konya, and Plato. These findings are very similar with one of the first reports on identification and on endoreduplication of lotus species [34]. Brummer et al. reported the chromosome numbers and nuclear DNA contents of 263 alfalfa and 20 Medicago falcata plant species using chromosome counts and flow cytometry. The outcome of the two different methods where ploidy identifications were performed by flow cytometry and traditional chromosome count differed. These results are in agreement with our findings, which demonstrated that flow cytometry is inexpensive and fast on ploidy identification of alfalfa. In fact, the results of this study on chromosome analysis and ploidy level are also in agreement with the study on determination of Latvian alfalfa. In their study, although the performed flow cytometry count displayed non-variability in nuclear contents between plants of the same accessions, the different chromosome count cells as diploid, triploid, and tetraploid were found in the cultivars of Skrīveru and semi wild of Aizkraukles and Dzelmes [27]. Since root cell existence of endoreduplication is well known, therefore, chromosome numbers in roots and leaves could differ [25]. All tested varieties were found to be tetraploid by flow cytometry analysis. Alfalfa is extremely allogamous; thus, it can receive new traits from other species and subspecies. Total protein profile, banding pattern, and cluster research are some of the ways used to evaluate genetic variation in either normal or stress conditions of plants [35]. We suggest that total protein bands be considered to explain the taxonomy specific to the Medicago group and other species. Highly variable banding pattern were observed in these tested samples. As observed through total protein analysis, the amount of protein in the tetraploid plant is correlated to the ploidy level. Moreover, Erzurum and Konya varieties were also almost the same varieties in terms of their protein bands. Interestingly, even Plato was considered as tetraploid with respect to cytological test in which the same varieties exhibited the lowest level of protein. Even though data on the protein profiles of perennial alfalfa is not available, one contrast result found was the total protein profile for 13 samples on liquid media in annual Medicago species of Algerian by Fyad-Lameche et al. [26] because each sample was considered by specific bands. Similar results were obtained using SDS PAGE methods the protein patterns of 47 Centaurea species from Turkey. Their results indicate that the SDS PAGE is a useful selection method for determining intra-species degree within centaurea [36]. In the present study, all of the amplified primers generated bands and distinguished Alfalfa varieties. All transferred markers amplified within M. sativa L. species were polymorphic. Moreover, transferred primers were performed to observe genetic variation within the genus alfalfa. The level of polymorphism was convenient for dendrograms that depicted the genetic similarities of the different alfalfa varieties. The dendrogram demonstrated that alfalfa Muş variety is closely related to Erzurum, but Konya variety is distantly related to Erzurum and Muş varieties (Figs. 3 and 5 and Table 3). Erzurum and Muş varieties were found to be monophyletic species. One variety (Konya) was also found to be monophyletic with Bilensoy82, Muş, and Erzurum varieties were more similar than Konya variety, since these two varieties were collected from regions in Turkey closely located to each other. A distant relationship was observed between varieties of alfalfa collected at different locations as shown in Konya variety (Fig. 5). M. truncatula was found to be polyphyletic from other varieties and did not show any specific correlation with the populations of alfalfa in Turkey, thus verifying the tetraploid nature of the tested varieties, which is also confirmed by flow cytometry peaks (Fig. 3). The observed variations may be expressed by the response of the varieties to the different soil structure, environmental conditions, and gene exchange from other varieties where they were grown. Our results are in line with those of Laamari et al., [37] who verified that the 2C DNA amount of alfalfa Gabsi ranged from 2.87 to 3.12 pg. Therefore, they are suggested for identification of accessions of this genus. Julier et al. [8] displayed similar findings when transferring SSR primers used in M. truncatula to alfalfa. The results of SSR also allowed the establishment of similarity among accessions, reflected by genetic similarity estimation and results of cluster analysis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The first two PC plots clarified 53% of total genetic variance with PC1 = 28% and PC2 = 25%

