Skip to main content

Table 2 A comparative study of the performance of MFC between using different nickel-based electrocatalyst

From: The enhancement of microbial fuel cell performance by anodic bacterial community adaptation and cathodic mixed nickel–copper oxides on a graphene electrocatalyst

Cathode catalyst

Anode material

Cathode material

Substrate

MFC configuration

Microorganism

Open circuit potential

(mV)

closed circuit voltage (mV)

PDmax

(mW.m−2)

Percentage to Pt cathode

(%)

Ref.

NiO–CuO/G

Carbon felt

Carbon cloth

Sodium acetate

Air cathode

Activated sludge

654

541

21.25

42.16

This study

Nickel nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide

Graphite

brush

Carbon cloth

Sodium acetate

Air cathode

Anaerobic digester sludge

602

136.8

581

26.4

(Valipour et al. 2016) [5]

Naphthalocyanine on carbon black (NPc/C)

Carbon paper

Carbon paper

Wastewater

Double chamber

Anaerobic digester sludge

602

168

29.7

36.53

(Rae et al. 2011) [58]

Nickel oxide and carbon nanotube composite (NiO/CNT)

Carbon felts

Carbon cloth

Glucose

Air cathode

Acclimated sludge from methane-generating pond

772

380

670

N/Aa

(Huang et al. 2015) [29]

Pt-Ni alloy

Nano particles on Carboxyl multi-wall carbon nanotubes (Pt-Ni/MWNT)

Carbon cloth

Carbon cloth

Glucose

Air cathode

Pre-domesticated bacteria from another double chamber MFC

740

570

1.22

86.8

(Yan et al. 2012) [16]

Ni-tetra sulfonated phthalocyanine

Stainless steel foam was modified with rGO

Carbon felt

Sodium acetate

Double chamber

A mixture of compost garden’s leachate

  

24.8

N/Aa

(Champavert et al. 2015) [32]

Graphene/nickel hybrids

Graphite plate

Graphite plate

Waste water

Dual chamber

Wastewater

  

34

N/Aa

(Kartick et al. 2016) [31]

Nickel nanoparticles

Carbon paper

Carbon paper

Glucose

Dual chamber

Palm oil mill effluent anaerobic

sludge

751.8

 

94.4

78.15

(Ghasemi et al. 2013) [28]

  1. CNT carbon nanotube, MWNT multi-wall carbon nanotubes
  2. a N/A not available