Skip to main content

Soluble expression of recombinant active cellulase in E.coli using B.subtilis (natto strain) cellulase gene

Abstract

Background

Cellulases are well known for their various industrial applications. They are naturally produced by different species of bacteria and fungi. Fermentation process of cellulase producers has limitation due to the high substrate cost required for cellulase induction and challenges to maintain the suitable condition for the respective cellulase production. Recombinant cellulase production could be the potential solution to these problems. In the current study, we investigated recombinant cellulase expression in Escherichia coli using cellulase gene from Bacillus subtilis.

Results

Extracellular cellulase production from B. subtilis strain was first confirmed on CMC agar and then the cellulase gene (1500 bp) was amplified from this strain and was further cloned in pET21a expression vector. In initial experimental studies, recombinant cellulase expression was achieved in inclusion bodies through shake flask level fermentation of transformed E. coli expression host BL21DE3. Attempts were made to express this 55 KDa His tagged recombinant cellulase into soluble form by modifications in fermentation conditions. Partially purified recombinant cellulase was obtained using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. The activity of the purified enzyme was confirmed by 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) qualitative assay.

Conclusion

Soluble expression of active recombinant cellulase can be achieved by subtle alteration in the upstream process.

Background

Cellulases have a wide range of industrial applications in textile, pulp and paper, brewery and wine extraction, animal feed industries, along with agriculture [1]. The major industrial application of cellulases is in the textile industry to produce the stone-washed look of denims and for the household laundry detergents for refining fabric softness and brightness [2].

Cellulases are produced in large scale using fungi, bacteria or actinomycetes. The high cost of cellulases is mainly due to the substrates used in the production, and slow growth rate of fungi [1]. There are several reports on production of cellulases from bacteria such as Bacillus [3], Clostridium and Ruminococcus [4] and Streptomyces spp., [5]. Microbial cellulases consist of three types of enzymatic activities such as (1) Endo-(1,4)-β-D-glucanase, (2) Exo-(1,4)-β-D-glucanase and (3) β-glucosidase [6]. These enzymes can either be in single subunit form, particularly in aerobic microorganisms, or grouped in a multicomponent enzyme complex called ‘cellulosomes’ in anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria [7].

Bacillus spp. is highly studied for its diverse range of cellulases that are stable under extreme conditions [8, 9]. Amongst all Bacillus spp., Bacillus subtilis continues to be a dominant workhorse due to its capacity to secrete large quantities of extracellular cellulolytic enzymes [3, 10,11,12]. Many B. subtilis strains showing cellulase activity have been isolated from various sources like soil irrigated with paper and pulp mill effluent [13], gut of termites [14], alkaline soil sample [15] and even from unexplored niches. It is been reported that B. subtilis (natto strain) which is used to prepare fermented soybean product called natto for several years produces multiple enzymes and one of them is cellulase [16]. There are not many reports about the cellulase gene from this strain which is mainly used as probiotic.

Cellulase production is possible in two ways, one from naturally producing microorganism and second with recombinant expression in prokaryotic or eukaryotic expression system. The naturally produced cellulases are functionally active but get produced in low concentrations, the reason being the conditions for enzyme production are probably not always favourable. Also, these cellulases require specific type of substrates, for which availability and cost both are important criteria. Hence, researchers have focused on developing recombinant cellulase using Escherichia coli expression system. Escherichia coli, as a host, does not require specific media and grows robustly. The major advantage of recombinant cellulase is the scaleup at the production level without the use of expensive substrate [5, 8, 10, 12,13,14, 17, 18].

Here, we report on the cloning of the cellulase gene from Bacillus subtilis (natto strain) which was isolated from the Japanese food, natto, in T7 promoter-based vector (pET21a). We have optimised fermentation conditions for soluble expression of recombinant cellulase (Endo-(1,4)-β-D-glucanase) in E.coli expression host and the enzyme was further purified by metal affinity chromatography. The activity of recombinant cellulase was evaluated by 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay [19].