Conclusions

This report is one of the recent works involving the cytologic traits, molecular characterization, and protein profile of the alfalfa cultivars and ecotypes grown in Turkey. Based on the results, the present work offers rapid and efficient methodology clarifying the genetic variations of alfalfa and revealed sufficient genetic variations among the tested eight cultivars and ecotypes. The cytological and molecular techniques used in this study seem to be beneficial in the genetic studies of alfalfa. This work provides important findings for the classification, conservation, and innovation of alfalfa germplasm resources.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

SSR:

Simple sequence repeat

AFLP:

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

RAPD:

Randomly amplified polymorphism DNA

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

References

  1. Şakiroğlu M, Doyle JJ, Brummer EC (2010) Inferring population structure and genetic diversity of broad range of wild diploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) accessions using SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 121(3):403–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1319-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Putnam DH, Long R, Reed BA, Williams WA (2001) Effect of overseeding forages into alfalfa on alfalfa weevil, forage yield and quality. J Agron Crop Sci 187(2):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00511.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huggins DR, Randall GW, Russelle MP (2001) Subsurface drain losses of water and nitrate following conversion of perennials to row crops. Agron J 93(3):477–486. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.933477x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanjuán J, Ruiz OA (2012) Ecological and agronomic importance of the plant genus Lotus. Its application in grassland sustainability and the amelioration of constrained and contaminated soils. Plant Sci 182:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lesins KA, Lesins I (1979) Genus Medicago (Leguminosae): a taxogenetic study. W Junk Boston 228

  6. Quiros CF, Bauchan GR (1982) The genus Medicago and the origin of the Medicago sativa complex. Origin Evol Medicago 20:93–121

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sandoval MA, Stolpe NB, Zagal EM, Mardones M (2007) The effect of crop-pasture rotations on the C, N and S contents of soil aggregates and structural stability in a volcanic soil of south-Central Chile. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 57:255–262

    Google Scholar 

  8. Julier B, Barre P, Flajoulot S, Santoni S, Cardinet G, Huguet T, Huyghe C (2003) Construction of two genetic linkage maps in cultivated tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa) using microsatellite and AFLP markers. BMC Plant Biol 3(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-3-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noeparvar S, Valızadeh M, Monırıfar H, Haghıgh AR, Darbanı B (2008) Genetic diversity among and within alfalfa populations native to Azerbaijan based on RAPD analysis. J Biol Res 10:159–169

    Google Scholar 

  10. Segovia-Lerma A, Cantrell RG, Conway JM, Ray IM (2003) AFLP-based assessment of genetic diversity among nine alfalfa germplasms using bulk DNA templates. Genome 46(1):51–58. https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quan W, Liu X, Wang H, Chan Z (2016) Physiological and transcriptional responses of contrasting alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties to salt stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 126(1):105–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-0981-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Toth G, Gaspari Z, Jurka J (2000) Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes survey and analysis. Genome Res 10(7):967–981. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.10.7.967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J (2003) Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry Part 51:127–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tucak M, Popovic S, Cupic T, Grljusic S, Bolaric S, Kozumplik V (2008) Genetic diversity of alfalfa (Medicago spp.) estimated by molecular markers and morphological characters. Period Biol 110:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  15. Agayev YM (1998) Advanced squash methods for investigation of plant chromosomes fourth Iranian congress on crop production and breeding science. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bezirganoğlu İ, Hwang SY, Fang TJ, Shaw JF (2013) Transgenic lines of melon (Cucumis melo L. var. makuwa cv. ‘Silver light’) expressing antifungal protein and chitinase genes exhibit enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 112(2)

  17. Erayman M, İlhan E, Güzel Y, Eren AH (2014) Transferability of SSR markers from distantly related legumes to Glycyrrhiza species. Turk J Agric For 38:32–38. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1303-47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227(5259):680–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yeh FC (1999) Microsoft window based freeware for population genetic analysis. Popgene Ver 1.31

  20. Rohlf FJ (1998) Selection of maize genotypes with tolerance to osmotic stress associated with salinity. Agric Sci 2:7

