Skip to main content

Table 4 Genetic variation indices and polymorphic features of Phoenix dactylifera L. populations revealed by SSR (a) and DAMD (b) markers and combined data of the both markers (c)

From: Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of Moroccan date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using SSR and DAMD molecular markers

a

 

SSR

       
 

Populations

N

Na(± SE)

Ne(± SE)

I(± SE)

He(± SE)

uHe(± SE)

%P

Np

 

Tinghir

26,000

1,888(0,028)

1,356(0,020)

0,360(0,014)

0,225(0,010)

0,230(0,010)

93,57%

0

 

Errachidia

36,000

1,892(0,028)

1,405(0,021)

0,391-(0,014)

0,250(0,011)

0,254(0,011)

94,38%

0

 

Tata

52,000

1,984(0,011)

1,408(0,020)

0,402(0,013)

0,255(0,010)

0,258(0,010)

99,20%

0

 

Goulmima

55,000

1,952(0,019)

1,369(0,019)

0,381(0,012)

0,238(0,009)

0,240(0,010)

97,59%

0

 

Zagora

96,000

1,980(0,011)

1,386(0,019)

0,395(0,012)

0,248(0,009)

0,249(0,009)

98,39%

0

 

Moroccan

11,000

1,394(0,058)

1,285(0,020)

0,288(0,015)

0,181(0,011)

0,190(0,011)

68,67%

0

 

Iraqi cultivars

7,000

1,414(0,058)

1,364(0,022)

0,338(0,016)

0,220(0,012)

0,237(0,013)

70,28%

1

 

Mean

 

1,786(0,015)

1,368(0,008)

0,365(0,005)

0,231(0,004)

0,237(0,004)

88,87%

 

b

 

DAMD

       
 

Populations

N

Na(± SE)

Ne(± SE)

I(± SE)

He(± SE)

uHe(± SE)

%P

Np

 

Tinghir

26,000

0,934(0,044)

1,243(0,016)

0,216(0,012)

0,143(0,009)

0,146(0,009)

44,56%

16

 

Errachidia

36,000

1,037(0,045)

1,243(0,015)

0,229(0,012)

0,149(0,008)

0,151(0,008)

50,31%

18

 

Tata

52,000

1,152(0,045)

1,247(0,015)

0,236(0,012)

0,151(0,008)

0,153(0,008)

57,29%

8

 

Goulmima

55,000

1,211(0,044)

1,246(0,015)

0,235(0,012)

0,150(0,008)

0,152(0,008)

59,75%

29

 

Zagora

96,000

1,349(0,042)

1,254(0,014)

0,252(0,011)

0,160(0,008)

0,160(0,008)

67,15%

39

 

Moroccan varieties

11,000

0,690(0,041)

1,148(0,013)

0,139(0,011)

0,090(0,007)

0,094(0,008)

30,39%

0

 

Iraqi cultivars

7,000

0,739(0,044)

1,235(0,016)

0,199(0,013)

0,134(0,009)

0,145(0,009)

36,96%

0

 

Mean

 

1,016(0,017)

1,231(0,006)

0,215(0,004)

0,140(0,003)

0,143(0,003)

49,49%

 

c

Populations

N

Na(± SE)

Ne(± SE)

I(± SE)

He(± SE)

uHe(± SE)

%P

 
 

Tinghir

26,000

1,257(0,035)

1,281(0,013)

0,265(0,010)

0,171(0,007)

0,175(0,007)

61,14%

 
 

Errachidia

36,000

1,326(0,034)

1,298(0,012)

0,284(0,010)

0,183(0,007)

0,186(0,007)

65,22%

 
 

Tata

52,000

1,433(0,033)

1,302(0,012)

0,292(0,009)

0,187(0,007)

0,188(0,007)

71,47%

 
 

Goulmima

55,000

1,462(0,032)

1,287(0,012)

0,284(0,009)

0,180(0,006)

0,182(0,007)

72,55%

 
 

Zagora

96,000

1,563(0,030)

1,299(0,012)

0,301(0,009)

0,189(0,006)

0,190(0,006)

77,72%

 
 

Moroccan varieties

11,000

0,928(0,036)

1,194(0,011)

0,189(0,009)

0,121(0,006)

0,127(0,007)

43,34%

 
 

Iraqi cultivars

7,000

0,967(0,037)

1,279(0,013)

0,246(0,010)

0,163(0,007)

0,176(0,008)

48,23%

 
 

Mean

 

1,277(0,013)

1,277(0,005)

0,266(0,004)

0,171(0,003)

0,175(0,003)

62,81%

 
  1. N Number of individuals, Na Number of different alleles, Ne Number of effective alleles, I Shannon’s information index, He Expected heterozygosity, uHe Unbiased expected heterozygosity, Np Number of private bands, %P Percentage of polymorphic loci, (a) SSR result, (b) DAMD result, (c) combined result