Methods

Bacterial culture and chemicals

Bacillus subtilis (natto CGMCC2108 strain), gifted by one of the collaborators during research work. pET21a vector, E. coli strains BL21 (DE3) and DH5α were purchased from Novagen (USA). Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) matrix for affinity chromatography was procured from Qiagen (Germany).

Primer designing

Oligonucleotides were designed with suitable restriction enzyme sites and 6X Histidine (His) tag. Forward primer is with a BamHI site and His tag 5′ CCG GGA TCC CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT ATG AAA CGG TCA ATC 3′ and the reverse primer is with EcoRI and HindIII site 5′ CCG GAA TTC AAG CTT CTA ATT TGG TTC TGT TCC TCA 3′. Primers were synthesised by Sigma (USA).

Gene amplification and cloning

Available strain of B. subtilis was tested for cellulase activity on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) agar and then cellulase gene was amplified from its genomic DNA using forward and reverse primers mentioned earlier in a 25-μL reaction volume. Two-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) programme was set up for amplification with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 7 min followed by 5 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 47 °C for 45 s, elongation at 72 °C for 90 s. Later, 30 cycles were denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 61 °C for 45 s and elongation at 72 °C for 90 s. The resultant amplicon of 1500 bp was checked on 1% agarose gel. It was then purified using PCR purification kit and digested with ‘BamHI’ and ‘HindIII’. After purification of the digested amplicon, it was ligated into the pET21a vector double digested with the same enzymes. This ligation mix was transformed into E. coli (DH5α) competent cells and recombinant clone was confirmed by colony PCR using gene-specific primers.

Shake flask level fermentation and optimisation of fermentation conditions

pET21a-cellulase recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells. For expression, the culture was grown in LB broth with 100 μg/ml final concentration of ampicillin till it reaches 0.8-1 OD. Further, the culture was induced with isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) 1 mM final concentration and incubated at 37 °C and 180 rpm in a shaker incubator for 4 h. At the end of the induction period, the cells were harvested and lysed by mechanical lysis (glass beads) method for protein extraction. Expression of protein was confirmed on 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

For optimisation of soluble protein expression, the induction concentration of IPTG was reduced (0.5 mM final concentration) and the induction time was increased to 12 to 16 h at 28 °C. Protein profile was checked on 10% SDS-PAGE.

Protein purification by metal affinity chromatography

Supernatant of the cell lysate was passed through Ni-NTA matrix to purify His tagged cellulase by metal affinity chromatography. Matrix was saturated with binding buffer/wash buffer (300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris Cl pH 8). After saturation, the supernatant of cell lysate was loaded. Loosely bound contaminant proteins were washed with wash buffer containing 20 mM imidazole. After matrix washing, elution was carried out using an imidazole gradient (250 mM and 500 mM). The protein purity of the eluted fraction was checked on 10% SDS-PAGE.

Cellulase enzyme activity

Qualitative analysis of recombinant cellulase was performed by DNS assay. Reaction was set up as 0.45 ml 1% CMC in 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 5) mixed with 0.05 ml enzyme source (crude lysate as well as purified elution fraction in separate tubes). Blank reaction was set up replacing enzyme source with distilled water. Sample and blank tubes were incubated at 55 °C for 30 min. Post incubation, 0.5 ml of DNS reagent was added to all the tubes and kept on a boiling water bath for 5 min. Development of orange colour indicated the generation of free glucose residues post digestion of substrate with cellulase.

Results

Inherent cellulase activity of Bacillus subtilis (natto CGMCC2108 strain)

Cellulase activity was ensured before cloning and recombinant expression in the bacterial system. As is evident in Fig. 1, the zone of clearance surrounding the bacterial growth confirms the production of cellulase enzyme by the strain.

Fig. 1
figure1

Cellulase activity by B. subtilis: B. subtilis culture when grown on CMC agar gives zone of clearance due to cellulase production

Cloning of cellulase gene in pET21a vector

The cellulase gene was PCR amplified from Bacillus subtilis genomic DNA template to PCR product of 1500 bp was confirmed by loading on 1% agarose gel (Fig. 2) along with standard DNA marker (EcoRI and HindIII digested λ DNA). Amplified gene was digested with ‘BamHI’ and ‘HindIII’ and ligated into the pET21a vector digested with ‘BamHI’ and ‘HindIII’ to obtain the recombinant.

