Skip to main content

Table 4 Association of HIF-1α and VEGF variants with diabetic retinopathy risk according to genetic association models using binary logistic regression

From: Association study of HIF-1α rs11549465 and VEGF rs3025039 genetic variants with diabetic retinopathy in Egyptian patients: crosslinks with angiogenic, inflammatory, and anti-inflammatory markers

 

NPDR vs. DWR

PDR vs. DWR

#Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P value

#Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P value

HIF-1α rs11549465 C>T

 Homozygous model (TT versus CC)

0.00 (0.00–0.00)

0.968

0.00 (0.00–0.00)

0.999

 Heterozygous model (CT versus CC)

0.23 (0.01–4.10)

0.314

14.42 (0.06–3689)

0.346

 Dominant model (CC/CT versus CC)

2.15 (0.37–12.49)

0.396

7.87 (0.03–1973)

0.464

 Recessive model (TT versus CT/CC)

42.82 (1.72–1007)

0.022

0.51 (0.01–43.92)

0.764

VEGF rs3025039 C>T

 Homozygous model (TT versus CC)

0.00 (0.00–0.00)

0.972

0.00 (0.00–0.00)

0.978

 Heterozygous model (CT versus CC)

10.88 (0.74–159.86)

0.082

0.01 (65.73)

0.813

 Dominant model (CC/CT versus CC)

18.72 (1.42–246.14)

0.026

0.45 (0.003–61.72

0.749

 Recessive model (TT versus CT/CC)

7.77 (0.65–93.22)

0.106

3.02 (0.001–6181)

0.776

  1. DWR diabetic without retinopathy, NPDR non-proliferative retinopathy, PDR proliferative retinopathy, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
  2. #Adjusted for age, BMI, FBG, HbA1c, TG, TC, LDL, HDL, and VLDL
  3. P < 0.025 was considered significant after the Bonferroni correction