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abbasov M, Brueggeman R, Raupp J, Akparov Z, Aminov N, Bedoshvili D, Gross T, Gross P, Babyeva S, Izzatulayeva V, Mammadova S, Hajiyev E, Rustamov K, Gill B 2018 genetic diversity of Aegilops L. species from Azerbajian and Georgia using SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-018-0725-3

  22. Escaray FJ, Menendez AB, Gárriz A, Pieckenstain FL, Estrella MJ, Castagno LN, Carrasco P, Sanjuán J, Ruiz OA (2012) Ecological and agronomic importance of the plant genus Lotus. Its application in grassland sustainability and the amelioration of constrained and contaminated soils. Plant Sci 182:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Small E, Bauchan GR (2011) Chromosome numbers of the Medicago sativa complex in Turkey. Can J Bot 62(2):749–752

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hadian J, Raeisi S, Azizi A, Pezhmanmehr M, Sarkhosh A (2017) Genetic diversity of natural populations of medicinally valuable plant Satureja khuzistanica Jamzad based on ISSR markers. Braz J Bot 40(3):771–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-017-0374-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brummer C (2004) Applying genomics to alfalfa breeding programs. Crop Sci 44(6):1904–1907. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fyad-Lameche FZ, Iantcheva A, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Brown SC (2016) Chromosome number, genome size, seed storage protein profile and competence for direct somatic embryo formation in Algerian annual Medicago species. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 124(3):531–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0912-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lapina L, Grauda D, Rashal I (2011) Characterızatıon of Latvaın alfalfa Medicago Sativa genetic resources. Acta Biol Univ Daugavpil 11(2):134–140

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ochatt SJ, Patat-Ochatt EM, Djenanne S (2013) Flow cytometric analysis and molecular characterization of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformants of Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 113(2):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0263-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Şakiroglu M, Brummer EC (2011) Clarifying the ploidy of some accessions in the USDA alfalfa germplasm collection. Turk J Bot 35:509–519

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kondorosi E, Roudier F, Gendreau E (2000) Plant cell-size control: growing by ploidy? Curr Opin Plant Biol 3(6):488–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00118-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barow M (2006) Endopolyploidy in seed plants. BioEssays 28(3):271–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kudo H, Cheng KJ, Hanna MR, Howarth RE, Goplen BP, Costerton JW (1985) Ruminal digestion of alfalfa strains selected for slow and fast initial rates of digestion. Can J Anim Sci 65(1):157–161. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas85-016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chod J, Chodová D, Kočova M, Jokeš M (1994) Occurrence of alfalfa mosaic virus on red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and investigation of susceptibility of some cultivars with respect to Hill’s reaction activity and chlorophyll content. Zahradnictví 21:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ducar E, Rewers M, Jedrzejczyk I, Martonfı P, Sliwinska E (2018) Comparison of the genome size, endoreduplication, and ISSR marker polymorphism in eight Lotus (Fabacea) species. Turk J Bot 42:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1703-61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kakaei M, Zebarjadi A, Mostafaie A (2010) Study of protein pattern in Brassica napus genotypes under non-stress and drought stress conditions. Agric Biotechnol 9(2):49–57

    Google Scholar 

  36. Uysal T, Arslan E, Tugay O, Ertuğrul K (2008) Determination of the relationship between some centaurea species based on SDS-PAGE. Turk J Biol 34:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  37. Laamari R, Ochatt S, Ferchichi A (2016) Ploidy level, genome size and genetic variability among a collection of Medicago sativa L. Gabsi as revealed by flow cytometry. J New Sci Agric Biotechnol 33(5):1914–1921

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable for this section.

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BY analyzed and interpreted the data regarding the SSR and total protein analysis. GJ performed the chromosome counting of the plants. IB performed and interpreted the flow cytometry analysis and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Bezirganoglu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yazıcılar, B., Jannati, G. & Bezirganoglu, I. Genetic variations in Turkey cultivar and ecotype Medicago sativa species: cytological, total protein profile, and molecular characterization. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19, 59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00159-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00159-6

Keywords

  • Alfalfa
  • SSR
  • Genetic variations
  • Flow cytometry
  • Chromosome number