Fig. 2
figure2

PCR amplification of cellulase gene from B. subtilis genome on 1% agarose gel. Lane 1, λDNA EcoRI/HindIII marker (Thermo Scientific); lane 2, cellulase amplicon; lane 3, non-template control

Confirmation of clone by colony PCR

The recombinant clone of pET21a cellulase was confirmed by colony PCR using gene-specific primers. Amplicon size was compared with the positive control (amplicon where Bacillus subtilis genomic DNA was used as a template) on 1% agarose gel. As is evident in Fig. 3, out of 9 colonies screened, colony 6 showed an expected size of amplicon.

Fig. 3
figure3

Screening of recombinants by colony PCR on 1% agarose gel. Lane 1, positive control (amplicon from genomic DNA); lane 2-6, colony PCR products; lane 6, size of amplicon matching positive control (pET21a-cellulase recombinant); lane 7, colony carrying pET vector without gene (negative control)

Recombinant cellulase expression

pET21a-cellulase clone was transformed into E. coli expression host BL21 (DE3). Culture induced with IPTG was analysed on 10% SDS-PAGE for overexpression of recombinant cellulase (Fig. 4) with reference to the protein marker (medium range).

Fig. 4
figure4

Analysis of expressed recombinant cellulase on 10% SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, protein marker (GeNei); lane 2, supernatant of cell lysate; lane 3, pellet of cell lysate (20 μl); lane 4, pellet of cell lysate (40 μl) with arrow showing expressed cellulase protein; lane 5, BL21 cells carrying pET21a plasmid without gene

Optimisation of fermentation conditions

The slow induction of recombinant cellulase was attempted to achieve soluble expression by inducing the cells with 0.5 mM IPTG for the period of 16 h at 28 °C with shaking at 120 rpm. Cell lysate was prepared by mechanical bead lysis method and compared with previous insoluble protein pellet on 10% SDS-PAGE. As is evident in Fig. 5 (lane 4), most of the protein expression was visible in the soluble fraction of the cell lysate rather than inclusion bodies.

Fig. 5
figure5

Cellulase expression with increased solubility. Lane 1, protein marker; lane 2, pellet of cell lysate; lane 3, pellet (inclusion body) of slow induction; lane 4, supernatant (soluble fraction) of slow induction with arrow showing hyper expressed cellulase protein

Metal affinity purification of recombinant cellulase

The supernatant of cell lysate carrying recombinant cellulase with 6X His tag was loaded onto Ni-NTA affinity chromatography column. Purified elution fraction was loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE along with standard protein marker (medium range) to evaluate the purity of the protein. The gel was stained by silver stain. As is evident from Fig. 6, partial purification of recombinant cellulase, has been successfully achieved.

Fig. 6
figure6

Protein profile of partially purified (metal affinity purification) recombinant cellulase on SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, protein marker; lane 2, supernatant of cell lysate; lane 3, flow through of supernatant; lane 4, wash fraction; lane 5, elution fraction (250 mM imidazole) with arrow showing cellulase band

DNS qualitative assay

It is a colour-based assay for the detection of reducing sugar. As seen in Fig. 7, eluted fractions containing partially purified recombinant cellulase could digest the CMC substrate and release glucose molecules imparting orange colour post addition of DNS. This confirms that the soluble recombinant cellulase expressed in E.coli was active.

Fig. 7
figure7

Qualitative analysis of reducing sugar by DNS assay. Tube 1, blank; tube 2, 1st elution fraction (250 mM imidazole); tube 3, crude supernatant of cell lysate

Discussion

With the increasing importance of the industrial application of cellulase in a wide range of fields, researchers have been working for its large-scale production [1, 2, 13, 20, 21]. Bacterial and fungal sources are the potential options to produce an active enzyme. However, cellulases produced naturally by bacterial and fungal strains showed some limitations in terms of inoculum growth conditions, time and productivity of the fermentation process. Hence, recombinant cellulase has been explored as an alternative to overcome limitations of the naturally produced cellulases.

Source for the gene of interest and host for the protein production are the two fundamental criteria in recombinant protein/enzyme expression. Cellulases are composed of endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase and β-glucosidase. Several reports are available for recombinant expression studies of these enzymes. In our work, BL21 (DE3) and pET21a (host—vector) combination was used for recombinant cellulase (endo-(1,4)-β-D-glucanase) production. Barros et al. [22] reported cloning and expression of cellulase gene from R. flavefaciens in HB101 strain of E. coli, cellulase gene was inserted within EcoRI site of pEcoR251 vector and expressed under λ promoter. In another study, randomly digested fragments of C. firmi genomic DNA was cloned in pBR322 and expressed in CSR603 strain of E. coli [23]. Cellulase gene from fungal source was studied by means of cDNA cloning and expression in λZAPII system by Gang-Ping Xue et al. [24]. Considering the upgradation in heterologous protein expression, researchers have changed the experimental strategies in later reports. Protease deficient bacterial and yeast cell lines and expression vectors with strong promoters were the most favoured combination in various studies [25].

Amongst fungal sources of cellulase gene, different strains of Trichoderma were widely studied. Zeng et al. [26] reported cloning and expression of endo-(1,4)-β-D-glucanase gene from T. virens and disulphide bond formation was achieved by using pET32a vector. In another study, Okada et al. [27], experimentally analysed the structural properties of recombinant EGIII protein (variant of endo-(1,4)-β-D-glucanase) using QM9414 strain of T. reesei as a source of cellulase gene. They have also mentioned comparative heterologous expression in bacterial and yeast systems with solubility as well as activity studies.

In the current study, Bacillus subtilis natto strain was selected as a source of cellulase (endo-(1,4)-β-D-glucanase) gene which was tested for cellulolytic activity by Congo red staining assay on CMC containing media. Bacillus is reported as the preferred genus for bacterial source of cellulase gene in most of the studies, although there are also reports for actinomycetes and other genera [17, 28]. Although it is known that B. subtilis (natto strain) produces multiple enzymes like amylase, cellulase and proteases, the cellulase enzyme from this strain is not much explored. Since this strain is mainly used for the fermentation of soybean products, its proteases are well characterised [16]. The cellulase gene from this strain was amplified to achieve the amplicon of 1500 bp, and it was further cloned in pET21a vector. Selected recombinant was transformed into BL21DE3 expression host and induced with 1 mM IPTG; the recombinant cellulase was observed in inclusion bodies. Expression of recombinant protein in inclusion bodies always poses a challenge during the purification step. It is hence always preferred to achieve the soluble expression of the recombinant protein which ensures less hassles during purification and also, it is likely to give active protein molecule..

Soluble expression of recombinant protein has the biggest advantage during the fermentation process as very few inherent bacterial proteins are expressed in soluble form. Additionally, soluble protein expression reduces downstream processing cost which has a direct impact on total production cost. There are several methods to convert proteins expressed in inclusion bodies into a soluble form, but it can be time consuming and expensive. Fusion of solubility tags to desired protein, selection of different vector-host combinations, and optimisation in expression conditions are the potential modification scientists attempt to achieve soluble protein expression. One such cost-effective approach reported by Munjal et al. [20], as recombinant extracellular cellulase expression in ethanologenic strain of E. coli by replacement of inducible promoter with native constitutive promoter (gapA). Variations in the usage of solubility tags/signal peptide are also reported by some researchers. Amore et al. [17] and Liu et al. [29] used signal peptide of source organism whereas Kim et al. [30] expressed cellulase on the outer membrane of E. coli in fusion with ice nucleation protein (membrane protein of P. syringae).

In the current work, we used the slow protein induction strategy with 0.5 mM IPTG induction for 16 h at 28 °C. This helped in achieving the cellulase expression in soluble fraction rather than inclusion bodies. This strategy was definitely advantageous as it helped in lesser downstream steps because no solubility tag was used. Solubility tag poses problems due to the requirement of its removal to obtain authentic protein. Slow induction process with a lesser concentration of inducer can reduce upstream process cost in large-scale production.

Increased solubility of cellulase protein and N terminal 6X His tag allowed simple two-step metal affinity purification of the protein [31]. Purity of the eluted fraction was evaluated in comparison with the crude cell lysate on SDS-PAGE. Partial purification of recombinant cellulase (55 KDa) was achieved. The recombinant enzyme was also found to be active by qualitative DNS assay. Standardisation for scaleup of fermentation process to achieve hyperexpression of soluble enzyme as well as the study of kinetic parameters of this soluble recombinant enzyme would be a prime objective of the further work.

Conclusion

In the current work, recombinant cellulase enzyme was produced using cellulase gene of B. subtilis (natto strain) which is not much explored for its cellulase activity using standard shake flask fermentation protocol. Majority of the enzyme expression was seen in the inclusion bodies but when the fermentation parameters were changed for slow induction of protein, the cellulase expression was achieved in soluble fraction. Hence, optimisation of fermentation conditions attempted in this research work to achieve soluble expression of cellulase is the promising alternative. Future work would be required to evaluate if this strategy can be scalable as well as if it would be cost effective for large scale production.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated and/or analysed during this study is included in this published article.

Abbreviations

DNS:

3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid

Ni-NTA:

Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

LB:

Luria Bertani

IPTG:

Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside

rpm:

Revolutions per minute

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

CMC:

Carboxymethyl cellulose

His:

Histidine

bp:

Base pairs

KDa:

Kilodalton

References

  1. 1.

    Bhat MK (2000) Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotech Adv 18:355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cavaco-Paulo A (1998) Mechanism of cellulase action in textile processes. Carbohydrate Polym 37:273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rawat R, Tewari L (2012) Purification and characterization of an acidothermophilic cellulase enzyme produced by Bacillus subtilis strain LFS3. Extremophiles 16(4):637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bayer EA, Shoham Y, Lamed R (2006) Cellulose decomposing bacteria and their enzyme systems. Prokaryotes 2:578–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nascimento RP, Junior NA, Pereira N Jr, Bon EP, Coelho RR (2009) Brewer’s spent grain and corn steep liquor as substrates for cellulolytic enzymes production by Streptomyces malaysiensis. Lett Appl. Microbiol 48:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Pandey A (2005) Microbial cellulases production, applications and challenges. J Sci Ind Res 64:832–844

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol Biol Rev 66:50–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Annamalai N, Thavasi R, Vijayalakshmi S, Balasubramanian T (2011) A novel thermostable and halostable carboxymethylcellulase from marine bacterium Bacillus licheniformis AU01. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:2111–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Singh J, Batra N, Sobti RC (2004) Purification and characterization of alkaline cellulase produced by a novel isolate Bacillus sphaericus JSI. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Deka D, Bhargavi P, Sharma A, Goyal D, Jawed M, Goyal A (2011) Enhancement of cellulase activity from a new strain of Bacillus subtilis by medium optimization and analysis with various cellulosic substrates. Dig Enzyme Research. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/151656

  11. 11.

    Yin LJ, Lin HH, Xiao ZR (2010) Purification and characterization of a cellulase from Bacillus subtilis YJ1. J Marine Sci. Technol 18:466–471

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim YK, Lee SC, Cho YY, Oh HJ, Ko YH (2012) Isolation of cellulolytic Bacillus subtilis strains from agricultural environments. Dig ISRN Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/650563

  13. 13.

    Pandey S, Kushwah J, Tiwari R, Kumar R, Somwanshi V, Nain L, Saxena A (2014) Cloning and expression of B-1-4 endogluconase gene from Bacillus subtilis isolated from soil long term irrigated with effluents of paper and pulp mill. Microbiological Research 169:693–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2014.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wei K, Teoh T, Koshy P, Salmah I, Zainudin A (2015) Cloning, expression and characterization of the endoglucanase gene from Bacillus subtilis UMC7 isolated from the gut of indigenous termites Macrotermes malaccensis in Escherichia coli. Electronic J Biotechnol 18:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zafar M, Ahmed S, Khan M, Jamil A (2014) Recombinant expression and characterization of novel endoglucanase from Bacillus subtilis in Escherichia coli. Mol. Biol. Rep. 41:3295–3302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3192-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wu F, Chang C, Shih I (2013) Optimization of the production and characterization of milk clotting enzymes by Bacillus subtilis natt. SpringerPlus 2:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Amore A, Pepe O, Ventorino V, Birolo L, Giangrande C, Faraco V (2012) Cloning and recombinant expression of cellulase from the cellulolytic strain Streptomyces sp. G12 isolated from compost. Microbial Cell Factories 11:164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Daehwan K, Ku S (2018) Bacillus cellulase molecular cloning, expression, and surface display on the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Molecules 23:503. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sadasivam S, Manickam A (2008) Biochemical methods. New age international publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Munjal N, Jawed K, Wajid S, Yazdani SS (2015) A constitutive expression system for cellulase secretion in Escherichia coli and its use in bioethanol production. PLOS one 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119917

  21. 21.

    Zhang XZ, Zhang YP (2013) Cellulases: characteristics, sources, production, and applications. In: Yang ST, HA EL-E, Thongchul N (eds) Bioprocessing Technologies in Biorefinery for Sustainable Production of Fuels, Chemicals, and Polymers, 1st edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Barros MEC, Thompson JA (1987) Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of cellulase gene from Ruminococcus flavefaciens. J Bacteriol 169(4):1760–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gilkes N, Kilburn DG, Langsford ML, MillerJR RC, Wakarchuk WW, Warren RAJ, Whittle DJ, Wong WKR (1984) Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli clones expressing cellulase genes from Cellulomonas fimi. J Gen Microbiol 130:1377–1384

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gang-PingXue OCG, Gobius KS, Aylward JH, Simpso GD (1992) Cloning and expression of multiple cellulase cDNAs from the anaerobic rumen fungus Neocallimastix patriciarum in Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 138:1413–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schallmey M, Singh A, Ward OP (2004) Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production. Canadian J Microbiol 50(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zeng R, Hu Q, Yin X, Huang H, Yan J, Gong Z, Yang Z (2016) Cloning a novel endo-1, 4-β-D-glucanase gene from Trichoderma virens and heterologous expression in E. Coli. AMB Express 6:108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0282-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Okada H, Tada K, Sekiya T, Yokoyama K, Takahashi A, Tohda H, Kumagai H, Morikawa Y (1998) Molecular characterization and heterologous expression of the gene encoding a low-molecular-mass endoglucanase from Trichoderma reesei QM9414. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64(2):555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Linger JG, Adney WS, Darzins A (2010) Heterologous expression and extracellular secretion of cellulolytic enzymes by Zymomonas mobilis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76(19):6360–6369. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00230-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Liu Y, Guo H, Wu Y, Qin W (2018) Purification and characterizations of a novel recombinant Bacillus velezensis endoglucanase by aqueous two-phase system. Bioresources Bioprocessing 5:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-018-0204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kim BK, Lee BH, Lee YJ, Jin IH, Chung CH, Lee JW (2009) Purification and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulase isolated from a marine bacterium, Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis A-53. Enzym. Microb Technol 44:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning – a laboratory manual. Cold spring harbour press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BV performed all the experiments and compiled the data; SD supervised entire experimental work, analysed the data and helped in drafting the manuscript. Both BV and SD have contributed equally to the manuscript. AD conceived and planned the study and reviewed the final manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali Apte-Deshpande.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vadala, B.S., Deshpande, S. & Apte-Deshpande, A. Soluble expression of recombinant active cellulase in E.coli using B.subtilis (natto strain) cellulase gene. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19, 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00103-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cellulase
  • Recombinant expression
  • B. subtilis
  • pET21a
\